


Drake
Drake Urges UMG to Reveal Kendrick Lamar’s Contract in Defamation Lawsuit
This comes after the court approved Drake’s legal team serving a subpoena to Kojo Menne Asamoah
Drake has made a new request in his defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG) surrounding Kendrick Lamar’s diss track “Not Like Us.” The Toronto-born superstar rapper is now seeking Lamar’s contract with UMG and information related to allegations of domestic violence pertaining to Lamar.
The request:
UMG had already shared Lamar’s contract with Drake’s legal team, but page 22 was heavily redacted.
This new request is another part of Drake’s efforts to show that UMG defamed him by paying off third parties and offering lower licensing rates to promote “Not Like Us,” which accuses Drake of pedophilia.
Drake’s legal team claims UMG engaged in these activities to weaken Drake’s position during contract negotiations.
The judge in the case has already ruled in Drake’s favor regarding serving a subpoena to Kojo Menne Asamoah.
Other documents:
Drake’s legal team also requested revenue and profit information from Interscope, which is Lamar’s label and a subsidiary of UMG.
This was in an effort to demonstrate that the label was defaming Drake to increase profits from Lamar’s catalog.
Drake is additionally seeking documents relating to UMG CEO Lucian Grainge, whom Drake claims encouraged the competition.
Drake is signed to Republic Records, a UMG subsidiary.
Drake has made a new request in his defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG) surrounding Kendrick Lamar’s diss track “Not Like Us.” The Toronto-born superstar rapper is now seeking Lamar’s contract with UMG and information related to allegations of domestic violence pertaining to Lamar.
The request:
UMG had already shared Lamar’s contract with Drake’s legal team, but page 22 was heavily redacted.
This new request is another part of Drake’s efforts to show that UMG defamed him by paying off third parties and offering lower licensing rates to promote “Not Like Us,” which accuses Drake of pedophilia.
Drake’s legal team claims UMG engaged in these activities to weaken Drake’s position during contract negotiations.
The judge in the case has already ruled in Drake’s favor regarding serving a subpoena to Kojo Menne Asamoah.
Other documents:
Drake’s legal team also requested revenue and profit information from Interscope, which is Lamar’s label and a subsidiary of UMG.
This was in an effort to demonstrate that the label was defaming Drake to increase profits from Lamar’s catalog.
Drake is additionally seeking documents relating to UMG CEO Lucian Grainge, whom Drake claims encouraged the competition.
Drake is signed to Republic Records, a UMG subsidiary.
Drake has made a new request in his defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG) surrounding Kendrick Lamar’s diss track “Not Like Us.” The Toronto-born superstar rapper is now seeking Lamar’s contract with UMG and information related to allegations of domestic violence pertaining to Lamar.
The request:
UMG had already shared Lamar’s contract with Drake’s legal team, but page 22 was heavily redacted.
This new request is another part of Drake’s efforts to show that UMG defamed him by paying off third parties and offering lower licensing rates to promote “Not Like Us,” which accuses Drake of pedophilia.
Drake’s legal team claims UMG engaged in these activities to weaken Drake’s position during contract negotiations.
The judge in the case has already ruled in Drake’s favor regarding serving a subpoena to Kojo Menne Asamoah.
Other documents:
Drake’s legal team also requested revenue and profit information from Interscope, which is Lamar’s label and a subsidiary of UMG.
This was in an effort to demonstrate that the label was defaming Drake to increase profits from Lamar’s catalog.
Drake is additionally seeking documents relating to UMG CEO Lucian Grainge, whom Drake claims encouraged the competition.
Drake is signed to Republic Records, a UMG subsidiary.
Drake
Kendrick Lamar
Interscope
Lucian Grainge
Republic Records
Kojo Menne Asamoah
Universal Music Group (UMG)
Artist-Led Defamation Lawsuits
High-Profile Artist Litigation
Artist vs. Label Legal Battles
Label Liability For Artist Feuds
Label Conflict Of Interest
Music Industry Litigation
Litigation
Legal & Litigation
Artist Defamation Lawsuit
Major Labels
Record Labels
Legal Disputes
United States
Canada
Toronto, CA
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This article was written with information sourced from The Hollywood Reporter.
- We covered it because the case involves major music industry players: Drake, Kendrick Lamar, and UMG.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Sep 26, 2025
1 min read
Spotify Denies Changing its Terms for Artists
Dismisses the accusations as “misinformation”

Policy & Legal
Sep 26, 2025
1 min read
CMA Secures Ticketmaster Pledge to Improve Fairness for Fans
The commitment follows an investigation into the Oasis reunion tour ticketing

Policy & Legal
Sep 23, 2025
1 min read
Major Labels Expand Suno Lawsuit to Include Piracy Claims
The move comes in the wake of Anthropic’s $1.5bn settlement

Spotify Denies Changing its Terms for Artists
Dismisses the accusations as “misinformation”

Rod Yates
Policy
Sep 26, 2025

CMA Secures Ticketmaster Pledge to Improve Fairness for Fans
The commitment follows an investigation into the Oasis reunion tour ticketing

Rod Yates
Policy
Sep 26, 2025

Major Labels Expand Suno Lawsuit to Include Piracy Claims
The move comes in the wake of Anthropic’s $1.5bn settlement

Rod Yates
Policy
Sep 23, 2025

FTC Sues Live Nation, Ticketmaster Over Alleged Illegal Ticket Resales
Seven states have also joined the lawsuit

Rod Yates
Policy
Sep 19, 2025

Major Labels Resolve Copyright Dispute With Internet Archive
The issue related to the nonprofit’s digitization and streaming of vintage 78s

Rod Yates
Policy
Sep 17, 2025

FTC Probes Live Nation/Ticketmaster for Alleged BOTS Act Violations
The investigation is at an “advanced stage”

Rod Yates
Policy
Sep 17, 2025