


Verizon and Google Seek to Pause Copyright Infringement Litigation
The companies want the Cox Communications case to reach its conclusion
Verizon and Google have made separate applications to have their respective copyright infringement cases put on hold, arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Cox Communications litigation could have ramifications for their cases.
Some context:
In 2019 Warner Music Group, Universal Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment sued Cox Communications over its subscribers’ alleged repeat copyright infringements.
Though the labels were initially victorious, last month the Supreme Court agreed to review the case.
The result could have major ramifications for similar lawsuits.
Verizon’s argument:
The major labels sued Verizon in July 2024 over its subscribers’ alleged copyright infringements.
As per Digital Music News (DMN), in their recently submitted letter to the court Verizon argue, “The Cox petition presents the same issue as Verizon’s pending motion to dismiss: whether an internet service provider (ISP) can be contributorily liable when others allegedly use its internet service to commit copyright infringement.”
Arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Cox case “will control this Court’s decision,” Verizon has requested a stay in proceedings.
The labels oppose the motion.
A ruling in the Cox case isn’t expected until midway through 2026.
Google’s argument:
Google is being sued by text publishers such as Cengage and Macmillan, which allege it didn’t do enough to prevent piracy, and even profited from it.
Though the publishers’ vicarious liability claim was dismissed, the claim for contributory infringement is ongoing.
Google is requesting a stay in that litigation until the Supreme Court’s Cox ruling, arguing it could have an impact on its lawsuit, and potentially determine the outcome.
Verizon and Google have made separate applications to have their respective copyright infringement cases put on hold, arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Cox Communications litigation could have ramifications for their cases.
Some context:
In 2019 Warner Music Group, Universal Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment sued Cox Communications over its subscribers’ alleged repeat copyright infringements.
Though the labels were initially victorious, last month the Supreme Court agreed to review the case.
The result could have major ramifications for similar lawsuits.
Verizon’s argument:
The major labels sued Verizon in July 2024 over its subscribers’ alleged copyright infringements.
As per Digital Music News (DMN), in their recently submitted letter to the court Verizon argue, “The Cox petition presents the same issue as Verizon’s pending motion to dismiss: whether an internet service provider (ISP) can be contributorily liable when others allegedly use its internet service to commit copyright infringement.”
Arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Cox case “will control this Court’s decision,” Verizon has requested a stay in proceedings.
The labels oppose the motion.
A ruling in the Cox case isn’t expected until midway through 2026.
Google’s argument:
Google is being sued by text publishers such as Cengage and Macmillan, which allege it didn’t do enough to prevent piracy, and even profited from it.
Though the publishers’ vicarious liability claim was dismissed, the claim for contributory infringement is ongoing.
Google is requesting a stay in that litigation until the Supreme Court’s Cox ruling, arguing it could have an impact on its lawsuit, and potentially determine the outcome.
Verizon and Google have made separate applications to have their respective copyright infringement cases put on hold, arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Cox Communications litigation could have ramifications for their cases.
Some context:
In 2019 Warner Music Group, Universal Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment sued Cox Communications over its subscribers’ alleged repeat copyright infringements.
Though the labels were initially victorious, last month the Supreme Court agreed to review the case.
The result could have major ramifications for similar lawsuits.
Verizon’s argument:
The major labels sued Verizon in July 2024 over its subscribers’ alleged copyright infringements.
As per Digital Music News (DMN), in their recently submitted letter to the court Verizon argue, “The Cox petition presents the same issue as Verizon’s pending motion to dismiss: whether an internet service provider (ISP) can be contributorily liable when others allegedly use its internet service to commit copyright infringement.”
Arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Cox case “will control this Court’s decision,” Verizon has requested a stay in proceedings.
The labels oppose the motion.
A ruling in the Cox case isn’t expected until midway through 2026.
Google’s argument:
Google is being sued by text publishers such as Cengage and Macmillan, which allege it didn’t do enough to prevent piracy, and even profited from it.
Though the publishers’ vicarious liability claim was dismissed, the claim for contributory infringement is ongoing.
Google is requesting a stay in that litigation until the Supreme Court’s Cox ruling, arguing it could have an impact on its lawsuit, and potentially determine the outcome.
Verizon
Cox Communications
Warner Music Group
Sony Music Entertainment
Cengage
Macmillan
Digital Music News
Universal Music Group (UMG)
WMG
ISP Copyright Liability
Music Copyright Litigation
Industry Litigation
Major Labels Vs Content Platforms
Legal Challenges For Social Media Platforms
Supreme Court Precedent Impact
Copyright Infringement
ISP Liability
Litigation
Major Labels
Vicarious Liability
Contributory Infringement
Litigation Stay
United States
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This story was written with information sourced from Digital Music News.
- We covered it because of the industry interest in the Cox Communications case and its potential impact on other copyright litigation.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Jan 16, 2026
1 min read
Australian Radio Royalty Rates Set to Jump by 38%
The new rate is back dated to July 2023

Policy & Legal
Jan 14, 2026
1 min read
Bandcamp Lays Out Ban on AI-Generated Music
Bandcamp is the first major music store to present such restrictions

Policy & Legal
Jan 14, 2026
1 min read
US Judge Upholds Landmark Ruling That Songwriters Can Reclaim Their Copyrights Worldwide
The precedent was set by songwriter Cyril Vetter taking back global ownership of the 1963 song “Double Shot (Of My Baby’s Love)” from publisher Resnik Music Group

Australian Radio Royalty Rates Set to Jump by 38%
The new rate is back dated to July 2023

Rod Yates
Policy
Jan 16, 2026

Bandcamp Lays Out Ban on AI-Generated Music
Bandcamp is the first major music store to present such restrictions

Harry Levin
Policy
Jan 14, 2026

US Judge Upholds Landmark Ruling That Songwriters Can Reclaim Their Copyrights Worldwide
The precedent was set by songwriter Cyril Vetter taking back global ownership of the 1963 song “Double Shot (Of My Baby’s Love)” from publisher Resnik Music Group

Harry Levin
Policy
Jan 14, 2026

Lizzo Reaches Settlement in Copyright Case Tied to Unreleased Song
The track referenced Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle ad campaign

Rod Yates
Policy
Jan 13, 2026

Over 130 Music Professionals Demand EU Action on Unauthorized Ticket Resales
Signatories to the open letter include reps for A-list artists such as Radiohead, Oasis, and Ed Sheeran

Harry Levin
Policy
Jan 12, 2026

Elon Musk’s X Sues NMPA, 18 Publishers as Licensing Dispute Widens
The platform alleges collusion and anti-competitive behavior

Rod Yates
Policy
Jan 12, 2026




