


Supreme Court to Consider Cox Communications’ Appeal in Music Piracy Case
The verdict could have significant ramifications for the fight against illegal downloading of music
The Supreme Court has announced it will hear an appeal by internet provider Cox Communications over the guilty verdict it received in 2019 concerning copyright infringement by its subscribers.
Some background:
In 2018 more than 50 music companies – including Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment (the lead plaintiff) – sued Cox, alleging it failed to stop its users from illegally downloading music.
In 2019 a jury in federal court in Virginia, Alexandria, declared Cox guilty and the company was fined approximately $1 billion.
As per Reuters, in early 2024 the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the “willful contributory infringement” part of the decision, “finding that the company committed secondary copyright infringement by failing to address user piracy.”
It did, however, overturn the “vicarious liability verdict,” cancelling the $1 billion fine and ordering a new trial to determine appropriate damages.
In August 2024 Cox filed to have the original verdict overturned at the Supreme Court, stating that if the jury’s decision were to stand it would force ISPs to terminate internet access for “entire households, coffee shops, hospitals, universities” due to unproven allegations of infringing activity.
In May this year President Donald Trump’s Solicitor General John Sauer filed an amicus brief in support of Cox Communications; the record companies responded by calling his argument “bewildering.”
The Supreme Court will hear the case during its October term.
Failed appeal:
As per Music Business Worldwide (MBW), the Court “declined to hear an appeal by the record companies asking the top court to greenlight a new trial that would leave in place the guilty verdict and determine the damages Cox would be required to pay.”
The implications:
As per MBW, if the Supreme Court finds in favor of Cox, “it could mean new protections for internet service providers that would shield them from liability for piracy committed by subscribers.”
This in turn could impact other cases that music companies have brought against ISPs in the US, including a $2.6 billion case brought against Verizon by Sony, Universal, Warner and ABKCO Music.
The Supreme Court has announced it will hear an appeal by internet provider Cox Communications over the guilty verdict it received in 2019 concerning copyright infringement by its subscribers.
Some background:
In 2018 more than 50 music companies – including Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment (the lead plaintiff) – sued Cox, alleging it failed to stop its users from illegally downloading music.
In 2019 a jury in federal court in Virginia, Alexandria, declared Cox guilty and the company was fined approximately $1 billion.
As per Reuters, in early 2024 the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the “willful contributory infringement” part of the decision, “finding that the company committed secondary copyright infringement by failing to address user piracy.”
It did, however, overturn the “vicarious liability verdict,” cancelling the $1 billion fine and ordering a new trial to determine appropriate damages.
In August 2024 Cox filed to have the original verdict overturned at the Supreme Court, stating that if the jury’s decision were to stand it would force ISPs to terminate internet access for “entire households, coffee shops, hospitals, universities” due to unproven allegations of infringing activity.
In May this year President Donald Trump’s Solicitor General John Sauer filed an amicus brief in support of Cox Communications; the record companies responded by calling his argument “bewildering.”
The Supreme Court will hear the case during its October term.
Failed appeal:
As per Music Business Worldwide (MBW), the Court “declined to hear an appeal by the record companies asking the top court to greenlight a new trial that would leave in place the guilty verdict and determine the damages Cox would be required to pay.”
The implications:
As per MBW, if the Supreme Court finds in favor of Cox, “it could mean new protections for internet service providers that would shield them from liability for piracy committed by subscribers.”
This in turn could impact other cases that music companies have brought against ISPs in the US, including a $2.6 billion case brought against Verizon by Sony, Universal, Warner and ABKCO Music.
The Supreme Court has announced it will hear an appeal by internet provider Cox Communications over the guilty verdict it received in 2019 concerning copyright infringement by its subscribers.
Some background:
In 2018 more than 50 music companies – including Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment (the lead plaintiff) – sued Cox, alleging it failed to stop its users from illegally downloading music.
In 2019 a jury in federal court in Virginia, Alexandria, declared Cox guilty and the company was fined approximately $1 billion.
As per Reuters, in early 2024 the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the “willful contributory infringement” part of the decision, “finding that the company committed secondary copyright infringement by failing to address user piracy.”
It did, however, overturn the “vicarious liability verdict,” cancelling the $1 billion fine and ordering a new trial to determine appropriate damages.
In August 2024 Cox filed to have the original verdict overturned at the Supreme Court, stating that if the jury’s decision were to stand it would force ISPs to terminate internet access for “entire households, coffee shops, hospitals, universities” due to unproven allegations of infringing activity.
In May this year President Donald Trump’s Solicitor General John Sauer filed an amicus brief in support of Cox Communications; the record companies responded by calling his argument “bewildering.”
The Supreme Court will hear the case during its October term.
Failed appeal:
As per Music Business Worldwide (MBW), the Court “declined to hear an appeal by the record companies asking the top court to greenlight a new trial that would leave in place the guilty verdict and determine the damages Cox would be required to pay.”
The implications:
As per MBW, if the Supreme Court finds in favor of Cox, “it could mean new protections for internet service providers that would shield them from liability for piracy committed by subscribers.”
This in turn could impact other cases that music companies have brought against ISPs in the US, including a $2.6 billion case brought against Verizon by Sony, Universal, Warner and ABKCO Music.
Cox Communications
Supreme Court
Warner Music Group
Sony Music Entertainment
John Sauer
Reuters
Music Business Worldwide
Verizon
ABKCO Music
ISP Copyright Liability
Music Copyright Litigation
Industry Litigation
Legal and Litigation Updates
Major Labels Vs Content Platforms
AI and Copyright
Copyright Infringement
Litigation
Vicarious Liability
Major Labels
Policy & Legal
Legal Disputes
ISP Liability
United States
Alexandria, US
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This story was written with information sourced from Reuters, Music Business Worldwide and Variety.
- We covered it because of the profiles of the parties involved and the implications of the appeal for existing and future music copyright cases.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Jun 27, 2025
1 min read
Court Issues Another Fair Use Ruling Backing AI Developers
Meta gets a summary judgment win against authors, including Sarah Silverman

Policy & Legal
Jun 26, 2025
1 min read
Songwriters Guild and SCL Submit Brief in Pivotal Copyright Termination Lawsuit
The case hinges on whether US copyright terminations extend to international markets

Policy & Legal
Jun 26, 2025
1 min read
Court’s Ruling on Anthropic AI Case May Have Ramifications for Music Industry
Anthropic’s use of copyrighted books to train AI has been deemed “fair use”

Court Issues Another Fair Use Ruling Backing AI Developers
Meta gets a summary judgment win against authors, including Sarah Silverman

Rod Yates
Policy
Jun 27, 2025

Songwriters Guild and SCL Submit Brief in Pivotal Copyright Termination Lawsuit
The case hinges on whether US copyright terminations extend to international markets

Rod Yates
Policy
Jun 26, 2025

Court’s Ruling on Anthropic AI Case May Have Ramifications for Music Industry
Anthropic’s use of copyrighted books to train AI has been deemed “fair use”

Rod Yates
Policy
Jun 26, 2025

Spotify’s Bundling Subscriptions Again Under the Spotlight
US Senators urge the FTC to investigate

Rod Yates
Policy
Jun 23, 2025

EU Watchdog to Rule on Universal Music's Downtown Acquisition
The watchdog sets a July 22 review date for its initial decision

Rod Yates
Policy
Jun 18, 2025

StubHub To Leave The UK?
The secondary ticketing giant is threatening action should a price cap be implemented

Rod Yates
Policy
Jun 17, 2025