


Spotify Faces Class Action Lawsuit Alleging “Pay For Play” Discovery Mode
The claim states that third-party payments can influence music placements in Discovery Mode and editorial playlists
Spotify is involved in a new class action lawsuit that claims the company takes payments from record labels and artists for slots on Discovery Mode and coveted editorial playlists.
The details:
Beyond the “pay for play” narrative, the claim alleges that Spotify knowingly misleads users into believing Discovery Mode is curated based on their individual tastes.
Spotify has called these claims “nonsense.”
Genevieve Capolongo is the named plaintiff. Her lawyers stated she hopes to accrue “millions” of Spotify users in the class.
Spotify provides public insight into how Discovery Mode and editorial playlists are curated via the “About Recommendations” page, but the complaint says that this is insufficient.
Capolongo’s lawyers did not provide any specific evidence to support the claim that popular editorial playlists like RapCaviar and Today’s Top Hits are also pay-for-play. They instead cited confirmations of the practice from anonymous “industry insiders.”
To the specific legalities, the complaint alleges that Spotify violated New York state law in persuading Capolongo to subscribe based on false claims and then being enriched as a result.
What they said:
The lawsuit: “Spotify exploits that trust by marketing itself as a platform that offers organic music recommendations — whether through its algorithmic or curated playlists — only to secretly sell those recommendations to the highest bidder.”
Spotify: “Not only do they misrepresent what Discovery Mode is and how it works, but they are riddled with misunderstandings and inaccuracies. Discovery Mode is a feature artists can use to flag priority tracks for algorithmic consideration in limited contexts: Radio, Autoplay, and certain Mixes. It doesn’t buy plays, it doesn’t affect editorial playlists, and it’s clearly disclosed in the app and on our website.”
Spotify is involved in a new class action lawsuit that claims the company takes payments from record labels and artists for slots on Discovery Mode and coveted editorial playlists.
The details:
Beyond the “pay for play” narrative, the claim alleges that Spotify knowingly misleads users into believing Discovery Mode is curated based on their individual tastes.
Spotify has called these claims “nonsense.”
Genevieve Capolongo is the named plaintiff. Her lawyers stated she hopes to accrue “millions” of Spotify users in the class.
Spotify provides public insight into how Discovery Mode and editorial playlists are curated via the “About Recommendations” page, but the complaint says that this is insufficient.
Capolongo’s lawyers did not provide any specific evidence to support the claim that popular editorial playlists like RapCaviar and Today’s Top Hits are also pay-for-play. They instead cited confirmations of the practice from anonymous “industry insiders.”
To the specific legalities, the complaint alleges that Spotify violated New York state law in persuading Capolongo to subscribe based on false claims and then being enriched as a result.
What they said:
The lawsuit: “Spotify exploits that trust by marketing itself as a platform that offers organic music recommendations — whether through its algorithmic or curated playlists — only to secretly sell those recommendations to the highest bidder.”
Spotify: “Not only do they misrepresent what Discovery Mode is and how it works, but they are riddled with misunderstandings and inaccuracies. Discovery Mode is a feature artists can use to flag priority tracks for algorithmic consideration in limited contexts: Radio, Autoplay, and certain Mixes. It doesn’t buy plays, it doesn’t affect editorial playlists, and it’s clearly disclosed in the app and on our website.”
Spotify is involved in a new class action lawsuit that claims the company takes payments from record labels and artists for slots on Discovery Mode and coveted editorial playlists.
The details:
Beyond the “pay for play” narrative, the claim alleges that Spotify knowingly misleads users into believing Discovery Mode is curated based on their individual tastes.
Spotify has called these claims “nonsense.”
Genevieve Capolongo is the named plaintiff. Her lawyers stated she hopes to accrue “millions” of Spotify users in the class.
Spotify provides public insight into how Discovery Mode and editorial playlists are curated via the “About Recommendations” page, but the complaint says that this is insufficient.
Capolongo’s lawyers did not provide any specific evidence to support the claim that popular editorial playlists like RapCaviar and Today’s Top Hits are also pay-for-play. They instead cited confirmations of the practice from anonymous “industry insiders.”
To the specific legalities, the complaint alleges that Spotify violated New York state law in persuading Capolongo to subscribe based on false claims and then being enriched as a result.
What they said:
The lawsuit: “Spotify exploits that trust by marketing itself as a platform that offers organic music recommendations — whether through its algorithmic or curated playlists — only to secretly sell those recommendations to the highest bidder.”
Spotify: “Not only do they misrepresent what Discovery Mode is and how it works, but they are riddled with misunderstandings and inaccuracies. Discovery Mode is a feature artists can use to flag priority tracks for algorithmic consideration in limited contexts: Radio, Autoplay, and certain Mixes. It doesn’t buy plays, it doesn’t affect editorial playlists, and it’s clearly disclosed in the app and on our website.”
Spotify
Genevieve Capolongo
Discovery Mode
RapCaviar
Artist Lawsuits and Legal Battles
Industry Litigation
Streaming Platform Features
Platform T&C Scrutiny
Streaming Platform Corruption Allegations
AI-Powered Music Discovery
Anonymous Industry Grievances
Music Industry Legal Battles
Monetizing Algorithmic Placement
Class Action Lawsuit
Litigation
Record Labels
Consumer Protection Law
Streaming Manipulation Allegation
Playlist Bribery
Algorithmic Transparency
United States
Sweden
New York, US
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This article was written with information sourced from Billboard.
- We covered it because of Spotify’s influence on the music industry.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Nov 5, 2025
1 min read
Suno Sued by Danish Songwriter Collecting Society Koda
It alleges “the biggest theft in music history”

Policy & Legal
Nov 4, 2025
1 min read
StubHub Faces Class Action Over ‘FanProtect Guarantee’
A disgruntled Taylor Swift fan is the lead plaintiff

Policy & Legal
Nov 4, 2025
1 min read
Spotify Faces Class Action Claiming Fraud in Drake Streams
The artist himself is not, however, implicated

Suno Sued by Danish Songwriter Collecting Society Koda
It alleges “the biggest theft in music history”

Rod Yates
Policy
Nov 5, 2025

StubHub Faces Class Action Over ‘FanProtect Guarantee’
A disgruntled Taylor Swift fan is the lead plaintiff

Rod Yates
Policy
Nov 4, 2025

Spotify Faces Class Action Claiming Fraud in Drake Streams
The artist himself is not, however, implicated

Rod Yates
Policy
Nov 4, 2025

Music Artists Coalition Lays Out Ethical Guidelines in Wake of UMG/Udio Deal
The artist advocacy group released a statement in response to the new partnership between the major label and the prominent AI company

Harry Levin
Policy
Nov 3, 2025

Udio Allows Downloads for 48 Hours Following UMG Deal Outcry
The gen AI music platform yielded to the demands of angry subscribers

Rod Yates
Policy
Nov 3, 2025

Live Nation, Ticketmaster Face Lawsuit Over Ticketing Technology Patent
The suit was filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York

Rod Yates
Policy
Nov 3, 2025



