


Salt-N-Pepa
UMG Challenges Salt-N-Pepa’s Masters Lawsuit with Motion to Dismiss
The label claims the duo can’t legally exercise “termination rights”
Universal Music Group (UMG) has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit Salt-N-Pepa brought against the label in May, in which it accused UMG of refusing to return control of their master recordings.
Some context:
In May Salt-N-Pepa (AKA Cheryl “Salt” James and Sandra “Pepa” Denton) sued UMG for refusing to grant them termination rights to reacquire their master recordings.
In doing so they allege UMG violated the Copyright Act, which gives artists the right to reclaim control of their music’s intellectual property 35 years after its original release.
In response, UMG claimed the duo’s termination notice was invalid, as per Music Ally.
An update:
UMG has now motioned to dismiss the lawsuit.
They claim Salt-N-Pepa don’t have termination rights because it was their producer, Hurby “Luv Bug” Azor, who signed their 1986 distribution deal with Next Plateau Records, not James and Denton.
Next Plateau Records is now under the UMG umbrella.
As per Billboard the motion reads: “There was never an intention to effectuate a copyright transfer from plaintiffs. The only transfer is made by producer as the copyright owner to Next Plateau. Because this is not a grant subject to termination by plaintiffs, plaintiff’s declaratory judgment claim as to the validity of their termination of purported grants concerning the sound recordings should be dismissed.”
In other words, because Salt-N-Pepa did not sign their original deal with Next Plateau Records, UMG argue the judge should throw out the entire suit.
Salt-N-Pepa’s response:
As per Billboard, a spokesperson said: “UMG’s response is just what we expected – an effort to avoid addressing the core issues facing Salt-N-Pepa and so many other artists in these circumstances. But we remain confident that the facts and the law are on our side.”
Universal Music Group (UMG) has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit Salt-N-Pepa brought against the label in May, in which it accused UMG of refusing to return control of their master recordings.
Some context:
In May Salt-N-Pepa (AKA Cheryl “Salt” James and Sandra “Pepa” Denton) sued UMG for refusing to grant them termination rights to reacquire their master recordings.
In doing so they allege UMG violated the Copyright Act, which gives artists the right to reclaim control of their music’s intellectual property 35 years after its original release.
In response, UMG claimed the duo’s termination notice was invalid, as per Music Ally.
An update:
UMG has now motioned to dismiss the lawsuit.
They claim Salt-N-Pepa don’t have termination rights because it was their producer, Hurby “Luv Bug” Azor, who signed their 1986 distribution deal with Next Plateau Records, not James and Denton.
Next Plateau Records is now under the UMG umbrella.
As per Billboard the motion reads: “There was never an intention to effectuate a copyright transfer from plaintiffs. The only transfer is made by producer as the copyright owner to Next Plateau. Because this is not a grant subject to termination by plaintiffs, plaintiff’s declaratory judgment claim as to the validity of their termination of purported grants concerning the sound recordings should be dismissed.”
In other words, because Salt-N-Pepa did not sign their original deal with Next Plateau Records, UMG argue the judge should throw out the entire suit.
Salt-N-Pepa’s response:
As per Billboard, a spokesperson said: “UMG’s response is just what we expected – an effort to avoid addressing the core issues facing Salt-N-Pepa and so many other artists in these circumstances. But we remain confident that the facts and the law are on our side.”
Universal Music Group (UMG) has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit Salt-N-Pepa brought against the label in May, in which it accused UMG of refusing to return control of their master recordings.
Some context:
In May Salt-N-Pepa (AKA Cheryl “Salt” James and Sandra “Pepa” Denton) sued UMG for refusing to grant them termination rights to reacquire their master recordings.
In doing so they allege UMG violated the Copyright Act, which gives artists the right to reclaim control of their music’s intellectual property 35 years after its original release.
In response, UMG claimed the duo’s termination notice was invalid, as per Music Ally.
An update:
UMG has now motioned to dismiss the lawsuit.
They claim Salt-N-Pepa don’t have termination rights because it was their producer, Hurby “Luv Bug” Azor, who signed their 1986 distribution deal with Next Plateau Records, not James and Denton.
Next Plateau Records is now under the UMG umbrella.
As per Billboard the motion reads: “There was never an intention to effectuate a copyright transfer from plaintiffs. The only transfer is made by producer as the copyright owner to Next Plateau. Because this is not a grant subject to termination by plaintiffs, plaintiff’s declaratory judgment claim as to the validity of their termination of purported grants concerning the sound recordings should be dismissed.”
In other words, because Salt-N-Pepa did not sign their original deal with Next Plateau Records, UMG argue the judge should throw out the entire suit.
Salt-N-Pepa’s response:
As per Billboard, a spokesperson said: “UMG’s response is just what we expected – an effort to avoid addressing the core issues facing Salt-N-Pepa and so many other artists in these circumstances. But we remain confident that the facts and the law are on our side.”
Salt-N-Pepa
Cheryl James
Sandra Denton
Hurby Azor
Next Plateau Records
Universal Music Group (UMG)
Artist Master Rights Reclamation
Artist vs. Label Legal Battles
High-Profile Artist Litigation
Major Label Lawsuits
Artist-Label Legal Conflicts
Music Copyright Litigation
Master Rights
Litigation
Record Labels
Royalty Disputes
Major Labels
Legal Disputes
Copyright Infringement
Copyright Termination Rights
United States
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This story was written with information sourced from Billboard and Music Ally.
- We covered it because it’s an update on the ongoing legal fight between UMG and Salt-N-Pepa.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Jan 16, 2026
1 min read
Australian Radio Royalty Rates Set to Jump by 38%
The new rate is back dated to July 2023

Policy & Legal
Jan 14, 2026
1 min read
Bandcamp Lays Out Ban on AI-Generated Music
Bandcamp is the first major music store to present such restrictions

Policy & Legal
Jan 14, 2026
1 min read
US Judge Upholds Landmark Ruling That Songwriters Can Reclaim Their Copyrights Worldwide
The precedent was set by songwriter Cyril Vetter taking back global ownership of the 1963 song “Double Shot (Of My Baby’s Love)” from publisher Resnik Music Group

Australian Radio Royalty Rates Set to Jump by 38%
The new rate is back dated to July 2023

Rod Yates
Policy
Jan 16, 2026

Bandcamp Lays Out Ban on AI-Generated Music
Bandcamp is the first major music store to present such restrictions

Harry Levin
Policy
Jan 14, 2026

US Judge Upholds Landmark Ruling That Songwriters Can Reclaim Their Copyrights Worldwide
The precedent was set by songwriter Cyril Vetter taking back global ownership of the 1963 song “Double Shot (Of My Baby’s Love)” from publisher Resnik Music Group

Harry Levin
Policy
Jan 14, 2026

Lizzo Reaches Settlement in Copyright Case Tied to Unreleased Song
The track referenced Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle ad campaign

Rod Yates
Policy
Jan 13, 2026

Over 130 Music Professionals Demand EU Action on Unauthorized Ticket Resales
Signatories to the open letter include reps for A-list artists such as Radiohead, Oasis, and Ed Sheeran

Harry Levin
Policy
Jan 12, 2026

Elon Musk’s X Sues NMPA, 18 Publishers as Licensing Dispute Widens
The platform alleges collusion and anti-competitive behavior

Rod Yates
Policy
Jan 12, 2026




