


Salt-N-Pepa
UMG Challenges Salt-N-Pepa’s Masters Lawsuit with Motion to Dismiss
The label claims the duo can’t legally exercise “termination rights”
Universal Music Group (UMG) has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit Salt-N-Pepa brought against the label in May, in which it accused UMG of refusing to return control of their master recordings.
Some context:
In May Salt-N-Pepa (AKA Cheryl “Salt” James and Sandra “Pepa” Denton) sued UMG for refusing to grant them termination rights to reacquire their master recordings.
In doing so they allege UMG violated the Copyright Act, which gives artists the right to reclaim control of their music’s intellectual property 35 years after its original release.
In response, UMG claimed the duo’s termination notice was invalid, as per Music Ally.
An update:
UMG has now motioned to dismiss the lawsuit.
They claim Salt-N-Pepa don’t have termination rights because it was their producer, Hurby “Luv Bug” Azor, who signed their 1986 distribution deal with Next Plateau Records, not James and Denton.
Next Plateau Records is now under the UMG umbrella.
As per Billboard the motion reads: “There was never an intention to effectuate a copyright transfer from plaintiffs. The only transfer is made by producer as the copyright owner to Next Plateau. Because this is not a grant subject to termination by plaintiffs, plaintiff’s declaratory judgment claim as to the validity of their termination of purported grants concerning the sound recordings should be dismissed.”
In other words, because Salt-N-Pepa did not sign their original deal with Next Plateau Records, UMG argue the judge should throw out the entire suit.
Salt-N-Pepa’s response:
As per Billboard, a spokesperson said: “UMG’s response is just what we expected – an effort to avoid addressing the core issues facing Salt-N-Pepa and so many other artists in these circumstances. But we remain confident that the facts and the law are on our side.”
Universal Music Group (UMG) has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit Salt-N-Pepa brought against the label in May, in which it accused UMG of refusing to return control of their master recordings.
Some context:
In May Salt-N-Pepa (AKA Cheryl “Salt” James and Sandra “Pepa” Denton) sued UMG for refusing to grant them termination rights to reacquire their master recordings.
In doing so they allege UMG violated the Copyright Act, which gives artists the right to reclaim control of their music’s intellectual property 35 years after its original release.
In response, UMG claimed the duo’s termination notice was invalid, as per Music Ally.
An update:
UMG has now motioned to dismiss the lawsuit.
They claim Salt-N-Pepa don’t have termination rights because it was their producer, Hurby “Luv Bug” Azor, who signed their 1986 distribution deal with Next Plateau Records, not James and Denton.
Next Plateau Records is now under the UMG umbrella.
As per Billboard the motion reads: “There was never an intention to effectuate a copyright transfer from plaintiffs. The only transfer is made by producer as the copyright owner to Next Plateau. Because this is not a grant subject to termination by plaintiffs, plaintiff’s declaratory judgment claim as to the validity of their termination of purported grants concerning the sound recordings should be dismissed.”
In other words, because Salt-N-Pepa did not sign their original deal with Next Plateau Records, UMG argue the judge should throw out the entire suit.
Salt-N-Pepa’s response:
As per Billboard, a spokesperson said: “UMG’s response is just what we expected – an effort to avoid addressing the core issues facing Salt-N-Pepa and so many other artists in these circumstances. But we remain confident that the facts and the law are on our side.”
Universal Music Group (UMG) has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit Salt-N-Pepa brought against the label in May, in which it accused UMG of refusing to return control of their master recordings.
Some context:
In May Salt-N-Pepa (AKA Cheryl “Salt” James and Sandra “Pepa” Denton) sued UMG for refusing to grant them termination rights to reacquire their master recordings.
In doing so they allege UMG violated the Copyright Act, which gives artists the right to reclaim control of their music’s intellectual property 35 years after its original release.
In response, UMG claimed the duo’s termination notice was invalid, as per Music Ally.
An update:
UMG has now motioned to dismiss the lawsuit.
They claim Salt-N-Pepa don’t have termination rights because it was their producer, Hurby “Luv Bug” Azor, who signed their 1986 distribution deal with Next Plateau Records, not James and Denton.
Next Plateau Records is now under the UMG umbrella.
As per Billboard the motion reads: “There was never an intention to effectuate a copyright transfer from plaintiffs. The only transfer is made by producer as the copyright owner to Next Plateau. Because this is not a grant subject to termination by plaintiffs, plaintiff’s declaratory judgment claim as to the validity of their termination of purported grants concerning the sound recordings should be dismissed.”
In other words, because Salt-N-Pepa did not sign their original deal with Next Plateau Records, UMG argue the judge should throw out the entire suit.
Salt-N-Pepa’s response:
As per Billboard, a spokesperson said: “UMG’s response is just what we expected – an effort to avoid addressing the core issues facing Salt-N-Pepa and so many other artists in these circumstances. But we remain confident that the facts and the law are on our side.”
Salt-N-Pepa
Cheryl James
Sandra Denton
Hurby Azor
Next Plateau Records
Universal Music Group (UMG)
Artist Master Rights Reclamation
Artist vs. Label Legal Battles
High-Profile Artist Litigation
Major Label Lawsuits
Artist-Label Legal Conflicts
Music Copyright Litigation
Master Rights
Litigation
Record Labels
Royalty Disputes
Major Labels
Legal Disputes
Copyright Infringement
Copyright Termination Rights
United States
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This story was written with information sourced from Billboard and Music Ally.
- We covered it because it’s an update on the ongoing legal fight between UMG and Salt-N-Pepa.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Dec 2, 2025
1 min read
Daddy Yankee Files Lawsuit Against Raphy Pina Over Allegedly Diverted Royalties
The suit claims that the Puerto Rican artist is owed millions from his former manager

Policy & Legal
Dec 1, 2025
1 min read
Music Fans in Quebec Reject Plan For French-Language Streaming Quotas
Bill 109 seeks to “affirm the cultural sovereignty” of the French-Canadian province

Policy & Legal
Dec 1, 2025
1 min read
Former Cradle of Filth Members Launch Legal Action Against Vocalist Dani Filth
The move follows the departures of keyboardist Zoe Marie Federoff and guitarist Marek ‘Ashok’ Šmerda

Daddy Yankee Files Lawsuit Against Raphy Pina Over Allegedly Diverted Royalties
The suit claims that the Puerto Rican artist is owed millions from his former manager

Harry Levin
Policy
Dec 2, 2025

Music Fans in Quebec Reject Plan For French-Language Streaming Quotas
Bill 109 seeks to “affirm the cultural sovereignty” of the French-Canadian province

Rod Yates
Policy
Dec 1, 2025

Former Cradle of Filth Members Launch Legal Action Against Vocalist Dani Filth
The move follows the departures of keyboardist Zoe Marie Federoff and guitarist Marek ‘Ashok’ Šmerda

Rod Yates
Policy
Dec 1, 2025

ECSA Voices Concerns Over Major Label AI Deals
The European Composer and Songwriter Alliance is calling for more transparency

Rod Yates
Policy
Dec 1, 2025

Johnny Cash Estate Sues Coca-Cola
The claim relates to the beverage giant’s use of a sound-alike singer in a TV ad

Rod Yates
Policy
Nov 28, 2025

Taylor Swift Fans’ Lawsuit Against Live Nation to Proceed
The suit relates to the ‘Eras’ tour onsale

Rod Yates
Policy
Nov 28, 2025




