


Supreme Court to Consider Cox Communications’ Appeal in Music Piracy Case
The verdict could have significant ramifications for the fight against illegal downloading of music
The Supreme Court has announced it will hear an appeal by internet provider Cox Communications over the guilty verdict it received in 2019 concerning copyright infringement by its subscribers.
Some background:
In 2018 more than 50 music companies – including Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment (the lead plaintiff) – sued Cox, alleging it failed to stop its users from illegally downloading music.
In 2019 a jury in federal court in Virginia, Alexandria, declared Cox guilty and the company was fined approximately $1 billion.
As per Reuters, in early 2024 the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the “willful contributory infringement” part of the decision, “finding that the company committed secondary copyright infringement by failing to address user piracy.”
It did, however, overturn the “vicarious liability verdict,” cancelling the $1 billion fine and ordering a new trial to determine appropriate damages.
In August 2024 Cox filed to have the original verdict overturned at the Supreme Court, stating that if the jury’s decision were to stand it would force ISPs to terminate internet access for “entire households, coffee shops, hospitals, universities” due to unproven allegations of infringing activity.
In May this year President Donald Trump’s Solicitor General John Sauer filed an amicus brief in support of Cox Communications; the record companies responded by calling his argument “bewildering.”
The Supreme Court will hear the case during its October term.
Failed appeal:
As per Music Business Worldwide (MBW), the Court “declined to hear an appeal by the record companies asking the top court to greenlight a new trial that would leave in place the guilty verdict and determine the damages Cox would be required to pay.”
The implications:
As per MBW, if the Supreme Court finds in favor of Cox, “it could mean new protections for internet service providers that would shield them from liability for piracy committed by subscribers.”
This in turn could impact other cases that music companies have brought against ISPs in the US, including a $2.6 billion case brought against Verizon by Sony, Universal, Warner and ABKCO Music.
The Supreme Court has announced it will hear an appeal by internet provider Cox Communications over the guilty verdict it received in 2019 concerning copyright infringement by its subscribers.
Some background:
In 2018 more than 50 music companies – including Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment (the lead plaintiff) – sued Cox, alleging it failed to stop its users from illegally downloading music.
In 2019 a jury in federal court in Virginia, Alexandria, declared Cox guilty and the company was fined approximately $1 billion.
As per Reuters, in early 2024 the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the “willful contributory infringement” part of the decision, “finding that the company committed secondary copyright infringement by failing to address user piracy.”
It did, however, overturn the “vicarious liability verdict,” cancelling the $1 billion fine and ordering a new trial to determine appropriate damages.
In August 2024 Cox filed to have the original verdict overturned at the Supreme Court, stating that if the jury’s decision were to stand it would force ISPs to terminate internet access for “entire households, coffee shops, hospitals, universities” due to unproven allegations of infringing activity.
In May this year President Donald Trump’s Solicitor General John Sauer filed an amicus brief in support of Cox Communications; the record companies responded by calling his argument “bewildering.”
The Supreme Court will hear the case during its October term.
Failed appeal:
As per Music Business Worldwide (MBW), the Court “declined to hear an appeal by the record companies asking the top court to greenlight a new trial that would leave in place the guilty verdict and determine the damages Cox would be required to pay.”
The implications:
As per MBW, if the Supreme Court finds in favor of Cox, “it could mean new protections for internet service providers that would shield them from liability for piracy committed by subscribers.”
This in turn could impact other cases that music companies have brought against ISPs in the US, including a $2.6 billion case brought against Verizon by Sony, Universal, Warner and ABKCO Music.
The Supreme Court has announced it will hear an appeal by internet provider Cox Communications over the guilty verdict it received in 2019 concerning copyright infringement by its subscribers.
Some background:
In 2018 more than 50 music companies – including Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment (the lead plaintiff) – sued Cox, alleging it failed to stop its users from illegally downloading music.
In 2019 a jury in federal court in Virginia, Alexandria, declared Cox guilty and the company was fined approximately $1 billion.
As per Reuters, in early 2024 the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the “willful contributory infringement” part of the decision, “finding that the company committed secondary copyright infringement by failing to address user piracy.”
It did, however, overturn the “vicarious liability verdict,” cancelling the $1 billion fine and ordering a new trial to determine appropriate damages.
In August 2024 Cox filed to have the original verdict overturned at the Supreme Court, stating that if the jury’s decision were to stand it would force ISPs to terminate internet access for “entire households, coffee shops, hospitals, universities” due to unproven allegations of infringing activity.
In May this year President Donald Trump’s Solicitor General John Sauer filed an amicus brief in support of Cox Communications; the record companies responded by calling his argument “bewildering.”
The Supreme Court will hear the case during its October term.
Failed appeal:
As per Music Business Worldwide (MBW), the Court “declined to hear an appeal by the record companies asking the top court to greenlight a new trial that would leave in place the guilty verdict and determine the damages Cox would be required to pay.”
The implications:
As per MBW, if the Supreme Court finds in favor of Cox, “it could mean new protections for internet service providers that would shield them from liability for piracy committed by subscribers.”
This in turn could impact other cases that music companies have brought against ISPs in the US, including a $2.6 billion case brought against Verizon by Sony, Universal, Warner and ABKCO Music.
Cox Communications
Supreme Court
Warner Music Group
Sony Music Entertainment
John Sauer
Reuters
Music Business Worldwide
Verizon
ABKCO Music
ISP Copyright Liability
Music Copyright Litigation
Industry Litigation
Legal and Litigation Updates
Major Labels Vs Content Platforms
AI and Copyright
Copyright Infringement
Litigation
Vicarious Liability
Major Labels
Policy & Legal
Legal Disputes
ISP Liability
United States
Alexandria, US
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This story was written with information sourced from Reuters, Music Business Worldwide and Variety.
- We covered it because of the profiles of the parties involved and the implications of the appeal for existing and future music copyright cases.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Nov 14, 2025
1 min read
Radiohead, Coldplay, and Other Major UK Artists Call for Ticket Price Cap
The headlining acts signed an open letter to the government requesting a cap on resale ticket prices

