


Salt-N-Pepa
UMG Challenges Salt-N-Pepa’s Masters Lawsuit with Motion to Dismiss
The label claims the duo can’t legally exercise “termination rights”
Universal Music Group (UMG) has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit Salt-N-Pepa brought against the label in May, in which it accused UMG of refusing to return control of their master recordings.
Some context:
In May Salt-N-Pepa (AKA Cheryl “Salt” James and Sandra “Pepa” Denton) sued UMG for refusing to grant them termination rights to reacquire their master recordings.
In doing so they allege UMG violated the Copyright Act, which gives artists the right to reclaim control of their music’s intellectual property 35 years after its original release.
In response, UMG claimed the duo’s termination notice was invalid, as per Music Ally.
An update:
UMG has now motioned to dismiss the lawsuit.
They claim Salt-N-Pepa don’t have termination rights because it was their producer, Hurby “Luv Bug” Azor, who signed their 1986 distribution deal with Next Plateau Records, not James and Denton.
Next Plateau Records is now under the UMG umbrella.
As per Billboard the motion reads: “There was never an intention to effectuate a copyright transfer from plaintiffs. The only transfer is made by producer as the copyright owner to Next Plateau. Because this is not a grant subject to termination by plaintiffs, plaintiff’s declaratory judgment claim as to the validity of their termination of purported grants concerning the sound recordings should be dismissed.”
In other words, because Salt-N-Pepa did not sign their original deal with Next Plateau Records, UMG argue the judge should throw out the entire suit.
Salt-N-Pepa’s response:
As per Billboard, a spokesperson said: “UMG’s response is just what we expected – an effort to avoid addressing the core issues facing Salt-N-Pepa and so many other artists in these circumstances. But we remain confident that the facts and the law are on our side.”
Universal Music Group (UMG) has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit Salt-N-Pepa brought against the label in May, in which it accused UMG of refusing to return control of their master recordings.
Some context:
In May Salt-N-Pepa (AKA Cheryl “Salt” James and Sandra “Pepa” Denton) sued UMG for refusing to grant them termination rights to reacquire their master recordings.
In doing so they allege UMG violated the Copyright Act, which gives artists the right to reclaim control of their music’s intellectual property 35 years after its original release.
In response, UMG claimed the duo’s termination notice was invalid, as per Music Ally.
An update:
UMG has now motioned to dismiss the lawsuit.
They claim Salt-N-Pepa don’t have termination rights because it was their producer, Hurby “Luv Bug” Azor, who signed their 1986 distribution deal with Next Plateau Records, not James and Denton.
Next Plateau Records is now under the UMG umbrella.
As per Billboard the motion reads: “There was never an intention to effectuate a copyright transfer from plaintiffs. The only transfer is made by producer as the copyright owner to Next Plateau. Because this is not a grant subject to termination by plaintiffs, plaintiff’s declaratory judgment claim as to the validity of their termination of purported grants concerning the sound recordings should be dismissed.”
In other words, because Salt-N-Pepa did not sign their original deal with Next Plateau Records, UMG argue the judge should throw out the entire suit.
Salt-N-Pepa’s response:
As per Billboard, a spokesperson said: “UMG’s response is just what we expected – an effort to avoid addressing the core issues facing Salt-N-Pepa and so many other artists in these circumstances. But we remain confident that the facts and the law are on our side.”
Universal Music Group (UMG) has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit Salt-N-Pepa brought against the label in May, in which it accused UMG of refusing to return control of their master recordings.
Some context:
In May Salt-N-Pepa (AKA Cheryl “Salt” James and Sandra “Pepa” Denton) sued UMG for refusing to grant them termination rights to reacquire their master recordings.
In doing so they allege UMG violated the Copyright Act, which gives artists the right to reclaim control of their music’s intellectual property 35 years after its original release.
In response, UMG claimed the duo’s termination notice was invalid, as per Music Ally.
An update:
UMG has now motioned to dismiss the lawsuit.
They claim Salt-N-Pepa don’t have termination rights because it was their producer, Hurby “Luv Bug” Azor, who signed their 1986 distribution deal with Next Plateau Records, not James and Denton.
Next Plateau Records is now under the UMG umbrella.
As per Billboard the motion reads: “There was never an intention to effectuate a copyright transfer from plaintiffs. The only transfer is made by producer as the copyright owner to Next Plateau. Because this is not a grant subject to termination by plaintiffs, plaintiff’s declaratory judgment claim as to the validity of their termination of purported grants concerning the sound recordings should be dismissed.”
In other words, because Salt-N-Pepa did not sign their original deal with Next Plateau Records, UMG argue the judge should throw out the entire suit.
Salt-N-Pepa’s response:
As per Billboard, a spokesperson said: “UMG’s response is just what we expected – an effort to avoid addressing the core issues facing Salt-N-Pepa and so many other artists in these circumstances. But we remain confident that the facts and the law are on our side.”
Salt-N-Pepa
Cheryl James
Sandra Denton
Hurby Azor
Next Plateau Records
Universal Music Group (UMG)
Artist Master Rights Reclamation
Artist vs. Label Legal Battles
High-Profile Artist Litigation
Major Label Lawsuits
Artist-Label Legal Conflicts
Music Copyright Litigation
Master Rights
Litigation
Record Labels
Royalty Disputes
Major Labels
Legal Disputes
Copyright Infringement
Copyright Termination Rights
United States
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This story was written with information sourced from Billboard and Music Ally.
- We covered it because it’s an update on the ongoing legal fight between UMG and Salt-N-Pepa.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Sep 4, 2025
1 min read
More Details Emerge in the Sting vs Copeland/Summers Lawsuit
His former bandmates in The Police claim they’re owed £1.5m

Policy & Legal
Sep 4, 2025
1 min read
EU Pauses Probe Into UMG’s Acquisition of Downtown Music Holdings
The deal has been under scrutiny for months in regards to anti-trust concerns

Policy & Legal
Sep 2, 2025
1 min read
Vinyl Records and CDs Will be Exempt From US Tariffs
US Customs and Border Protection confirmed the exemption

More Details Emerge in the Sting vs Copeland/Summers Lawsuit
His former bandmates in The Police claim they’re owed £1.5m

Rod Yates
Policy
Sep 4, 2025

EU Pauses Probe Into UMG’s Acquisition of Downtown Music Holdings
The deal has been under scrutiny for months in regards to anti-trust concerns

Harry Levin
Policy
Sep 4, 2025

Vinyl Records and CDs Will be Exempt From US Tariffs
US Customs and Border Protection confirmed the exemption

Harry Levin
Policy
Sep 2, 2025

Authorities Investigate Burning Man Homicide
Festival organizers are cooperating with the investigation

Rod Yates
Policy
Sep 2, 2025

Cox Warns of Mass Internet Disconnections in Latest Fight with Majors
The battle is ramping up again in the US Supreme Court

Rod Yates
Policy
Sep 2, 2025

PRS For Music Prevails in Lawsuit Related to Royalty Distributions
Plaintiffs claimed the UK-based performance rights organization misallocates ‘black box’ income

Harry Levin
Policy
Sep 1, 2025