


Sir Lucian Grainge and Drake
UMG CEO Sir Lucian Grainge Responds to Drake’s Defamation Lawsuit
In a recent motion, Drake requested documents directly from Grainge
Universal Music Group (UMG) CEO and Chairman Lucian Grainge has officially commented on Drake’s defamation lawsuit against the major label, calling Drake’s claims “groundless and indeed ridiculous.” Grainge’s statement comes after Drake’s legal team requested documents directly from the CEO. They argued the materials would show Grainge played a significant role in promoting Kendrick Lamar's diss track “Not Like Us," which is the focal point of the lawsuit.
What they said:
Grange: “Whilst, as part of my role, I certainly have financial oversight of and responsibility for UMG’s global businesses, the proposition that I was involved in, much less responsible for, reviewing and approving the content of Not Like Us, its cover art or music video, or for determining or directing the promotion of those materials, is groundless and indeed ridiculous.”
UMG’s legal team: “Drake’s motion is a transparent attempt to use discovery to harass UMG and force it to waste time and resources out of spite. The premise of Drake’s motion – that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG’s corporate structure – is absurd.”
Background:
The defamation claim extends in part from the lyric in “Not Like Us,” in which Lamar calls Drake a “certified pedophile.”
Drake claims that UMG, which is both his and Lamar’s label, artificially increased streaming counts for the track through various means, including bot scams and offering lower licensing fees for the track.
Universal Music Group (UMG) CEO and Chairman Lucian Grainge has officially commented on Drake’s defamation lawsuit against the major label, calling Drake’s claims “groundless and indeed ridiculous.” Grainge’s statement comes after Drake’s legal team requested documents directly from the CEO. They argued the materials would show Grainge played a significant role in promoting Kendrick Lamar's diss track “Not Like Us," which is the focal point of the lawsuit.
What they said:
Grange: “Whilst, as part of my role, I certainly have financial oversight of and responsibility for UMG’s global businesses, the proposition that I was involved in, much less responsible for, reviewing and approving the content of Not Like Us, its cover art or music video, or for determining or directing the promotion of those materials, is groundless and indeed ridiculous.”
UMG’s legal team: “Drake’s motion is a transparent attempt to use discovery to harass UMG and force it to waste time and resources out of spite. The premise of Drake’s motion – that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG’s corporate structure – is absurd.”
Background:
The defamation claim extends in part from the lyric in “Not Like Us,” in which Lamar calls Drake a “certified pedophile.”
Drake claims that UMG, which is both his and Lamar’s label, artificially increased streaming counts for the track through various means, including bot scams and offering lower licensing fees for the track.
Universal Music Group (UMG) CEO and Chairman Lucian Grainge has officially commented on Drake’s defamation lawsuit against the major label, calling Drake’s claims “groundless and indeed ridiculous.” Grainge’s statement comes after Drake’s legal team requested documents directly from the CEO. They argued the materials would show Grainge played a significant role in promoting Kendrick Lamar's diss track “Not Like Us," which is the focal point of the lawsuit.
What they said:
Grange: “Whilst, as part of my role, I certainly have financial oversight of and responsibility for UMG’s global businesses, the proposition that I was involved in, much less responsible for, reviewing and approving the content of Not Like Us, its cover art or music video, or for determining or directing the promotion of those materials, is groundless and indeed ridiculous.”
UMG’s legal team: “Drake’s motion is a transparent attempt to use discovery to harass UMG and force it to waste time and resources out of spite. The premise of Drake’s motion – that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG’s corporate structure – is absurd.”
Background:
The defamation claim extends in part from the lyric in “Not Like Us,” in which Lamar calls Drake a “certified pedophile.”
Drake claims that UMG, which is both his and Lamar’s label, artificially increased streaming counts for the track through various means, including bot scams and offering lower licensing fees for the track.
Lucian Grainge
Drake
Kendrick Lamar
Not Like Us
Universal Music Group (UMG)
Artist vs. Label Legal Battles
High-Profile Artist Litigation
Label Liability For Artist Feuds
Artist-Led Defamation Lawsuits
Streaming Platform Corruption Allegations
Legal Scrutiny Of Major Artists
Music Industry Litigation
Litigation
Record Labels
Major Labels
Legal Disputes
Artist Defamation Lawsuit
Streaming Manipulation Allegation
United States
Canada
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This article was written with information sourced from Music Week.
- We covered it because the case involves major music industry players: Drake, Kendrick Lamar, and UMG.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Nov 17, 2025
1 min read
Paul McCartney Contributes Track to Silent Album Protesting Proposed AI Copyright Law
The Beatles legend joins artists including Hans Zimmer, Sam Fender, and Damon Albarn

Policy & Legal
Nov 17, 2025
1 min read
Live Nation’s Takeover of Pukkelpop Draws Scrutiny from Belgian Regulators
The live entertainment giant took stewardship of the festival last month

Policy & Legal
Nov 14, 2025
1 min read
Radiohead, Coldplay, and Other Major UK Artists Call for Ticket Price Cap
The headlining acts signed an open letter to the government requesting a cap on resale ticket prices

Paul McCartney Contributes Track to Silent Album Protesting Proposed AI Copyright Law
The Beatles legend joins artists including Hans Zimmer, Sam Fender, and Damon Albarn

Harry Levin
Policy
Nov 17, 2025

Live Nation’s Takeover of Pukkelpop Draws Scrutiny from Belgian Regulators
The live entertainment giant took stewardship of the festival last month

Rod Yates
Policy
Nov 17, 2025

Radiohead, Coldplay, and Other Major UK Artists Call for Ticket Price Cap
The headlining acts signed an open letter to the government requesting a cap on resale ticket prices

Harry Levin
Policy
Nov 14, 2025

Downtown Music Holdings Faces New $375 Million Lawsuit Amidst UMG Deal Probe
YouTube royalty platform Blast Off Media filed the new lawsuit

Harry Levin
Policy
Nov 13, 2025

German Court Rules ChatGPT Illegally Used Song Lyrics for AI Training
This is the first time a court in Europe has ruled in favor of creators whose works were used to train generative AI

Harry Levin
Policy
Nov 11, 2025

Music Publishers Move to Reopen Lawsuit Against the NBA
The complaint states that the professional sports organization illegally used music in social media videos

Harry Levin
Policy
Nov 10, 2025




