


Salt-N-Pepa
UMG Challenges Salt-N-Pepa’s Masters Lawsuit with Motion to Dismiss
The label claims the duo can’t legally exercise “termination rights”
Universal Music Group (UMG) has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit Salt-N-Pepa brought against the label in May, in which it accused UMG of refusing to return control of their master recordings.
Some context:
In May Salt-N-Pepa (AKA Cheryl “Salt” James and Sandra “Pepa” Denton) sued UMG for refusing to grant them termination rights to reacquire their master recordings.
In doing so they allege UMG violated the Copyright Act, which gives artists the right to reclaim control of their music’s intellectual property 35 years after its original release.
In response, UMG claimed the duo’s termination notice was invalid, as per Music Ally.
An update:
UMG has now motioned to dismiss the lawsuit.
They claim Salt-N-Pepa don’t have termination rights because it was their producer, Hurby “Luv Bug” Azor, who signed their 1986 distribution deal with Next Plateau Records, not James and Denton.
Next Plateau Records is now under the UMG umbrella.
As per Billboard the motion reads: “There was never an intention to effectuate a copyright transfer from plaintiffs. The only transfer is made by producer as the copyright owner to Next Plateau. Because this is not a grant subject to termination by plaintiffs, plaintiff’s declaratory judgment claim as to the validity of their termination of purported grants concerning the sound recordings should be dismissed.”
In other words, because Salt-N-Pepa did not sign their original deal with Next Plateau Records, UMG argue the judge should throw out the entire suit.
Salt-N-Pepa’s response:
As per Billboard, a spokesperson said: “UMG’s response is just what we expected – an effort to avoid addressing the core issues facing Salt-N-Pepa and so many other artists in these circumstances. But we remain confident that the facts and the law are on our side.”
Universal Music Group (UMG) has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit Salt-N-Pepa brought against the label in May, in which it accused UMG of refusing to return control of their master recordings.
Some context:
In May Salt-N-Pepa (AKA Cheryl “Salt” James and Sandra “Pepa” Denton) sued UMG for refusing to grant them termination rights to reacquire their master recordings.
In doing so they allege UMG violated the Copyright Act, which gives artists the right to reclaim control of their music’s intellectual property 35 years after its original release.
In response, UMG claimed the duo’s termination notice was invalid, as per Music Ally.
An update:
UMG has now motioned to dismiss the lawsuit.
They claim Salt-N-Pepa don’t have termination rights because it was their producer, Hurby “Luv Bug” Azor, who signed their 1986 distribution deal with Next Plateau Records, not James and Denton.
Next Plateau Records is now under the UMG umbrella.
As per Billboard the motion reads: “There was never an intention to effectuate a copyright transfer from plaintiffs. The only transfer is made by producer as the copyright owner to Next Plateau. Because this is not a grant subject to termination by plaintiffs, plaintiff’s declaratory judgment claim as to the validity of their termination of purported grants concerning the sound recordings should be dismissed.”
In other words, because Salt-N-Pepa did not sign their original deal with Next Plateau Records, UMG argue the judge should throw out the entire suit.
Salt-N-Pepa’s response:
As per Billboard, a spokesperson said: “UMG’s response is just what we expected – an effort to avoid addressing the core issues facing Salt-N-Pepa and so many other artists in these circumstances. But we remain confident that the facts and the law are on our side.”
Universal Music Group (UMG) has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit Salt-N-Pepa brought against the label in May, in which it accused UMG of refusing to return control of their master recordings.
Some context:
In May Salt-N-Pepa (AKA Cheryl “Salt” James and Sandra “Pepa” Denton) sued UMG for refusing to grant them termination rights to reacquire their master recordings.
In doing so they allege UMG violated the Copyright Act, which gives artists the right to reclaim control of their music’s intellectual property 35 years after its original release.
In response, UMG claimed the duo’s termination notice was invalid, as per Music Ally.
An update:
UMG has now motioned to dismiss the lawsuit.
They claim Salt-N-Pepa don’t have termination rights because it was their producer, Hurby “Luv Bug” Azor, who signed their 1986 distribution deal with Next Plateau Records, not James and Denton.
Next Plateau Records is now under the UMG umbrella.
As per Billboard the motion reads: “There was never an intention to effectuate a copyright transfer from plaintiffs. The only transfer is made by producer as the copyright owner to Next Plateau. Because this is not a grant subject to termination by plaintiffs, plaintiff’s declaratory judgment claim as to the validity of their termination of purported grants concerning the sound recordings should be dismissed.”
In other words, because Salt-N-Pepa did not sign their original deal with Next Plateau Records, UMG argue the judge should throw out the entire suit.
Salt-N-Pepa’s response:
As per Billboard, a spokesperson said: “UMG’s response is just what we expected – an effort to avoid addressing the core issues facing Salt-N-Pepa and so many other artists in these circumstances. But we remain confident that the facts and the law are on our side.”
Salt-N-Pepa
Cheryl James
Sandra Denton
Hurby Azor
Next Plateau Records
Universal Music Group (UMG)
Artist Master Rights Reclamation
Artist vs. Label Legal Battles
High-Profile Artist Litigation
Major Label Lawsuits
Artist-Label Legal Conflicts
Music Copyright Litigation
Master Rights
Litigation
Record Labels
Royalty Disputes
Major Labels
Legal Disputes
Copyright Infringement
Copyright Termination Rights
United States
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This story was written with information sourced from Billboard and Music Ally.
- We covered it because it’s an update on the ongoing legal fight between UMG and Salt-N-Pepa.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Jul 21, 2025
1 min read
Brazilian Court Takes Aim at Streaming Fraudsters
Operation Authentica’s fight against streaming fraud gains momentum

Policy & Legal
Jul 17, 2025
1 min read
Jane’s Addiction Sue Frontman Perry Farrell For $10 Million
The trouble stems from the 2024 onstage brawl that ended their tour and LP plans

Policy & Legal
Jul 16, 2025
1 min read
Report: Oak View Group Received Kickbacks From Live Nation/Ticketmaster
The revelation follows Tim Leiweke’s bid-rigging indictment

Brazilian Court Takes Aim at Streaming Fraudsters
Operation Authentica’s fight against streaming fraud gains momentum

Rod Yates
Policy
Jul 21, 2025

Jane’s Addiction Sue Frontman Perry Farrell For $10 Million
The trouble stems from the 2024 onstage brawl that ended their tour and LP plans

Rod Yates
Policy
Jul 17, 2025

Report: Oak View Group Received Kickbacks From Live Nation/Ticketmaster
The revelation follows Tim Leiweke’s bid-rigging indictment

Rod Yates
Policy
Jul 16, 2025

European Commission to Open Investigation Into UMG’s Downtown Deal
This is the latest development surrounding the major label’s acquisition of the leading music services company

Harry Levin
Policy
Jul 16, 2025

Drake Prepares for Legal Showdown With UMG, Cites 63 Potential Witnesses
The list includes Sir Lucian Grainge, Monte Lipman and more

Rod Yates
Policy
Jul 15, 2025

Juice Entertainment Responds to DOJ and FTC Inquiry with Official Letter
The promoter has been locked in a lengthy lawsuit with Live Nation

Rod Yates
Policy
Jul 14, 2025