


Sir Lucian Grainge and Drake
UMG CEO Sir Lucian Grainge Responds to Drake’s Defamation Lawsuit
In a recent motion, Drake requested documents directly from Grainge
Universal Music Group (UMG) CEO and Chairman Lucian Grainge has officially commented on Drake’s defamation lawsuit against the major label, calling Drake’s claims “groundless and indeed ridiculous.” Grainge’s statement comes after Drake’s legal team requested documents directly from the CEO. They argued the materials would show Grainge played a significant role in promoting Kendrick Lamar's diss track “Not Like Us," which is the focal point of the lawsuit.
What they said:
Grange: “Whilst, as part of my role, I certainly have financial oversight of and responsibility for UMG’s global businesses, the proposition that I was involved in, much less responsible for, reviewing and approving the content of Not Like Us, its cover art or music video, or for determining or directing the promotion of those materials, is groundless and indeed ridiculous.”
UMG’s legal team: “Drake’s motion is a transparent attempt to use discovery to harass UMG and force it to waste time and resources out of spite. The premise of Drake’s motion – that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG’s corporate structure – is absurd.”
Background:
The defamation claim extends in part from the lyric in “Not Like Us,” in which Lamar calls Drake a “certified pedophile.”
Drake claims that UMG, which is both his and Lamar’s label, artificially increased streaming counts for the track through various means, including bot scams and offering lower licensing fees for the track.
Universal Music Group (UMG) CEO and Chairman Lucian Grainge has officially commented on Drake’s defamation lawsuit against the major label, calling Drake’s claims “groundless and indeed ridiculous.” Grainge’s statement comes after Drake’s legal team requested documents directly from the CEO. They argued the materials would show Grainge played a significant role in promoting Kendrick Lamar's diss track “Not Like Us," which is the focal point of the lawsuit.
What they said:
Grange: “Whilst, as part of my role, I certainly have financial oversight of and responsibility for UMG’s global businesses, the proposition that I was involved in, much less responsible for, reviewing and approving the content of Not Like Us, its cover art or music video, or for determining or directing the promotion of those materials, is groundless and indeed ridiculous.”
UMG’s legal team: “Drake’s motion is a transparent attempt to use discovery to harass UMG and force it to waste time and resources out of spite. The premise of Drake’s motion – that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG’s corporate structure – is absurd.”
Background:
The defamation claim extends in part from the lyric in “Not Like Us,” in which Lamar calls Drake a “certified pedophile.”
Drake claims that UMG, which is both his and Lamar’s label, artificially increased streaming counts for the track through various means, including bot scams and offering lower licensing fees for the track.
Universal Music Group (UMG) CEO and Chairman Lucian Grainge has officially commented on Drake’s defamation lawsuit against the major label, calling Drake’s claims “groundless and indeed ridiculous.” Grainge’s statement comes after Drake’s legal team requested documents directly from the CEO. They argued the materials would show Grainge played a significant role in promoting Kendrick Lamar's diss track “Not Like Us," which is the focal point of the lawsuit.
What they said:
Grange: “Whilst, as part of my role, I certainly have financial oversight of and responsibility for UMG’s global businesses, the proposition that I was involved in, much less responsible for, reviewing and approving the content of Not Like Us, its cover art or music video, or for determining or directing the promotion of those materials, is groundless and indeed ridiculous.”
UMG’s legal team: “Drake’s motion is a transparent attempt to use discovery to harass UMG and force it to waste time and resources out of spite. The premise of Drake’s motion – that he could not have lost a rap battle unless it was the product of some imagined secret conspiracy going to the top of UMG’s corporate structure – is absurd.”
Background:
The defamation claim extends in part from the lyric in “Not Like Us,” in which Lamar calls Drake a “certified pedophile.”
Drake claims that UMG, which is both his and Lamar’s label, artificially increased streaming counts for the track through various means, including bot scams and offering lower licensing fees for the track.
Lucian Grainge
Drake
Kendrick Lamar
Not Like Us
Universal Music Group (UMG)
Artist vs. Label Legal Battles
High-Profile Artist Litigation
Label Liability For Artist Feuds
Artist-Led Defamation Lawsuits
Streaming Platform Corruption Allegations
Legal Scrutiny Of Major Artists
Music Industry Litigation
Litigation
Record Labels
Major Labels
Legal Disputes
Artist Defamation Lawsuit
Streaming Manipulation Allegation
United States
Canada
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This article was written with information sourced from Music Week.
- We covered it because the case involves major music industry players: Drake, Kendrick Lamar, and UMG.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Aug 15, 2025
1 min read
Lewis Capaldi Ticket Scalping Increases Scrutiny on StubHub
The Scottish singer is the latest artist to be targeted by ticket scalpers

Policy & Legal
Aug 14, 2025
1 min read
Drake Urges UMG to Reveal Kendrick Lamar’s Contract in Defamation Lawsuit
This comes after the court approved Drake’s legal team serving a subpoena to Kojo Menne Asamoah

Policy & Legal
Aug 14, 2025
1 min read
Spotify Facing Bribery Allegations in Turkey
The accusations follow increased regulatory pressure on the service

Lewis Capaldi Ticket Scalping Increases Scrutiny on StubHub
The Scottish singer is the latest artist to be targeted by ticket scalpers

Rod Yates
Policy
Aug 15, 2025

Drake Urges UMG to Reveal Kendrick Lamar’s Contract in Defamation Lawsuit
This comes after the court approved Drake’s legal team serving a subpoena to Kojo Menne Asamoah

Harry Levin
Policy
Aug 14, 2025

Spotify Facing Bribery Allegations in Turkey
The accusations follow increased regulatory pressure on the service

Rod Yates
Policy
Aug 14, 2025

MF DOOM’s Estate Sues Temu for Alleged Merch Fakes
The rapper’s name and likeness is being used without permission

Rod Yates
Policy
Aug 13, 2025

Court Approves Drake’s Motion to Subpoena Kojo Menne Asamoah
This new development is part of Drake’s defamation suit against UMG in relation to the Kendrick Lamar song, “Not Like Us”

Harry Levin
Policy
Aug 11, 2025

Mike Tyson Hit With Copyright Lawsuit Following Jake Paul Fight
The suit was filed by Jay-Z, DMX, Ja Rule producer Tyrone Fyffe

Rod Yates
Policy
Aug 11, 2025