


Supreme Court to Consider Cox Communications’ Appeal in Music Piracy Case
The verdict could have significant ramifications for the fight against illegal downloading of music
The Supreme Court has announced it will hear an appeal by internet provider Cox Communications over the guilty verdict it received in 2019 concerning copyright infringement by its subscribers.
Some background:
In 2018 more than 50 music companies – including Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment (the lead plaintiff) – sued Cox, alleging it failed to stop its users from illegally downloading music.
In 2019 a jury in federal court in Virginia, Alexandria, declared Cox guilty and the company was fined approximately $1 billion.
As per Reuters, in early 2024 the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the “willful contributory infringement” part of the decision, “finding that the company committed secondary copyright infringement by failing to address user piracy.”
It did, however, overturn the “vicarious liability verdict,” cancelling the $1 billion fine and ordering a new trial to determine appropriate damages.
In August 2024 Cox filed to have the original verdict overturned at the Supreme Court, stating that if the jury’s decision were to stand it would force ISPs to terminate internet access for “entire households, coffee shops, hospitals, universities” due to unproven allegations of infringing activity.
In May this year President Donald Trump’s Solicitor General John Sauer filed an amicus brief in support of Cox Communications; the record companies responded by calling his argument “bewildering.”
The Supreme Court will hear the case during its October term.
Failed appeal:
As per Music Business Worldwide (MBW), the Court “declined to hear an appeal by the record companies asking the top court to greenlight a new trial that would leave in place the guilty verdict and determine the damages Cox would be required to pay.”
The implications:
As per MBW, if the Supreme Court finds in favor of Cox, “it could mean new protections for internet service providers that would shield them from liability for piracy committed by subscribers.”
This in turn could impact other cases that music companies have brought against ISPs in the US, including a $2.6 billion case brought against Verizon by Sony, Universal, Warner and ABKCO Music.
The Supreme Court has announced it will hear an appeal by internet provider Cox Communications over the guilty verdict it received in 2019 concerning copyright infringement by its subscribers.
Some background:
In 2018 more than 50 music companies – including Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment (the lead plaintiff) – sued Cox, alleging it failed to stop its users from illegally downloading music.
In 2019 a jury in federal court in Virginia, Alexandria, declared Cox guilty and the company was fined approximately $1 billion.
As per Reuters, in early 2024 the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the “willful contributory infringement” part of the decision, “finding that the company committed secondary copyright infringement by failing to address user piracy.”
It did, however, overturn the “vicarious liability verdict,” cancelling the $1 billion fine and ordering a new trial to determine appropriate damages.
In August 2024 Cox filed to have the original verdict overturned at the Supreme Court, stating that if the jury’s decision were to stand it would force ISPs to terminate internet access for “entire households, coffee shops, hospitals, universities” due to unproven allegations of infringing activity.
In May this year President Donald Trump’s Solicitor General John Sauer filed an amicus brief in support of Cox Communications; the record companies responded by calling his argument “bewildering.”
The Supreme Court will hear the case during its October term.
Failed appeal:
As per Music Business Worldwide (MBW), the Court “declined to hear an appeal by the record companies asking the top court to greenlight a new trial that would leave in place the guilty verdict and determine the damages Cox would be required to pay.”
The implications:
As per MBW, if the Supreme Court finds in favor of Cox, “it could mean new protections for internet service providers that would shield them from liability for piracy committed by subscribers.”
This in turn could impact other cases that music companies have brought against ISPs in the US, including a $2.6 billion case brought against Verizon by Sony, Universal, Warner and ABKCO Music.
The Supreme Court has announced it will hear an appeal by internet provider Cox Communications over the guilty verdict it received in 2019 concerning copyright infringement by its subscribers.
Some background:
In 2018 more than 50 music companies – including Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment (the lead plaintiff) – sued Cox, alleging it failed to stop its users from illegally downloading music.
In 2019 a jury in federal court in Virginia, Alexandria, declared Cox guilty and the company was fined approximately $1 billion.
As per Reuters, in early 2024 the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the “willful contributory infringement” part of the decision, “finding that the company committed secondary copyright infringement by failing to address user piracy.”
It did, however, overturn the “vicarious liability verdict,” cancelling the $1 billion fine and ordering a new trial to determine appropriate damages.
In August 2024 Cox filed to have the original verdict overturned at the Supreme Court, stating that if the jury’s decision were to stand it would force ISPs to terminate internet access for “entire households, coffee shops, hospitals, universities” due to unproven allegations of infringing activity.
In May this year President Donald Trump’s Solicitor General John Sauer filed an amicus brief in support of Cox Communications; the record companies responded by calling his argument “bewildering.”
The Supreme Court will hear the case during its October term.
Failed appeal:
As per Music Business Worldwide (MBW), the Court “declined to hear an appeal by the record companies asking the top court to greenlight a new trial that would leave in place the guilty verdict and determine the damages Cox would be required to pay.”
The implications:
As per MBW, if the Supreme Court finds in favor of Cox, “it could mean new protections for internet service providers that would shield them from liability for piracy committed by subscribers.”
This in turn could impact other cases that music companies have brought against ISPs in the US, including a $2.6 billion case brought against Verizon by Sony, Universal, Warner and ABKCO Music.
Cox Communications
Supreme Court
Warner Music Group
Sony Music Entertainment
John Sauer
Reuters
Music Business Worldwide
Verizon
ABKCO Music
ISP Copyright Liability
Music Copyright Litigation
Industry Litigation
Legal and Litigation Updates
Major Labels Vs Content Platforms
AI and Copyright
Copyright Infringement
Litigation
Vicarious Liability
Major Labels
Policy & Legal
Legal Disputes
ISP Liability
United States
Alexandria, US
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This story was written with information sourced from Reuters, Music Business Worldwide and Variety.
- We covered it because of the profiles of the parties involved and the implications of the appeal for existing and future music copyright cases.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Aug 15, 2025
1 min read
UMG CEO Sir Lucian Grainge Responds to Drake’s Defamation Lawsuit
In a recent motion, Drake requested documents directly from Grainge

