


Sir Lucian Grainge and Drake
UMG CEO Sir Lucian Grainge Responds to Drake’s Defamation Lawsuit
In a recent motion, Drake requested documents directly from Grainge
Universal Music Group (UMG) CEO and Chairman Lucian Grainge has officially commented on Drake’s defamation lawsuit against the major label, calling Drake’s claims “groundless and indeed ridiculous.” Grainge’s statement comes after Drake’s legal team requested documents directly from the CEO. They argued the materials would show Grainge played a significant role in promoting Kendrick Lamar's diss track “Not Like Us," which is the focal point of the lawsuit.
What they said:
Grange: “Whilst, as part of my role, I certainly have financial oversight of and responsibility for UMG’s global businesses, the proposition that I was involved in, much less responsible for, reviewing and approving the content of Not Like Us, its cover art or music video, or for determining or directing the promotion of those materials, is groundless and indeed ridiculous.”
UMG’s legal team: “Drake’s motion is a transparent attempt to use discovery to harass UMG and force it to waste time and resources out of spite. The premise of Drake’s motion – that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG’s corporate structure – is absurd.”
Background:
The defamation claim extends in part from the lyric in “Not Like Us,” in which Lamar calls Drake a “certified pedophile.”
Drake claims that UMG, which is both his and Lamar’s label, artificially increased streaming counts for the track through various means, including bot scams and offering lower licensing fees for the track.
Universal Music Group (UMG) CEO and Chairman Lucian Grainge has officially commented on Drake’s defamation lawsuit against the major label, calling Drake’s claims “groundless and indeed ridiculous.” Grainge’s statement comes after Drake’s legal team requested documents directly from the CEO. They argued the materials would show Grainge played a significant role in promoting Kendrick Lamar's diss track “Not Like Us," which is the focal point of the lawsuit.
What they said:
Grange: “Whilst, as part of my role, I certainly have financial oversight of and responsibility for UMG’s global businesses, the proposition that I was involved in, much less responsible for, reviewing and approving the content of Not Like Us, its cover art or music video, or for determining or directing the promotion of those materials, is groundless and indeed ridiculous.”
UMG’s legal team: “Drake’s motion is a transparent attempt to use discovery to harass UMG and force it to waste time and resources out of spite. The premise of Drake’s motion – that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG’s corporate structure – is absurd.”
Background:
The defamation claim extends in part from the lyric in “Not Like Us,” in which Lamar calls Drake a “certified pedophile.”
Drake claims that UMG, which is both his and Lamar’s label, artificially increased streaming counts for the track through various means, including bot scams and offering lower licensing fees for the track.
Universal Music Group (UMG) CEO and Chairman Lucian Grainge has officially commented on Drake’s defamation lawsuit against the major label, calling Drake’s claims “groundless and indeed ridiculous.” Grainge’s statement comes after Drake’s legal team requested documents directly from the CEO. They argued the materials would show Grainge played a significant role in promoting Kendrick Lamar's diss track “Not Like Us," which is the focal point of the lawsuit.
What they said:
Grange: “Whilst, as part of my role, I certainly have financial oversight of and responsibility for UMG’s global businesses, the proposition that I was involved in, much less responsible for, reviewing and approving the content of Not Like Us, its cover art or music video, or for determining or directing the promotion of those materials, is groundless and indeed ridiculous.”
UMG’s legal team: “Drake’s motion is a transparent attempt to use discovery to harass UMG and force it to waste time and resources out of spite. The premise of Drake’s motion – that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG’s corporate structure – is absurd.”
Background:
The defamation claim extends in part from the lyric in “Not Like Us,” in which Lamar calls Drake a “certified pedophile.”
Drake claims that UMG, which is both his and Lamar’s label, artificially increased streaming counts for the track through various means, including bot scams and offering lower licensing fees for the track.
Lucian Grainge
Drake
Kendrick Lamar
Not Like Us
Universal Music Group (UMG)
Artist vs. Label Legal Battles
High-Profile Artist Litigation
Label Liability For Artist Feuds
Artist-Led Defamation Lawsuits
Streaming Platform Corruption Allegations
Legal Scrutiny Of Major Artists
Music Industry Litigation
Litigation
Record Labels
Major Labels
Legal Disputes
Artist Defamation Lawsuit
Streaming Manipulation Allegation
United States
Canada
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This article was written with information sourced from Music Week.
- We covered it because the case involves major music industry players: Drake, Kendrick Lamar, and UMG.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Oct 2, 2025
1 min read
Rod Wave Sued for $27 Million Over Canceled Tour Dates
The lawsuit claims the rapper/singer owes that money to the tour's promoter, Grizzly Touring

Policy & Legal
Sep 29, 2025
1 min read
Trump Signs Executive Order for Investor Consortium to Purchase US TikTok
The order is a major step for TikTok’s legally required sale of its US assets

Policy & Legal
Sep 29, 2025
1 min read
Metro Boomin Found Not Liable on Civil Sexual Assault Charges
The producer was found not guilty on all four charges of rape and sexual battery

Rod Wave Sued for $27 Million Over Canceled Tour Dates
The lawsuit claims the rapper/singer owes that money to the tour's promoter, Grizzly Touring

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 2, 2025

Trump Signs Executive Order for Investor Consortium to Purchase US TikTok
The order is a major step for TikTok’s legally required sale of its US assets

Harry Levin
Policy
Sep 29, 2025

Metro Boomin Found Not Liable on Civil Sexual Assault Charges
The producer was found not guilty on all four charges of rape and sexual battery

Harry Levin
Policy
Sep 29, 2025

Spotify Denies Changing its Terms for Artists
Dismisses the accusations as “misinformation”

Rod Yates
Policy
Sep 26, 2025

CMA Secures Ticketmaster Pledge to Improve Fairness for Fans
The commitment follows an investigation into the Oasis reunion tour ticketing

Rod Yates
Policy
Sep 26, 2025

Major Labels Expand Suno Lawsuit to Include Piracy Claims
The move comes in the wake of Anthropic’s $1.5bn settlement

Rod Yates
Policy
Sep 23, 2025