


Sir Lucian Grainge and Drake
UMG CEO Sir Lucian Grainge Responds to Drake’s Defamation Lawsuit
In a recent motion, Drake requested documents directly from Grainge
Universal Music Group (UMG) CEO and Chairman Lucian Grainge has officially commented on Drake’s defamation lawsuit against the major label, calling Drake’s claims “groundless and indeed ridiculous.” Grainge’s statement comes after Drake’s legal team requested documents directly from the CEO. They argued the materials would show Grainge played a significant role in promoting Kendrick Lamar's diss track “Not Like Us," which is the focal point of the lawsuit.
What they said:
Grange: “Whilst, as part of my role, I certainly have financial oversight of and responsibility for UMG’s global businesses, the proposition that I was involved in, much less responsible for, reviewing and approving the content of Not Like Us, its cover art or music video, or for determining or directing the promotion of those materials, is groundless and indeed ridiculous.”
UMG’s legal team: “Drake’s motion is a transparent attempt to use discovery to harass UMG and force it to waste time and resources out of spite. The premise of Drake’s motion – that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG’s corporate structure – is absurd.”
Background:
The defamation claim extends in part from the lyric in “Not Like Us,” in which Lamar calls Drake a “certified pedophile.”
Drake claims that UMG, which is both his and Lamar’s label, artificially increased streaming counts for the track through various means, including bot scams and offering lower licensing fees for the track.
Universal Music Group (UMG) CEO and Chairman Lucian Grainge has officially commented on Drake’s defamation lawsuit against the major label, calling Drake’s claims “groundless and indeed ridiculous.” Grainge’s statement comes after Drake’s legal team requested documents directly from the CEO. They argued the materials would show Grainge played a significant role in promoting Kendrick Lamar's diss track “Not Like Us," which is the focal point of the lawsuit.
What they said:
Grange: “Whilst, as part of my role, I certainly have financial oversight of and responsibility for UMG’s global businesses, the proposition that I was involved in, much less responsible for, reviewing and approving the content of Not Like Us, its cover art or music video, or for determining or directing the promotion of those materials, is groundless and indeed ridiculous.”
UMG’s legal team: “Drake’s motion is a transparent attempt to use discovery to harass UMG and force it to waste time and resources out of spite. The premise of Drake’s motion – that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG’s corporate structure – is absurd.”
Background:
The defamation claim extends in part from the lyric in “Not Like Us,” in which Lamar calls Drake a “certified pedophile.”
Drake claims that UMG, which is both his and Lamar’s label, artificially increased streaming counts for the track through various means, including bot scams and offering lower licensing fees for the track.
Universal Music Group (UMG) CEO and Chairman Lucian Grainge has officially commented on Drake’s defamation lawsuit against the major label, calling Drake’s claims “groundless and indeed ridiculous.” Grainge’s statement comes after Drake’s legal team requested documents directly from the CEO. They argued the materials would show Grainge played a significant role in promoting Kendrick Lamar's diss track “Not Like Us," which is the focal point of the lawsuit.
What they said:
Grange: “Whilst, as part of my role, I certainly have financial oversight of and responsibility for UMG’s global businesses, the proposition that I was involved in, much less responsible for, reviewing and approving the content of Not Like Us, its cover art or music video, or for determining or directing the promotion of those materials, is groundless and indeed ridiculous.”
UMG’s legal team: “Drake’s motion is a transparent attempt to use discovery to harass UMG and force it to waste time and resources out of spite. The premise of Drake’s motion – that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG’s corporate structure – is absurd.”
Background:
The defamation claim extends in part from the lyric in “Not Like Us,” in which Lamar calls Drake a “certified pedophile.”
Drake claims that UMG, which is both his and Lamar’s label, artificially increased streaming counts for the track through various means, including bot scams and offering lower licensing fees for the track.
Lucian Grainge
Drake
Kendrick Lamar
Not Like Us
Universal Music Group (UMG)
Artist vs. Label Legal Battles
High-Profile Artist Litigation
Label Liability For Artist Feuds
Artist-Led Defamation Lawsuits
Streaming Platform Corruption Allegations
Legal Scrutiny Of Major Artists
Music Industry Litigation
Litigation
Record Labels
Major Labels
Legal Disputes
Artist Defamation Lawsuit
Streaming Manipulation Allegation
United States
Canada
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This article was written with information sourced from Music Week.
- We covered it because the case involves major music industry players: Drake, Kendrick Lamar, and UMG.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Feb 16, 2026
1 min read
UMG Acquisition of Downtown Music is Approved by European Commission
The deal, which has been severely decried by the music industry, is now able to go through

Policy & Legal
Feb 16, 2026
1 min read
PRS For Music Will Not Factor UK Grassroots Levy Into Licensing Calculations
This move will allow more money from the ticket levy to support grassroots venues in the UK

Policy & Legal
Feb 16, 2026
1 min read
DOJ Antitrust Chief Gail Slater Steps Down
The move sparks fears over the fate of the DOJ case against Live Nation

UMG Acquisition of Downtown Music is Approved by European Commission
The deal, which has been severely decried by the music industry, is now able to go through

Harry Levin
Policy
Feb 16, 2026

PRS For Music Will Not Factor UK Grassroots Levy Into Licensing Calculations
This move will allow more money from the ticket levy to support grassroots venues in the UK

Harry Levin
Policy
Feb 16, 2026

DOJ Antitrust Chief Gail Slater Steps Down
The move sparks fears over the fate of the DOJ case against Live Nation

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 16, 2026

UMG Inks Global Licensing Deal with ClicknClear
Paves the way for the use of licensed tracks in choreographed sports

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 13, 2026

Mozart AI Raises $6M in Oversubscribed Funding Round
Says its user base has topped 100,000

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 12, 2026

ASCAP Paid Out $1.75 Billion in Royalties in 2025
The amount is a record for the PRO

Harry Levin
Policy
Feb 12, 2026




