


Spotify’s Bundling Subscriptions Again Under the Spotlight
US Senators urge the FTC to investigate
Spotify’s March 2024 decision to reclassify its Premium subscription tiers as bundles, offering 15 hours of audiobook access each month, has drawn the ire of Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn and Democrat Senator Ben Ray Luján, who have urged Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairman Andrew Ferguson to investigate.
The background:
As we reported here, the 2022 Phonorecords IV legal settlement set the on-demand streaming mechanical rates in the US between 2023 and 2027.
It stipulates that mechanical royalties are calculated at a significantly lower rate for bundled subscriptions versus unbundled standalone music subscriptions.
Digital Music News states over 44 million Spotify subscribers were automatically converted into bundled subscriptions, resulting in a significant decline in royalty payments.
The Senators’ concerns:
The Senators released a letter on June 20 imploring the FTC to investigate Spotify converting Premium subscriptions into higher-priced bundled subscriptions without consumers’ knowledge or consent.
The letter states, “These actions harm consumers and could deeply damage the marketplace and the music royalty system,” and urges the FTC to “investigate the impact of Spotify’s recent actions, to take steps to protect Americans from being forced into subscriptions without notice or choice, and to safeguard the music marketplace.”
It continues: “Spotify’s intent seems clear – to slash the statutory royalties it pays to songwriters and music publishers. Not only has this harmed our creative community, but this action has also harmed consumers.”
The 'Basic Plan':
The Senators’ letter acknowledges that following the negative fallout to the bundling, Spotify “quietly re-launched a music-only paid service, now called a ‘Basic Plan,’ which is available to existing subscribers only.”
But, it says, “Spotify has hidden the Basic Plan so that existing subscribers must jump through endless hoops to find the option.”
What they said:
In a statement to Variety, National Music Publishers’ Association (NMPA) President/CEO David Israelite said: “As we have said since they started their bundling scheme last year – Spotify’s forced conversion of subscribers doesn’t only hurt songwriters – it hurts consumers. We are extremely pleased that United States senators Blackburn and Lujan are also asking the FTC to investigate this as it will have ripple effects across other platforms. These unfair business practices hurt music creators and users and it must stop.”
Spotify’s March 2024 decision to reclassify its Premium subscription tiers as bundles, offering 15 hours of audiobook access each month, has drawn the ire of Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn and Democrat Senator Ben Ray Luján, who have urged Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairman Andrew Ferguson to investigate.
The background:
As we reported here, the 2022 Phonorecords IV legal settlement set the on-demand streaming mechanical rates in the US between 2023 and 2027.
It stipulates that mechanical royalties are calculated at a significantly lower rate for bundled subscriptions versus unbundled standalone music subscriptions.
Digital Music News states over 44 million Spotify subscribers were automatically converted into bundled subscriptions, resulting in a significant decline in royalty payments.
The Senators’ concerns:
The Senators released a letter on June 20 imploring the FTC to investigate Spotify converting Premium subscriptions into higher-priced bundled subscriptions without consumers’ knowledge or consent.
The letter states, “These actions harm consumers and could deeply damage the marketplace and the music royalty system,” and urges the FTC to “investigate the impact of Spotify’s recent actions, to take steps to protect Americans from being forced into subscriptions without notice or choice, and to safeguard the music marketplace.”
It continues: “Spotify’s intent seems clear – to slash the statutory royalties it pays to songwriters and music publishers. Not only has this harmed our creative community, but this action has also harmed consumers.”
The 'Basic Plan':
The Senators’ letter acknowledges that following the negative fallout to the bundling, Spotify “quietly re-launched a music-only paid service, now called a ‘Basic Plan,’ which is available to existing subscribers only.”
But, it says, “Spotify has hidden the Basic Plan so that existing subscribers must jump through endless hoops to find the option.”
What they said:
In a statement to Variety, National Music Publishers’ Association (NMPA) President/CEO David Israelite said: “As we have said since they started their bundling scheme last year – Spotify’s forced conversion of subscribers doesn’t only hurt songwriters – it hurts consumers. We are extremely pleased that United States senators Blackburn and Lujan are also asking the FTC to investigate this as it will have ripple effects across other platforms. These unfair business practices hurt music creators and users and it must stop.”
Spotify’s March 2024 decision to reclassify its Premium subscription tiers as bundles, offering 15 hours of audiobook access each month, has drawn the ire of Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn and Democrat Senator Ben Ray Luján, who have urged Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairman Andrew Ferguson to investigate.
The background:
As we reported here, the 2022 Phonorecords IV legal settlement set the on-demand streaming mechanical rates in the US between 2023 and 2027.
It stipulates that mechanical royalties are calculated at a significantly lower rate for bundled subscriptions versus unbundled standalone music subscriptions.
Digital Music News states over 44 million Spotify subscribers were automatically converted into bundled subscriptions, resulting in a significant decline in royalty payments.
The Senators’ concerns:
The Senators released a letter on June 20 imploring the FTC to investigate Spotify converting Premium subscriptions into higher-priced bundled subscriptions without consumers’ knowledge or consent.
The letter states, “These actions harm consumers and could deeply damage the marketplace and the music royalty system,” and urges the FTC to “investigate the impact of Spotify’s recent actions, to take steps to protect Americans from being forced into subscriptions without notice or choice, and to safeguard the music marketplace.”
It continues: “Spotify’s intent seems clear – to slash the statutory royalties it pays to songwriters and music publishers. Not only has this harmed our creative community, but this action has also harmed consumers.”
The 'Basic Plan':
The Senators’ letter acknowledges that following the negative fallout to the bundling, Spotify “quietly re-launched a music-only paid service, now called a ‘Basic Plan,’ which is available to existing subscribers only.”
But, it says, “Spotify has hidden the Basic Plan so that existing subscribers must jump through endless hoops to find the option.”
What they said:
In a statement to Variety, National Music Publishers’ Association (NMPA) President/CEO David Israelite said: “As we have said since they started their bundling scheme last year – Spotify’s forced conversion of subscribers doesn’t only hurt songwriters – it hurts consumers. We are extremely pleased that United States senators Blackburn and Lujan are also asking the FTC to investigate this as it will have ripple effects across other platforms. These unfair business practices hurt music creators and users and it must stop.”
Spotify
Marsha Blackburn
Ben Ray Luján
Federal Trade Commission
Andrew Ferguson
David Israelite
Phonorecords IV
Artist Rights And Royalty Disputes
Industry Litigation
Legal Battles Over Royalties
Platform Bundling Regulation
Publisher and Platform Licensing Disputes
Streaming Royalty Disputes
Consumer Protection Law
Litigation
Policy & Legal
Premium Tiers
Royalty Disputes
Streaming Royalties
Subscription Bundling
United States
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This story was written with information sourced from Senator Blackburn’s and Senator Luján’s letter to the FTC, with additional reporting by Variety and Music Business Worldwide.
- We covered it because of Spotify’s profile and the bundling implications for songwriters and publishers.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Aug 7, 2025
1 min read
Peter Garrett Backs Australian Industry Body’s Push Against AI Exemptions
At stake is AI companies’ ability to train on copyrighted works without permission

