


StubHub Faces Class Action Lawsuit From Investors Following Poor Quarterly Earnings
The suit claims the second-hand ticket vendor misled shareholders about the health of the business after courting significant investments
StubHub is currently facing a class action lawsuit after showing disappointing numbers in its quarterly earnings report shared on November 13. This was the company’s first quarter since going public. The plaintiff claims that the company was not forthright about the state of operations upon raising $758 million in its initial public offering back in September.
The numbers:
The recent report from StubHub showed a negative cash flow of $4.6 million, with operating income 69% lower than the same quarter last year.
StubHub’s share price dropped to $14.87 by November 14.
Its lowest point was $10 on November 20.
The original IPO was $23.50.
StubHub said the slow business was due to “changes in the timing of cash receipts and payments associated with ticket sales as well as timing of payments to vendors.”
The complaint:
“Specifically, [StubHub] failed to disclose to investors that: (1) the Company was experiencing changes in the timing of payments to vendors; (2) those changes had a significant adverse impact on free cash flow, including trailing 12 months free cash flow; (3) as a result, the Company’s free cash flow reports were materially misleading; and (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, [StubHub’s] positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects, were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.”
StubHub is currently facing a class action lawsuit after showing disappointing numbers in its quarterly earnings report shared on November 13. This was the company’s first quarter since going public. The plaintiff claims that the company was not forthright about the state of operations upon raising $758 million in its initial public offering back in September.
The numbers:
The recent report from StubHub showed a negative cash flow of $4.6 million, with operating income 69% lower than the same quarter last year.
StubHub’s share price dropped to $14.87 by November 14.
Its lowest point was $10 on November 20.
The original IPO was $23.50.
StubHub said the slow business was due to “changes in the timing of cash receipts and payments associated with ticket sales as well as timing of payments to vendors.”
The complaint:
“Specifically, [StubHub] failed to disclose to investors that: (1) the Company was experiencing changes in the timing of payments to vendors; (2) those changes had a significant adverse impact on free cash flow, including trailing 12 months free cash flow; (3) as a result, the Company’s free cash flow reports were materially misleading; and (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, [StubHub’s] positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects, were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.”
StubHub is currently facing a class action lawsuit after showing disappointing numbers in its quarterly earnings report shared on November 13. This was the company’s first quarter since going public. The plaintiff claims that the company was not forthright about the state of operations upon raising $758 million in its initial public offering back in September.
The numbers:
The recent report from StubHub showed a negative cash flow of $4.6 million, with operating income 69% lower than the same quarter last year.
StubHub’s share price dropped to $14.87 by November 14.
Its lowest point was $10 on November 20.
The original IPO was $23.50.
StubHub said the slow business was due to “changes in the timing of cash receipts and payments associated with ticket sales as well as timing of payments to vendors.”
The complaint:
“Specifically, [StubHub] failed to disclose to investors that: (1) the Company was experiencing changes in the timing of payments to vendors; (2) those changes had a significant adverse impact on free cash flow, including trailing 12 months free cash flow; (3) as a result, the Company’s free cash flow reports were materially misleading; and (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, [StubHub’s] positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects, were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.”
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
This article was written with information sourced from Pollstar.
We covered it because StubHub is a major secondhand ticket vendor.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Business & Finance
Jan 14, 2026
1 min read
Kustom Entertainment Sheds Healthcare Arm to Focus on Ticketing
The company has relinquished its 51% stake in Nobility Healthcare

Business & Finance
Jan 5, 2026
1 min read
MTV Closes Dedicated Music Channels
It will focus on reality television and pop culture programming

Business & Finance
Jan 5, 2026
1 min read
Spotify to Phase Out ‘Basic’ Subscription Tier?
The move would further impact songwriter royalties

Kustom Entertainment Sheds Healthcare Arm to Focus on Ticketing
The company has relinquished its 51% stake in Nobility Healthcare

Rod Yates
Business
Jan 14, 2026

MTV Closes Dedicated Music Channels
It will focus on reality television and pop culture programming

Rod Yates
Business
Jan 5, 2026

Spotify to Phase Out ‘Basic’ Subscription Tier?
The move would further impact songwriter royalties

Rod Yates
Business
Jan 5, 2026

PPL Royalty Payouts Rise 19.9% to $72.8m in Q4 2025
The figure was boosted by international payments

Rod Yates
Business
Dec 23, 2025

Independent Music Publishers Collected €2.7bn Globally in 2024
The figure is up 5.1% YoY

Rod Yates
Business
Dec 19, 2025

Music Copyright Value Hits All-Time High of $47.2 Billion
Despite the new record, year-over-year growth is slowing

Harry Levin
Business
Dec 18, 2025





