Beyond the “pay for play” narrative, the claim alleges that Spotify knowingly misleads users into believing Discovery Mode is curated based on their individual tastes.
Spotify has called these claims “nonsense.”
Genevieve Capolongo is the named plaintiff. Her lawyers stated she hopes to accrue “millions” of Spotify users in the class.
Spotify provides public insight into how Discovery Mode and editorial playlists are curated via the “About Recommendations” page, but the complaint says that this is insufficient.
Capolongo’s lawyers did not provide any specific evidence to support the claim that popular editorial playlists like RapCaviar and Today’s Top Hits are also pay-for-play. They instead cited confirmations of the practice from anonymous “industry insiders.”
To the specific legalities, the complaint alleges that Spotify violated New York state law in persuading Capolongo to subscribe based on false claims and then being enriched as a result.
The lawsuit: “Spotify exploits that trust by marketing itself as a platform that offers organic music recommendations — whether through its algorithmic or curated playlists — only to secretly sell those recommendations to the highest bidder.”
Spotify: “Not only do they misrepresent what Discovery Mode is and how it works, but they are riddled with misunderstandings and inaccuracies. Discovery Mode is a feature artists can use to flag priority tracks for algorithmic consideration in limited contexts: Radio, Autoplay, and certain Mixes. It doesn’t buy plays, it doesn’t affect editorial playlists, and it’s clearly disclosed in the app and on our website.”