Policy & Legal
Aug 15, 2025
1 min read
Lewis Capaldi Ticket Scalping Increases Scrutiny on StubHub
The Scottish singer is the latest artist to be targeted by ticket scalpers

Policy & Legal
Aug 14, 2025
1 min read
Drake Urges UMG to Reveal Kendrick Lamar’s Contract in Defamation Lawsuit
This comes after the court approved Drake’s legal team serving a subpoena to Kojo Menne Asamoah

UMG CEO Sir Lucian Grainge Responds to Drake’s Defamation Lawsuit
In a recent motion, Drake requested documents directly from Grainge

Harry Levin
Policy
Aug 15, 2025

Lewis Capaldi Ticket Scalping Increases Scrutiny on StubHub
The Scottish singer is the latest artist to be targeted by ticket scalpers

Rod Yates
Policy
Aug 15, 2025

Drake Urges UMG to Reveal Kendrick Lamar’s Contract in Defamation Lawsuit
This comes after the court approved Drake’s legal team serving a subpoena to Kojo Menne Asamoah

Harry Levin
Policy
Aug 14, 2025

Spotify Facing Bribery Allegations in Turkey
The accusations follow increased regulatory pressure on the service

Rod Yates
Policy
Aug 14, 2025

MF DOOM’s Estate Sues Temu for Alleged Merch Fakes
The rapper’s name and likeness is being used without permission

Rod Yates
Policy
Aug 13, 2025

Court Approves Drake’s Motion to Subpoena Kojo Menne Asamoah
This new development is part of Drake’s defamation suit against UMG in relation to the Kendrick Lamar song, “Not Like Us”

Harry Levin
Policy
Aug 11, 2025