


Anthony Field, Jeff Fatt, Murray Cook, and Greg Page
Former Wiggles CEO Sues the Children’s Entertainers
Alleges bonus and fair work breaches
Former Wiggles CEO Luke O’Neill is suing Wiggles Holdings Pty Ltd, blue Wiggle Anthony Field and general counsel Matthew Salgo.
The issue:
As per The Guardian, O’Neill is suing for not being paid a bonus relating to his work and for “multiple alleged breaches of the Fair Work Act.”
While CEO, O’Neill raised concerns about internal decision making and expenditure, including the payment of bonuses, budget pressures, and hiring decisions made without his or the company’s approval.
He alleges that in February this year Field “questioned his competence” during a staff meeting and “undermined him.”
He claims to have been excluded from an April meeting with retailer Kmart regarding the sale of Wiggles-branded toys.
In April he also raised concerns about his bonus, stating his eligibility had been impacted by budget overruns “mostly due to [Field’s] conduct.”
O’Neill’s role as CEO was terminated on 28 May 2025, which he alleges was a violation of the Fair Work Act in that it had no reasonable basis.
He claims the bonus of $86,266 he was paid around July 15 was below his legal entitlement.
The hearing:
A first case management hearing is scheduled for 8 September, to be heard by Justice Michael Lee.
The Wiggles, Field, and Salgo are yet to file a defence.
What they said:
The Wiggles (in a statement): “For 35 years, The Wiggles have been dedicated to bringing joy, learning, and high-quality children’s entertainment to families around the world. Our greatest privilege has always been helping children laugh, sing, and dance, and creating happy memories for families to share. The claim made by Luke O’Neill is currently before the Court and will be defended. It is not appropriate that we make any comment until the Defence has been filed.”
Former Wiggles CEO Luke O’Neill is suing Wiggles Holdings Pty Ltd, blue Wiggle Anthony Field and general counsel Matthew Salgo.
The issue:
As per The Guardian, O’Neill is suing for not being paid a bonus relating to his work and for “multiple alleged breaches of the Fair Work Act.”
While CEO, O’Neill raised concerns about internal decision making and expenditure, including the payment of bonuses, budget pressures, and hiring decisions made without his or the company’s approval.
He alleges that in February this year Field “questioned his competence” during a staff meeting and “undermined him.”
He claims to have been excluded from an April meeting with retailer Kmart regarding the sale of Wiggles-branded toys.
In April he also raised concerns about his bonus, stating his eligibility had been impacted by budget overruns “mostly due to [Field’s] conduct.”
O’Neill’s role as CEO was terminated on 28 May 2025, which he alleges was a violation of the Fair Work Act in that it had no reasonable basis.
He claims the bonus of $86,266 he was paid around July 15 was below his legal entitlement.
The hearing:
A first case management hearing is scheduled for 8 September, to be heard by Justice Michael Lee.
The Wiggles, Field, and Salgo are yet to file a defence.
What they said:
The Wiggles (in a statement): “For 35 years, The Wiggles have been dedicated to bringing joy, learning, and high-quality children’s entertainment to families around the world. Our greatest privilege has always been helping children laugh, sing, and dance, and creating happy memories for families to share. The claim made by Luke O’Neill is currently before the Court and will be defended. It is not appropriate that we make any comment until the Defence has been filed.”
Former Wiggles CEO Luke O’Neill is suing Wiggles Holdings Pty Ltd, blue Wiggle Anthony Field and general counsel Matthew Salgo.
The issue:
As per The Guardian, O’Neill is suing for not being paid a bonus relating to his work and for “multiple alleged breaches of the Fair Work Act.”
While CEO, O’Neill raised concerns about internal decision making and expenditure, including the payment of bonuses, budget pressures, and hiring decisions made without his or the company’s approval.
He alleges that in February this year Field “questioned his competence” during a staff meeting and “undermined him.”
He claims to have been excluded from an April meeting with retailer Kmart regarding the sale of Wiggles-branded toys.
In April he also raised concerns about his bonus, stating his eligibility had been impacted by budget overruns “mostly due to [Field’s] conduct.”
O’Neill’s role as CEO was terminated on 28 May 2025, which he alleges was a violation of the Fair Work Act in that it had no reasonable basis.
He claims the bonus of $86,266 he was paid around July 15 was below his legal entitlement.
The hearing:
A first case management hearing is scheduled for 8 September, to be heard by Justice Michael Lee.
The Wiggles, Field, and Salgo are yet to file a defence.
What they said:
The Wiggles (in a statement): “For 35 years, The Wiggles have been dedicated to bringing joy, learning, and high-quality children’s entertainment to families around the world. Our greatest privilege has always been helping children laugh, sing, and dance, and creating happy memories for families to share. The claim made by Luke O’Neill is currently before the Court and will be defended. It is not appropriate that we make any comment until the Defence has been filed.”
Luke O’Neill
The Wiggles
Anthony Field
Matthew Salgo
Wiggles Holdings Pty Ltd
Kmart
Justice Michael Lee
Artist Lawsuits and Legal Battles
High-Profile Artist Litigation
Industry Litigation
Executive Leadership Changes
Band Infighting Leads To Litigation
Executive Compensation Disputes
Litigation
Breach of Contract
Legal Disputes
Wrongful Termination Claim
Australia
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This story was written with information sourced from The Guardian and The Music Network.
- We covered it because of The Wiggles’ profile.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Oct 10, 2025
1 min read
Judge Dismisses Drake’s Lawsuit Against Kendrick Lamar and UMG
The lawsuit pertained to defamation charges surrounding “Not Like Us,” Lamar’s diss track against Drake

Policy & Legal
Oct 8, 2025
1 min read
Live Nation’s Appeal in Antitrust Suit Rejected by Supreme Court
This rejection means the case will officially be going to trial

Policy & Legal
Oct 7, 2025
1 min read
Sony Music Publishing and Lola Young Initiate Legal Proceedings Against Carter Lang
Lang claims he was not properly credited as a songwriter on four of Young’s songs

Judge Dismisses Drake’s Lawsuit Against Kendrick Lamar and UMG
The lawsuit pertained to defamation charges surrounding “Not Like Us,” Lamar’s diss track against Drake

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 10, 2025

Live Nation’s Appeal in Antitrust Suit Rejected by Supreme Court
This rejection means the case will officially be going to trial

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 8, 2025

Sony Music Publishing and Lola Young Initiate Legal Proceedings Against Carter Lang
Lang claims he was not properly credited as a songwriter on four of Young’s songs

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 7, 2025

Independent Music Professionals Launch 100 Voices Campaign to Oppose UMG Acquiring Downtown
The European Commission is currently investigating the deal’s effect on fair competition in the music industry

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 6, 2025

Live Nation/Ticketmaster Lawsuits May Pause During Government Shutdown
The Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission moved to stall the proceedings

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 6, 2025

Rod Wave Sued for $27 Million Over Canceled Tour Dates
The lawsuit claims the rapper/singer owes that money to the tour's promoter, Grizzly Touring

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 2, 2025