


Bad Bunny
Bad Bunny Sued for $16 Million Over Unauthorized Sample
The complaint is related to two of Puerto Rican superstar’s songs
Bad Bunny has been hit with a $16 million lawsuit for allegedly using an uncleared sample on two songs: “Solo de Mi” (2018) and “EoO” (2025). The piece of audio is a voice recording from Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera, who filed the suit in Puerto Rico.
The details:
Bad Bunny's label, Rimas Entertainment, and producer, Roberto “La Paciencia” Rosado, were also named in the suit.
Rivera claims Rosado requested that she record the sound bite, but never informed her it would be used publicly.
The piece of audio in question is Rivera speaking the phrase “Mira, puñeta, no me quiten el perreo,” which can be translated to “Listen, damn it, don’t take away my dancing.”
Rivera goes on to state that the recording was used on tour and in promotional material.
Rivera’s legal team is the same one that sued Bad Bunny in 2023. That suit was also related to the use of an unauthorized recording.
What they said:
The complaint, translated from Spanish to English, reads: “At the time of the request, the purpose of the audio was not explained, nor was the plaintiff informed that her identity would be used and commercially exploited. No compensation of any kind was discussed. No contract or agreement was signed, nor was any license or authorization granted.”
Bad Bunny has been hit with a $16 million lawsuit for allegedly using an uncleared sample on two songs: “Solo de Mi” (2018) and “EoO” (2025). The piece of audio is a voice recording from Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera, who filed the suit in Puerto Rico.
The details:
Bad Bunny's label, Rimas Entertainment, and producer, Roberto “La Paciencia” Rosado, were also named in the suit.
Rivera claims Rosado requested that she record the sound bite, but never informed her it would be used publicly.
The piece of audio in question is Rivera speaking the phrase “Mira, puñeta, no me quiten el perreo,” which can be translated to “Listen, damn it, don’t take away my dancing.”
Rivera goes on to state that the recording was used on tour and in promotional material.
Rivera’s legal team is the same one that sued Bad Bunny in 2023. That suit was also related to the use of an unauthorized recording.
What they said:
The complaint, translated from Spanish to English, reads: “At the time of the request, the purpose of the audio was not explained, nor was the plaintiff informed that her identity would be used and commercially exploited. No compensation of any kind was discussed. No contract or agreement was signed, nor was any license or authorization granted.”
Bad Bunny has been hit with a $16 million lawsuit for allegedly using an uncleared sample on two songs: “Solo de Mi” (2018) and “EoO” (2025). The piece of audio is a voice recording from Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera, who filed the suit in Puerto Rico.
The details:
Bad Bunny's label, Rimas Entertainment, and producer, Roberto “La Paciencia” Rosado, were also named in the suit.
Rivera claims Rosado requested that she record the sound bite, but never informed her it would be used publicly.
The piece of audio in question is Rivera speaking the phrase “Mira, puñeta, no me quiten el perreo,” which can be translated to “Listen, damn it, don’t take away my dancing.”
Rivera goes on to state that the recording was used on tour and in promotional material.
Rivera’s legal team is the same one that sued Bad Bunny in 2023. That suit was also related to the use of an unauthorized recording.
What they said:
The complaint, translated from Spanish to English, reads: “At the time of the request, the purpose of the audio was not explained, nor was the plaintiff informed that her identity would be used and commercially exploited. No compensation of any kind was discussed. No contract or agreement was signed, nor was any license or authorization granted.”
Bad Bunny
Tainaly Y. Serrano Rivera
Rimas Entertainment
Roberto “La Paciencia” Rosado
Puerto Rico
Artist Lawsuits and Legal Battles
High-Profile Artist Litigation
Legal Scrutiny Of Major Artists
Recurring Copyright Claims
Music Copyright Litigation
Artist Rights And Royalty Disputes
Monetization Of Viral Catchphrases
Litigation Over Informal Voice Recordings
Litigation
Copyright Infringement
Legal Disputes
Unauthorized Likeness Use
Breach of Contract
Uncleared Sample
Voice Sample Dispute
United States
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
This article was written with information sourced from Digital Music News.
We covered it because Bad Bunny is a major pop star.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Jan 19, 2026
1 min read
AXS Sues SecureMyPass Over Alleged Fake Tickets
Claims ticketgoers have been refused entry to major events

Policy & Legal
Jan 19, 2026
1 min read
Drew Barrymore Hit with Copyright Suit Over Use of Song in Instagram Post
Relates to a 2023 post promoting her beauty brand

Policy & Legal
Jan 16, 2026
1 min read
Australian Radio Royalty Rates Set to Jump by 38%
The new rate is back dated to July 2023

AXS Sues SecureMyPass Over Alleged Fake Tickets
Claims ticketgoers have been refused entry to major events

Rod Yates
Policy
Jan 19, 2026

Drew Barrymore Hit with Copyright Suit Over Use of Song in Instagram Post
Relates to a 2023 post promoting her beauty brand

Rod Yates
Policy
Jan 19, 2026

Australian Radio Royalty Rates Set to Jump by 38%
The new rate is back dated to July 2023

Rod Yates
Policy
Jan 16, 2026

Bandcamp Lays Out Ban on AI-Generated Music
Bandcamp is the first major music store to present such restrictions

Harry Levin
Policy
Jan 14, 2026

US Judge Upholds Landmark Ruling That Songwriters Can Reclaim Their Copyrights Worldwide
The precedent was set by songwriter Cyril Vetter taking back global ownership of the 1963 song “Double Shot (Of My Baby’s Love)” from publisher Resnik Music Group

Harry Levin
Policy
Jan 14, 2026

Lizzo Reaches Settlement in Copyright Case Tied to Unreleased Song
The track referenced Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle ad campaign

Rod Yates
Policy
Jan 13, 2026




