


Universal Pictures and Warner Music Sued by Former Warner Employee
Jake Broido claims he is owed rights and royalties for his work on ‘Furious 7’ OST
Musician Jake Broido is embroiled in a legal dispute with Universal Pictures and his former employer Warner Music over his contribution to the Wiz Khalifa and Charlie Puth song “See You Again,” which featured on the Furious 7 soundtrack.
Backstory:
As per Complete Music Update (CMU), Broido says that in 2015 he was employed by a company that provided admin services to Warner Music.
Puth was working on the song that would become “See You Again” and allegedly approached Broido while he was in the Warner offices about singing gang vocals on the song.
The lawsuit alleges that Broido then contributed to both the songwriting and recording of the song.
The allegations:
Broido claims he was never given a co-writer credit, nor paid any royalties.
The US IP Rights Distribution Fund – which allocates royalties to session musicians and backing vocalists for performances of recordings on online and satellite radio services – was allegedly told by Warners that the backing vocals on the song were provided by unnamed “A&R staffers.”
Though Broido would later work for Warner, at the time of the recording he was not on staff.
He says he wasn’t asked to sign any paperwork which, says CMU, is important because “it means the label and studio can’t claim his involvement... was on a ‘work-for-hire’ basis, which under US copyright law would make the label or studio the default owner of the copyrights in the music.”
Damages:
Broido is seeking a share in the song’s publishing rights, as well as damages from Warner and Universal for breach of contract and fiduciary duty, fraudulent concealment, and what CMU terms “other unlawful conduct.”
Musician Jake Broido is embroiled in a legal dispute with Universal Pictures and his former employer Warner Music over his contribution to the Wiz Khalifa and Charlie Puth song “See You Again,” which featured on the Furious 7 soundtrack.
Backstory:
As per Complete Music Update (CMU), Broido says that in 2015 he was employed by a company that provided admin services to Warner Music.
Puth was working on the song that would become “See You Again” and allegedly approached Broido while he was in the Warner offices about singing gang vocals on the song.
The lawsuit alleges that Broido then contributed to both the songwriting and recording of the song.
The allegations:
Broido claims he was never given a co-writer credit, nor paid any royalties.
The US IP Rights Distribution Fund – which allocates royalties to session musicians and backing vocalists for performances of recordings on online and satellite radio services – was allegedly told by Warners that the backing vocals on the song were provided by unnamed “A&R staffers.”
Though Broido would later work for Warner, at the time of the recording he was not on staff.
He says he wasn’t asked to sign any paperwork which, says CMU, is important because “it means the label and studio can’t claim his involvement... was on a ‘work-for-hire’ basis, which under US copyright law would make the label or studio the default owner of the copyrights in the music.”
Damages:
Broido is seeking a share in the song’s publishing rights, as well as damages from Warner and Universal for breach of contract and fiduciary duty, fraudulent concealment, and what CMU terms “other unlawful conduct.”
Musician Jake Broido is embroiled in a legal dispute with Universal Pictures and his former employer Warner Music over his contribution to the Wiz Khalifa and Charlie Puth song “See You Again,” which featured on the Furious 7 soundtrack.
Backstory:
As per Complete Music Update (CMU), Broido says that in 2015 he was employed by a company that provided admin services to Warner Music.
Puth was working on the song that would become “See You Again” and allegedly approached Broido while he was in the Warner offices about singing gang vocals on the song.
The lawsuit alleges that Broido then contributed to both the songwriting and recording of the song.
The allegations:
Broido claims he was never given a co-writer credit, nor paid any royalties.
The US IP Rights Distribution Fund – which allocates royalties to session musicians and backing vocalists for performances of recordings on online and satellite radio services – was allegedly told by Warners that the backing vocals on the song were provided by unnamed “A&R staffers.”
Though Broido would later work for Warner, at the time of the recording he was not on staff.
He says he wasn’t asked to sign any paperwork which, says CMU, is important because “it means the label and studio can’t claim his involvement... was on a ‘work-for-hire’ basis, which under US copyright law would make the label or studio the default owner of the copyrights in the music.”
Damages:
Broido is seeking a share in the song’s publishing rights, as well as damages from Warner and Universal for breach of contract and fiduciary duty, fraudulent concealment, and what CMU terms “other unlawful conduct.”
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
This story was written with information from Complete Music Update.
We covered it because it’s news of a lawsuit featuring a major label.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Feb 3, 2026
1 min read
NIVA Slams Live Nation Expansion, Proposed Demolition of Indie Venue
Milwaukee’s Miller High Life Theatre is at risk

Policy & Legal
Feb 2, 2026
1 min read
BMG Eyes Potential Concord Acquisition
Reports suggest the US company could be valued at $7 billion

Policy & Legal
Feb 2, 2026
1 min read
Spotify to Officially Launch Operations in Istanbul
The business will be led by MD Akshat Harbola

NIVA Slams Live Nation Expansion, Proposed Demolition of Indie Venue
Milwaukee’s Miller High Life Theatre is at risk

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 3, 2026

BMG Eyes Potential Concord Acquisition
Reports suggest the US company could be valued at $7 billion

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 2, 2026

Spotify to Officially Launch Operations in Istanbul
The business will be led by MD Akshat Harbola

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 2, 2026

DistroKid Weighs Potential Sale
Reports suggest a price tag of $2 billion

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 2, 2026

Spotify, Major Labels Sue Anna’s Archive for $13 Trillion
Allege “brazen theft of... nearly all of the world’s commercial sound recordings”

Rod Yates
Policy
Jan 30, 2026

Music Publishers Sue Anthropic for $3 Billion
They allege copyright infringement of more than 20,000 songs

Rod Yates
Policy
Jan 29, 2026



