


Suno Begins Updating Policies Under Agreement With WMG
The AI music company has altered the Rights & Ownership section on its website with new information
Suno, the prominent AI music creation platform, has apparently begun the process of implementing the new policies stemming from its sweeping deal with Warner Music Group (WMG). The two companies settled a long-term lawsuit alongside striking the new agreement back in November, and now, back-end updates to Suno are emerging.
The details:
Regarding commercial use rights, not much language has changed, but certain words are now bolded. See below:
“Songs made while subscribed (to a Pro or Premier plan) are granted commercial use rights.”
“Songs made on the free plan (not subscribed) are only available for non-commercial use and cannot be monetized.”
“Starting a subscription after you made a great song will not give you a retroactive license for the song.” Though the website does list possible scenarios where retroactive licenses can be provided to “specific songs.”
A more significant change relates to copyright ownership. Prior to the deal, Suno granted ownership of the music to the user. Now, the language is more vague:
“You may be granted commercial use rights, which allow you to reproduce (copy) the song(s) to sell, distribute, etc. Even with granted commercial use rights, you generally are not considered the owner of the songs, since the output was generated by Suno.”
Another section reads: “We can't guarantee that what you input was yours, and we can't guarantee that the output won't be similar to other outputs we generate.”
The above signals a greater concession to different owners, such as labels and artists.
Suno, the prominent AI music creation platform, has apparently begun the process of implementing the new policies stemming from its sweeping deal with Warner Music Group (WMG). The two companies settled a long-term lawsuit alongside striking the new agreement back in November, and now, back-end updates to Suno are emerging.
The details:
Regarding commercial use rights, not much language has changed, but certain words are now bolded. See below:
“Songs made while subscribed (to a Pro or Premier plan) are granted commercial use rights.”
“Songs made on the free plan (not subscribed) are only available for non-commercial use and cannot be monetized.”
“Starting a subscription after you made a great song will not give you a retroactive license for the song.” Though the website does list possible scenarios where retroactive licenses can be provided to “specific songs.”
A more significant change relates to copyright ownership. Prior to the deal, Suno granted ownership of the music to the user. Now, the language is more vague:
“You may be granted commercial use rights, which allow you to reproduce (copy) the song(s) to sell, distribute, etc. Even with granted commercial use rights, you generally are not considered the owner of the songs, since the output was generated by Suno.”
Another section reads: “We can't guarantee that what you input was yours, and we can't guarantee that the output won't be similar to other outputs we generate.”
The above signals a greater concession to different owners, such as labels and artists.
Suno, the prominent AI music creation platform, has apparently begun the process of implementing the new policies stemming from its sweeping deal with Warner Music Group (WMG). The two companies settled a long-term lawsuit alongside striking the new agreement back in November, and now, back-end updates to Suno are emerging.
The details:
Regarding commercial use rights, not much language has changed, but certain words are now bolded. See below:
“Songs made while subscribed (to a Pro or Premier plan) are granted commercial use rights.”
“Songs made on the free plan (not subscribed) are only available for non-commercial use and cannot be monetized.”
“Starting a subscription after you made a great song will not give you a retroactive license for the song.” Though the website does list possible scenarios where retroactive licenses can be provided to “specific songs.”
A more significant change relates to copyright ownership. Prior to the deal, Suno granted ownership of the music to the user. Now, the language is more vague:
“You may be granted commercial use rights, which allow you to reproduce (copy) the song(s) to sell, distribute, etc. Even with granted commercial use rights, you generally are not considered the owner of the songs, since the output was generated by Suno.”
Another section reads: “We can't guarantee that what you input was yours, and we can't guarantee that the output won't be similar to other outputs we generate.”
The above signals a greater concession to different owners, such as labels and artists.
Suno
Warner Music Group
WMG
Platform T&C Scrutiny
AI Music Regulation
AI Copyright Battles
Legal Battles Over AI Content
Shift From AI Litigation To Licensing
AI's Role in Music Creation and IP
AI and Copyright
Platform Retains AI Output Ownership
AI Music Creation
Terms of Service
Copyright Policy
AI Licensing Deals
Litigation
Record Labels
Commercial Use Rights
United States
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
This article was written with information sourced from Digital Music News.
We covered it because of Suno’s influence on AI in music.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Feb 9, 2026
1 min read
Anna’s Archive Lawsuit May Enter Default Judgement
The pirate group has failed to respond to the suit alleging it scraped 86 millions songs from Spotify

Policy & Legal
Feb 9, 2026
1 min read
Is New York the Next Market to Introduce a Ticket Resale Cap?
Proposed legislation will prevent tickets being resold for more than face value

Policy & Legal
Feb 9, 2026
1 min read
Chris Brown Sued Over Rights and Royalties Dispute
Artist Steve Chokpelle claims Brown released their co-writes without crediting or paying royalties

Anna’s Archive Lawsuit May Enter Default Judgement
The pirate group has failed to respond to the suit alleging it scraped 86 millions songs from Spotify

Harry Levin
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

Is New York the Next Market to Introduce a Ticket Resale Cap?
Proposed legislation will prevent tickets being resold for more than face value

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

Chris Brown Sued Over Rights and Royalties Dispute
Artist Steve Chokpelle claims Brown released their co-writes without crediting or paying royalties

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

Spotify Releases Its Policy Roadmap
Calls for an improvement in metadata quality, safeguards against AI, and more

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

LabelWorx Launches Publishing Division
Artists and labels can opt in on a per-track basis

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 6, 2026

New California Bill Aims to Cap Ticket Resale Prices
Tickets could be resold for no more than 10% above face value

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 6, 2026