Policy & Legal
Aug 6, 2025
1 min read
Sony Music Sues Napster for $9.2M, Alleging Unpaid Royalties
The label is also seeking $37.5M for copyright infringement

Policy & Legal
Aug 5, 2025
1 min read
Michael Jackson’s Daughter Alleges Estate Fund Misuse by Lawyers
Paris has accused the lawyers of skimming money

Peter Garrett Backs Australian Industry Body’s Push Against AI Exemptions
At stake is AI companies’ ability to train on copyrighted works without permission

Rod Yates
Policy
Aug 7, 2025

Sony Music Sues Napster for $9.2M, Alleging Unpaid Royalties
The label is also seeking $37.5M for copyright infringement

Rod Yates
Policy
Aug 6, 2025

Michael Jackson’s Daughter Alleges Estate Fund Misuse by Lawyers
Paris has accused the lawyers of skimming money

Rod Yates
Policy
Aug 5, 2025

Ty Dolla $ign Settles Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Over ‘Vultures 1’ Sample
The suit alleged unlicensed use of a sample in the track “Fuk Sumn”

Harry Levin
Policy
Aug 4, 2025

Led Zeppelin’s Jimmy Page Settles ‘Dazed and Confused’ Lawsuit
The copyright dispute with Jake Holmes has been resolved

Rod Yates
Policy
Aug 4, 2025

Major Creator Orgs Back Pivotal Copyright Case Vetter v. Resnik
At stake is the worldwide application of copyright termination rights

Rod Yates
Policy
Aug 1, 2025