


Verizon and Google Seek to Pause Copyright Infringement Litigation
The companies want the Cox Communications case to reach its conclusion
Verizon and Google have made separate applications to have their respective copyright infringement cases put on hold, arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Cox Communications litigation could have ramifications for their cases.
Some context:
In 2019 Warner Music Group, Universal Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment sued Cox Communications over its subscribers’ alleged repeat copyright infringements.
Though the labels were initially victorious, last month the Supreme Court agreed to review the case.
The result could have major ramifications for similar lawsuits.
Verizon’s argument:
The major labels sued Verizon in July 2024 over its subscribers’ alleged copyright infringements.
As per Digital Music News (DMN), in their recently submitted letter to the court Verizon argue, “The Cox petition presents the same issue as Verizon’s pending motion to dismiss: whether an internet service provider (ISP) can be contributorily liable when others allegedly use its internet service to commit copyright infringement.”
Arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Cox case “will control this Court’s decision,” Verizon has requested a stay in proceedings.
The labels oppose the motion.
A ruling in the Cox case isn’t expected until midway through 2026.
Google’s argument:
Google is being sued by text publishers such as Cengage and Macmillan, which allege it didn’t do enough to prevent piracy, and even profited from it.
Though the publishers’ vicarious liability claim was dismissed, the claim for contributory infringement is ongoing.
Google is requesting a stay in that litigation until the Supreme Court’s Cox ruling, arguing it could have an impact on its lawsuit, and potentially determine the outcome.
Verizon and Google have made separate applications to have their respective copyright infringement cases put on hold, arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Cox Communications litigation could have ramifications for their cases.
Some context:
In 2019 Warner Music Group, Universal Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment sued Cox Communications over its subscribers’ alleged repeat copyright infringements.
Though the labels were initially victorious, last month the Supreme Court agreed to review the case.
The result could have major ramifications for similar lawsuits.
Verizon’s argument:
The major labels sued Verizon in July 2024 over its subscribers’ alleged copyright infringements.
As per Digital Music News (DMN), in their recently submitted letter to the court Verizon argue, “The Cox petition presents the same issue as Verizon’s pending motion to dismiss: whether an internet service provider (ISP) can be contributorily liable when others allegedly use its internet service to commit copyright infringement.”
Arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Cox case “will control this Court’s decision,” Verizon has requested a stay in proceedings.
The labels oppose the motion.
A ruling in the Cox case isn’t expected until midway through 2026.
Google’s argument:
Google is being sued by text publishers such as Cengage and Macmillan, which allege it didn’t do enough to prevent piracy, and even profited from it.
Though the publishers’ vicarious liability claim was dismissed, the claim for contributory infringement is ongoing.
Google is requesting a stay in that litigation until the Supreme Court’s Cox ruling, arguing it could have an impact on its lawsuit, and potentially determine the outcome.
Verizon and Google have made separate applications to have their respective copyright infringement cases put on hold, arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Cox Communications litigation could have ramifications for their cases.
Some context:
In 2019 Warner Music Group, Universal Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment sued Cox Communications over its subscribers’ alleged repeat copyright infringements.
Though the labels were initially victorious, last month the Supreme Court agreed to review the case.
The result could have major ramifications for similar lawsuits.
Verizon’s argument:
The major labels sued Verizon in July 2024 over its subscribers’ alleged copyright infringements.
As per Digital Music News (DMN), in their recently submitted letter to the court Verizon argue, “The Cox petition presents the same issue as Verizon’s pending motion to dismiss: whether an internet service provider (ISP) can be contributorily liable when others allegedly use its internet service to commit copyright infringement.”
Arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Cox case “will control this Court’s decision,” Verizon has requested a stay in proceedings.
The labels oppose the motion.
A ruling in the Cox case isn’t expected until midway through 2026.
Google’s argument:
Google is being sued by text publishers such as Cengage and Macmillan, which allege it didn’t do enough to prevent piracy, and even profited from it.
Though the publishers’ vicarious liability claim was dismissed, the claim for contributory infringement is ongoing.
Google is requesting a stay in that litigation until the Supreme Court’s Cox ruling, arguing it could have an impact on its lawsuit, and potentially determine the outcome.
Verizon
Cox Communications
Warner Music Group
Sony Music Entertainment
Cengage
Macmillan
Digital Music News
Universal Music Group (UMG)
WMG
ISP Copyright Liability
Music Copyright Litigation
Industry Litigation
Major Labels Vs Content Platforms
Legal Challenges For Social Media Platforms
Supreme Court Precedent Impact
Copyright Infringement
ISP Liability
Litigation
Major Labels
Vicarious Liability
Contributory Infringement
Litigation Stay
United States
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This story was written with information sourced from Digital Music News.
- We covered it because of the industry interest in the Cox Communications case and its potential impact on other copyright litigation.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Oct 10, 2025
1 min read
Judge Dismisses Drake’s Lawsuit Against Kendrick Lamar and UMG
The lawsuit pertained to defamation charges surrounding “Not Like Us,” Lamar’s diss track against Drake

Policy & Legal
Oct 8, 2025
1 min read
Live Nation’s Appeal in Antitrust Suit Rejected by Supreme Court
This rejection means the case will officially be going to trial

Policy & Legal
Oct 7, 2025
1 min read
Sony Music Publishing and Lola Young Initiate Legal Proceedings Against Carter Lang
Lang claims he was not properly credited as a songwriter on four of Young’s songs

Judge Dismisses Drake’s Lawsuit Against Kendrick Lamar and UMG
The lawsuit pertained to defamation charges surrounding “Not Like Us,” Lamar’s diss track against Drake

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 10, 2025

Live Nation’s Appeal in Antitrust Suit Rejected by Supreme Court
This rejection means the case will officially be going to trial

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 8, 2025

Sony Music Publishing and Lola Young Initiate Legal Proceedings Against Carter Lang
Lang claims he was not properly credited as a songwriter on four of Young’s songs

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 7, 2025

Independent Music Professionals Launch 100 Voices Campaign to Oppose UMG Acquiring Downtown
The European Commission is currently investigating the deal’s effect on fair competition in the music industry

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 6, 2025

Live Nation/Ticketmaster Lawsuits May Pause During Government Shutdown
The Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission moved to stall the proceedings

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 6, 2025

Rod Wave Sued for $27 Million Over Canceled Tour Dates
The lawsuit claims the rapper/singer owes that money to the tour's promoter, Grizzly Touring

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 2, 2025