


Spotify Denies Changing its Terms for Artists
Dismisses the accusations as “misinformation”
Accusations have been circulating online that Spotify has modified its terms and conditions for artists, permitting it to transfer the rights to creators’ music, podcasts and audio books to third parties.
The claims:
Entertainment attorney Krystle Delgado summarizes the update here.
In it she acknowledges that the T&Cs don’t apply to music creators, as they are the terms of service for someone using Spotify.
She then states: “Well, let me ask this question: You, music creator that has your music on Spotify, do you happen to have a personal Spotify account of which you consume music through? If the answer happens to be yes, then you absolutely, as a music creator, have agreed to this contract.”
The response:
Spotify has issued a statement saying the updated terms do not “govern Spotify’s rights to use artists’, podcasters’, creators’, or authors’ creative works.”
Instead, it claims the terms govern what “listeners can and cannot do on our platform.”
The terms enable Spotify “to display features such as user-created custom playlist covers, user comments on podcasts, and user-created playlist titles.”
It concludes: “The recent changes to our listener Terms of Use do not impact how artists’, podcasters’, creators’, and authors’ music, shows, and/or audiobooks are distributed on our platform, what rights they retain, or what Spotify does with their work.”
Accusations have been circulating online that Spotify has modified its terms and conditions for artists, permitting it to transfer the rights to creators’ music, podcasts and audio books to third parties.
The claims:
Entertainment attorney Krystle Delgado summarizes the update here.
In it she acknowledges that the T&Cs don’t apply to music creators, as they are the terms of service for someone using Spotify.
She then states: “Well, let me ask this question: You, music creator that has your music on Spotify, do you happen to have a personal Spotify account of which you consume music through? If the answer happens to be yes, then you absolutely, as a music creator, have agreed to this contract.”
The response:
Spotify has issued a statement saying the updated terms do not “govern Spotify’s rights to use artists’, podcasters’, creators’, or authors’ creative works.”
Instead, it claims the terms govern what “listeners can and cannot do on our platform.”
The terms enable Spotify “to display features such as user-created custom playlist covers, user comments on podcasts, and user-created playlist titles.”
It concludes: “The recent changes to our listener Terms of Use do not impact how artists’, podcasters’, creators’, and authors’ music, shows, and/or audiobooks are distributed on our platform, what rights they retain, or what Spotify does with their work.”
Accusations have been circulating online that Spotify has modified its terms and conditions for artists, permitting it to transfer the rights to creators’ music, podcasts and audio books to third parties.
The claims:
Entertainment attorney Krystle Delgado summarizes the update here.
In it she acknowledges that the T&Cs don’t apply to music creators, as they are the terms of service for someone using Spotify.
She then states: “Well, let me ask this question: You, music creator that has your music on Spotify, do you happen to have a personal Spotify account of which you consume music through? If the answer happens to be yes, then you absolutely, as a music creator, have agreed to this contract.”
The response:
Spotify has issued a statement saying the updated terms do not “govern Spotify’s rights to use artists’, podcasters’, creators’, or authors’ creative works.”
Instead, it claims the terms govern what “listeners can and cannot do on our platform.”
The terms enable Spotify “to display features such as user-created custom playlist covers, user comments on podcasts, and user-created playlist titles.”
It concludes: “The recent changes to our listener Terms of Use do not impact how artists’, podcasters’, creators’, and authors’ music, shows, and/or audiobooks are distributed on our platform, what rights they retain, or what Spotify does with their work.”
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
This story was written with information from Digital Music News, TechCrunch and Spotify.
We covered it because it relates to Spotify’s terms of service.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Feb 9, 2026
1 min read
Anna’s Archive Lawsuit May Enter Default Judgement
The pirate group has failed to respond to the suit alleging it scraped 86 millions songs from Spotify

Policy & Legal
Feb 9, 2026
1 min read
Is New York the Next Market to Introduce a Ticket Resale Cap?
Proposed legislation will prevent tickets being resold for more than face value

Policy & Legal
Feb 9, 2026
1 min read
Chris Brown Sued Over Rights and Royalties Dispute
Artist Steve Chokpelle claims Brown released their co-writes without crediting or paying royalties

Anna’s Archive Lawsuit May Enter Default Judgement
The pirate group has failed to respond to the suit alleging it scraped 86 millions songs from Spotify

Harry Levin
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

Is New York the Next Market to Introduce a Ticket Resale Cap?
Proposed legislation will prevent tickets being resold for more than face value

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

Chris Brown Sued Over Rights and Royalties Dispute
Artist Steve Chokpelle claims Brown released their co-writes without crediting or paying royalties

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

Spotify Releases Its Policy Roadmap
Calls for an improvement in metadata quality, safeguards against AI, and more

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

LabelWorx Launches Publishing Division
Artists and labels can opt in on a per-track basis

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 6, 2026

New California Bill Aims to Cap Ticket Resale Prices
Tickets could be resold for no more than 10% above face value

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 6, 2026




