


Verizon and Google Seek to Pause Copyright Infringement Litigation
The companies want the Cox Communications case to reach its conclusion
Verizon and Google have made separate applications to have their respective copyright infringement cases put on hold, arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Cox Communications litigation could have ramifications for their cases.
Some context:
In 2019 Warner Music Group, Universal Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment sued Cox Communications over its subscribers’ alleged repeat copyright infringements.
Though the labels were initially victorious, last month the Supreme Court agreed to review the case.
The result could have major ramifications for similar lawsuits.
Verizon’s argument:
The major labels sued Verizon in July 2024 over its subscribers’ alleged copyright infringements.
As per Digital Music News (DMN), in their recently submitted letter to the court Verizon argue, “The Cox petition presents the same issue as Verizon’s pending motion to dismiss: whether an internet service provider (ISP) can be contributorily liable when others allegedly use its internet service to commit copyright infringement.”
Arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Cox case “will control this Court’s decision,” Verizon has requested a stay in proceedings.
The labels oppose the motion.
A ruling in the Cox case isn’t expected until midway through 2026.
Google’s argument:
Google is being sued by text publishers such as Cengage and Macmillan, which allege it didn’t do enough to prevent piracy, and even profited from it.
Though the publishers’ vicarious liability claim was dismissed, the claim for contributory infringement is ongoing.
Google is requesting a stay in that litigation until the Supreme Court’s Cox ruling, arguing it could have an impact on its lawsuit, and potentially determine the outcome.
Verizon and Google have made separate applications to have their respective copyright infringement cases put on hold, arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Cox Communications litigation could have ramifications for their cases.
Some context:
In 2019 Warner Music Group, Universal Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment sued Cox Communications over its subscribers’ alleged repeat copyright infringements.
Though the labels were initially victorious, last month the Supreme Court agreed to review the case.
The result could have major ramifications for similar lawsuits.
Verizon’s argument:
The major labels sued Verizon in July 2024 over its subscribers’ alleged copyright infringements.
As per Digital Music News (DMN), in their recently submitted letter to the court Verizon argue, “The Cox petition presents the same issue as Verizon’s pending motion to dismiss: whether an internet service provider (ISP) can be contributorily liable when others allegedly use its internet service to commit copyright infringement.”
Arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Cox case “will control this Court’s decision,” Verizon has requested a stay in proceedings.
The labels oppose the motion.
A ruling in the Cox case isn’t expected until midway through 2026.
Google’s argument:
Google is being sued by text publishers such as Cengage and Macmillan, which allege it didn’t do enough to prevent piracy, and even profited from it.
Though the publishers’ vicarious liability claim was dismissed, the claim for contributory infringement is ongoing.
Google is requesting a stay in that litigation until the Supreme Court’s Cox ruling, arguing it could have an impact on its lawsuit, and potentially determine the outcome.
Verizon and Google have made separate applications to have their respective copyright infringement cases put on hold, arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Cox Communications litigation could have ramifications for their cases.
Some context:
In 2019 Warner Music Group, Universal Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment sued Cox Communications over its subscribers’ alleged repeat copyright infringements.
Though the labels were initially victorious, last month the Supreme Court agreed to review the case.
The result could have major ramifications for similar lawsuits.
Verizon’s argument:
The major labels sued Verizon in July 2024 over its subscribers’ alleged copyright infringements.
As per Digital Music News (DMN), in their recently submitted letter to the court Verizon argue, “The Cox petition presents the same issue as Verizon’s pending motion to dismiss: whether an internet service provider (ISP) can be contributorily liable when others allegedly use its internet service to commit copyright infringement.”
Arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Cox case “will control this Court’s decision,” Verizon has requested a stay in proceedings.
The labels oppose the motion.
A ruling in the Cox case isn’t expected until midway through 2026.
Google’s argument:
Google is being sued by text publishers such as Cengage and Macmillan, which allege it didn’t do enough to prevent piracy, and even profited from it.
Though the publishers’ vicarious liability claim was dismissed, the claim for contributory infringement is ongoing.
Google is requesting a stay in that litigation until the Supreme Court’s Cox ruling, arguing it could have an impact on its lawsuit, and potentially determine the outcome.
Verizon
Cox Communications
Warner Music Group
Sony Music Entertainment
Cengage
Macmillan
Digital Music News
Universal Music Group (UMG)
WMG
ISP Copyright Liability
Music Copyright Litigation
Industry Litigation
Major Labels Vs Content Platforms
Legal Challenges For Social Media Platforms
Supreme Court Precedent Impact
Copyright Infringement
ISP Liability
Litigation
Major Labels
Vicarious Liability
Contributory Infringement
Litigation Stay
United States
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This story was written with information sourced from Digital Music News.
- We covered it because of the industry interest in the Cox Communications case and its potential impact on other copyright litigation.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Dec 3, 2025
1 min read
Gene Simmons to Testify Before Senate to Support Artist Radio Play Compensation
Dissimilar to streaming, AM and FM radio do not currently require royalty payouts for every play

Policy & Legal
Dec 3, 2025
1 min read
WMG Sues US Fashion Retailer PacSun
The label alleges unauthorized use of 290+ works on TikTok, Instagram

Policy & Legal
Dec 3, 2025
1 min read
Jorja Smith’s Label Hits Back at ‘I Run,’ Demands Cut of the Track
FAMM claims the song infringes Smith’s rights

Gene Simmons to Testify Before Senate to Support Artist Radio Play Compensation
Dissimilar to streaming, AM and FM radio do not currently require royalty payouts for every play

Harry Levin
Policy
Dec 3, 2025

WMG Sues US Fashion Retailer PacSun
The label alleges unauthorized use of 290+ works on TikTok, Instagram

Rod Yates
Policy
Dec 3, 2025

Jorja Smith’s Label Hits Back at ‘I Run,’ Demands Cut of the Track
FAMM claims the song infringes Smith’s rights

Rod Yates
Policy
Dec 3, 2025

Daddy Yankee Files Lawsuit Against Raphy Pina Over Allegedly Diverted Royalties
The suit claims that the Puerto Rican artist is owed millions from his former manager

Harry Levin
Policy
Dec 2, 2025

Music Fans in Quebec Reject Plan For French-Language Streaming Quotas
Bill 109 seeks to “affirm the cultural sovereignty” of the French-Canadian province

Rod Yates
Policy
Dec 1, 2025

Former Cradle of Filth Members Launch Legal Action Against Vocalist Dani Filth
The move follows the departures of keyboardist Zoe Marie Federoff and guitarist Marek ‘Ashok’ Šmerda

Rod Yates
Policy
Dec 1, 2025




