


Spotify Faces Class Action Lawsuit Alleging “Pay For Play” Discovery Mode
The claim states that third-party payments can influence music placements in Discovery Mode and editorial playlists
Spotify is involved in a new class action lawsuit that claims the company takes payments from record labels and artists for slots on Discovery Mode and coveted editorial playlists.
The details:
Beyond the “pay for play” narrative, the claim alleges that Spotify knowingly misleads users into believing Discovery Mode is curated based on their individual tastes.
Spotify has called these claims “nonsense.”
Genevieve Capolongo is the named plaintiff. Her lawyers stated she hopes to accrue “millions” of Spotify users in the class.
Spotify provides public insight into how Discovery Mode and editorial playlists are curated via the “About Recommendations” page, but the complaint says that this is insufficient.
Capolongo’s lawyers did not provide any specific evidence to support the claim that popular editorial playlists like RapCaviar and Today’s Top Hits are also pay-for-play. They instead cited confirmations of the practice from anonymous “industry insiders.”
To the specific legalities, the complaint alleges that Spotify violated New York state law in persuading Capolongo to subscribe based on false claims and then being enriched as a result.
What they said:
The lawsuit: “Spotify exploits that trust by marketing itself as a platform that offers organic music recommendations — whether through its algorithmic or curated playlists — only to secretly sell those recommendations to the highest bidder.”
Spotify: “Not only do they misrepresent what Discovery Mode is and how it works, but they are riddled with misunderstandings and inaccuracies. Discovery Mode is a feature artists can use to flag priority tracks for algorithmic consideration in limited contexts: Radio, Autoplay, and certain Mixes. It doesn’t buy plays, it doesn’t affect editorial playlists, and it’s clearly disclosed in the app and on our website.”
Spotify is involved in a new class action lawsuit that claims the company takes payments from record labels and artists for slots on Discovery Mode and coveted editorial playlists.
The details:
Beyond the “pay for play” narrative, the claim alleges that Spotify knowingly misleads users into believing Discovery Mode is curated based on their individual tastes.
Spotify has called these claims “nonsense.”
Genevieve Capolongo is the named plaintiff. Her lawyers stated she hopes to accrue “millions” of Spotify users in the class.
Spotify provides public insight into how Discovery Mode and editorial playlists are curated via the “About Recommendations” page, but the complaint says that this is insufficient.
Capolongo’s lawyers did not provide any specific evidence to support the claim that popular editorial playlists like RapCaviar and Today’s Top Hits are also pay-for-play. They instead cited confirmations of the practice from anonymous “industry insiders.”
To the specific legalities, the complaint alleges that Spotify violated New York state law in persuading Capolongo to subscribe based on false claims and then being enriched as a result.
What they said:
The lawsuit: “Spotify exploits that trust by marketing itself as a platform that offers organic music recommendations — whether through its algorithmic or curated playlists — only to secretly sell those recommendations to the highest bidder.”
Spotify: “Not only do they misrepresent what Discovery Mode is and how it works, but they are riddled with misunderstandings and inaccuracies. Discovery Mode is a feature artists can use to flag priority tracks for algorithmic consideration in limited contexts: Radio, Autoplay, and certain Mixes. It doesn’t buy plays, it doesn’t affect editorial playlists, and it’s clearly disclosed in the app and on our website.”
Spotify is involved in a new class action lawsuit that claims the company takes payments from record labels and artists for slots on Discovery Mode and coveted editorial playlists.
The details:
Beyond the “pay for play” narrative, the claim alleges that Spotify knowingly misleads users into believing Discovery Mode is curated based on their individual tastes.
Spotify has called these claims “nonsense.”
Genevieve Capolongo is the named plaintiff. Her lawyers stated she hopes to accrue “millions” of Spotify users in the class.
Spotify provides public insight into how Discovery Mode and editorial playlists are curated via the “About Recommendations” page, but the complaint says that this is insufficient.
Capolongo’s lawyers did not provide any specific evidence to support the claim that popular editorial playlists like RapCaviar and Today’s Top Hits are also pay-for-play. They instead cited confirmations of the practice from anonymous “industry insiders.”
To the specific legalities, the complaint alleges that Spotify violated New York state law in persuading Capolongo to subscribe based on false claims and then being enriched as a result.
What they said:
The lawsuit: “Spotify exploits that trust by marketing itself as a platform that offers organic music recommendations — whether through its algorithmic or curated playlists — only to secretly sell those recommendations to the highest bidder.”
Spotify: “Not only do they misrepresent what Discovery Mode is and how it works, but they are riddled with misunderstandings and inaccuracies. Discovery Mode is a feature artists can use to flag priority tracks for algorithmic consideration in limited contexts: Radio, Autoplay, and certain Mixes. It doesn’t buy plays, it doesn’t affect editorial playlists, and it’s clearly disclosed in the app and on our website.”
Spotify
Genevieve Capolongo
Discovery Mode
RapCaviar
Artist Lawsuits and Legal Battles
Industry Litigation
Streaming Platform Features
Platform T&C Scrutiny
Streaming Platform Corruption Allegations
AI-Powered Music Discovery
Anonymous Industry Grievances
Music Industry Legal Battles
Monetizing Algorithmic Placement
Class Action Lawsuit
Litigation
Record Labels
Consumer Protection Law
Streaming Manipulation Allegation
Playlist Bribery
Algorithmic Transparency
United States
Sweden
New York, US
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This article was written with information sourced from Billboard.
- We covered it because of Spotify’s influence on the music industry.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Feb 9, 2026
1 min read
Anna’s Archive Lawsuit May Enter Default Judgement
The pirate group has failed to respond to the suit alleging it scraped 86 millions songs from Spotify

Policy & Legal
Feb 9, 2026
1 min read
Is New York the Next Market to Introduce a Ticket Resale Cap?
Proposed legislation will prevent tickets being resold for more than face value

Policy & Legal
Feb 9, 2026
1 min read
Chris Brown Sued Over Rights and Royalties Dispute
Artist Steve Chokpelle claims Brown released their co-writes without crediting or paying royalties

Anna’s Archive Lawsuit May Enter Default Judgement
The pirate group has failed to respond to the suit alleging it scraped 86 millions songs from Spotify

Harry Levin
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

Is New York the Next Market to Introduce a Ticket Resale Cap?
Proposed legislation will prevent tickets being resold for more than face value

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

Chris Brown Sued Over Rights and Royalties Dispute
Artist Steve Chokpelle claims Brown released their co-writes without crediting or paying royalties

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

Spotify Releases Its Policy Roadmap
Calls for an improvement in metadata quality, safeguards against AI, and more

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

LabelWorx Launches Publishing Division
Artists and labels can opt in on a per-track basis

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 6, 2026

New California Bill Aims to Cap Ticket Resale Prices
Tickets could be resold for no more than 10% above face value

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 6, 2026