Policy & Legal
Nov 13, 2025
1 min read
Downtown Music Holdings Faces New $375 Million Lawsuit Amidst UMG Deal Probe
YouTube royalty platform Blast Off Media filed the new lawsuit

Policy & Legal
Nov 11, 2025
1 min read
German Court Rules ChatGPT Illegally Used Song Lyrics for AI Training
This is the first time a court in Europe has ruled in favor of creators whose works were used to train generative AI

Radiohead, Coldplay, and Other Major UK Artists Call for Ticket Price Cap
The headlining acts signed an open letter to the government requesting a cap on resale ticket prices

Harry Levin
Policy
Nov 14, 2025

Downtown Music Holdings Faces New $375 Million Lawsuit Amidst UMG Deal Probe
YouTube royalty platform Blast Off Media filed the new lawsuit

Harry Levin
Policy
Nov 13, 2025

German Court Rules ChatGPT Illegally Used Song Lyrics for AI Training
This is the first time a court in Europe has ruled in favor of creators whose works were used to train generative AI

Harry Levin
Policy
Nov 11, 2025

Music Publishers Move to Reopen Lawsuit Against the NBA
The complaint states that the professional sports organization illegally used music in social media videos

Harry Levin
Policy
Nov 10, 2025

Spotify Faces Class Action Lawsuit Alleging “Pay For Play” Discovery Mode
The claim states that third-party payments can influence music placements in Discovery Mode and editorial playlists

Harry Levin
Policy
Nov 6, 2025

Suno Sued by Danish Songwriter Collecting Society Koda
It alleges “the biggest theft in music history”

Rod Yates
Policy
Nov 5, 2025



