


Juice Entertainment Responds to DOJ and FTC Inquiry with Official Letter
The promoter has been locked in a lengthy lawsuit with Live Nation
New Jersey promoter Juice Entertainment has submitted an official response to the public inquiry led by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and US Department of Justice (DOJ) into “unfair and anticompetitive practices in live entertainment.” It follows comments submitted by the National Independent Venue Association (NIVA), which called for Live Nation to be broken into four different companies alongside a raft of other suggested changes.
Background:
Juice Entertainment has been locked in a lawsuit with Live Nation for 15 years.
As per its website, the company had planned to host what they claim would have been “the largest electronic dance music festival on the East Coast.”
They allege that Live Nation attempted to force them into a partnership, and used “strong-arm tactics” to prevent it from proceeding when Juice refused.
The lawsuit is currently before the US Federal Court for the District of New Jersey.
The letter:
In its letter to the inquiry Juice alleges Live Nation has “engaged in fraud, monopolistic behavior, deceptive business practices and corporate espionage.”
New Jersey promoter Juice Entertainment has submitted an official response to the public inquiry led by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and US Department of Justice (DOJ) into “unfair and anticompetitive practices in live entertainment.” It follows comments submitted by the National Independent Venue Association (NIVA), which called for Live Nation to be broken into four different companies alongside a raft of other suggested changes.
Background:
Juice Entertainment has been locked in a lawsuit with Live Nation for 15 years.
As per its website, the company had planned to host what they claim would have been “the largest electronic dance music festival on the East Coast.”
They allege that Live Nation attempted to force them into a partnership, and used “strong-arm tactics” to prevent it from proceeding when Juice refused.
The lawsuit is currently before the US Federal Court for the District of New Jersey.
The letter:
In its letter to the inquiry Juice alleges Live Nation has “engaged in fraud, monopolistic behavior, deceptive business practices and corporate espionage.”
New Jersey promoter Juice Entertainment has submitted an official response to the public inquiry led by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and US Department of Justice (DOJ) into “unfair and anticompetitive practices in live entertainment.” It follows comments submitted by the National Independent Venue Association (NIVA), which called for Live Nation to be broken into four different companies alongside a raft of other suggested changes.
Background:
Juice Entertainment has been locked in a lawsuit with Live Nation for 15 years.
As per its website, the company had planned to host what they claim would have been “the largest electronic dance music festival on the East Coast.”
They allege that Live Nation attempted to force them into a partnership, and used “strong-arm tactics” to prevent it from proceeding when Juice refused.
The lawsuit is currently before the US Federal Court for the District of New Jersey.
The letter:
In its letter to the inquiry Juice alleges Live Nation has “engaged in fraud, monopolistic behavior, deceptive business practices and corporate espionage.”
Juice Entertainment
Federal Trade Commission
US Department of Justice
National Independent Venue Association
Live Nation
Live Nation Entertainment
Antitrust Scrutiny in Live Music
Industry Litigation
Industry Response To Federal Ticketing Probe
Antitrust Enforcement In Live Music
Indie Vs Major Label Tensions
Litigation
Antitrust
Competition Inquiry
Government Scrutiny
Legal Disputes
United States
Newark, US
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This story was written with information sourced from The Ticketing Business.
- We covered it because of the ongoing scrutiny around the DOJ and FTC inquiry.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Jul 15, 2025
1 min read
Drake Prepares for Legal Showdown With UMG, Cites 63 Potential Witnesses
The list includes Sir Lucian Grainge, Monte Lipman and more

Policy & Legal
Jul 14, 2025
1 min read
Verizon and Google Seek to Pause Copyright Infringement Litigation
The companies want the Cox Communications case to reach its conclusion

Policy & Legal
Jul 14, 2025
1 min read
Justin Bieber Settles $30m Debt With Scooter Braun
The majority of the amount stems from the singer’s canceled 2022 tour

Drake Prepares for Legal Showdown With UMG, Cites 63 Potential Witnesses
The list includes Sir Lucian Grainge, Monte Lipman and more

Rod Yates
Policy
Jul 15, 2025

Verizon and Google Seek to Pause Copyright Infringement Litigation
The companies want the Cox Communications case to reach its conclusion

Rod Yates
Policy
Jul 14, 2025

Justin Bieber Settles $30m Debt With Scooter Braun
The majority of the amount stems from the singer’s canceled 2022 tour

Rod Yates
Policy
Jul 14, 2025

DSW Sues Sony, UMG, BMG Over Social Media Music Use
The lawsuit tests the legality of commercial brands using platform-licensed music

Rod Yates
Policy
Jul 11, 2025

Oak View Group CEO Tim Leiweke Steps Down Following DOJ Indictment
The DOJ indictment alleges a conspiracy to rig venue bidding

Rod Yates
Policy
Jul 10, 2025

Live Nation and NIVA State Their Cases in the DOJ & FTC Live Industry Investigation
Rivals agree on resale reform but clash on market structure

Rod Yates
Policy
Jul 9, 2025