


Paul McCartney Contributes Track to Silent Album Protesting Proposed AI Copyright Law
The Beatles legend joins artists including Hans Zimmer, Sam Fender, and Damon Albarn
Sir Paul McCartney has added a track to the vinyl version of the silent album, Is This What We Want?, curated by UK artists to protest a proposed AI copyright law. The LP consists of recordings of silent studios and performance spaces, emphasizing the idea of a music industry without human beings.
Why it matters:
The UK law central to the protest would make it easier to use copyrighted material to train AI without a license.
Back in January, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer proposed an “opt-out” system for using copyrighted material to train AI.
The proposal came as part of a 50-point plan for the UK to be competitive in the rise of AI technology.
Following backlash from protests such as this album, the government has begun reviewing its stance on AI and copyrighted material.
Background:
“1,000 UK Artists” technically released the album, alluding to the over 1,000 artists and organizations who have signed on in protest of the proposed law.
The digital version of the album was released in February.
The vinyl version will be out on December 8. All profits will be donated to Help Musicians, a charity dedicated to supporting musicians in the UK.
What they said:
Ed Newton-Rex, Founder of the AI watchdog organization Fairly Trained, and organizer of the silent album: “The government must commit to not handing the life’s work of the country’s musicians to AI companies for free. Doing so would be hugely damaging to our world-leading creative industries and is totally unnecessary, only benefiting overseas tech giants. It should listen to Paul McCartney and the 1,000 other musicians who took part in this album, and resist calls to legalise music theft from the big tech lobby.”
Sir Paul McCartney has added a track to the vinyl version of the silent album, Is This What We Want?, curated by UK artists to protest a proposed AI copyright law. The LP consists of recordings of silent studios and performance spaces, emphasizing the idea of a music industry without human beings.
Why it matters:
The UK law central to the protest would make it easier to use copyrighted material to train AI without a license.
Back in January, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer proposed an “opt-out” system for using copyrighted material to train AI.
The proposal came as part of a 50-point plan for the UK to be competitive in the rise of AI technology.
Following backlash from protests such as this album, the government has begun reviewing its stance on AI and copyrighted material.
Background:
“1,000 UK Artists” technically released the album, alluding to the over 1,000 artists and organizations who have signed on in protest of the proposed law.
The digital version of the album was released in February.
The vinyl version will be out on December 8. All profits will be donated to Help Musicians, a charity dedicated to supporting musicians in the UK.
What they said:
Ed Newton-Rex, Founder of the AI watchdog organization Fairly Trained, and organizer of the silent album: “The government must commit to not handing the life’s work of the country’s musicians to AI companies for free. Doing so would be hugely damaging to our world-leading creative industries and is totally unnecessary, only benefiting overseas tech giants. It should listen to Paul McCartney and the 1,000 other musicians who took part in this album, and resist calls to legalise music theft from the big tech lobby.”
Sir Paul McCartney has added a track to the vinyl version of the silent album, Is This What We Want?, curated by UK artists to protest a proposed AI copyright law. The LP consists of recordings of silent studios and performance spaces, emphasizing the idea of a music industry without human beings.
Why it matters:
The UK law central to the protest would make it easier to use copyrighted material to train AI without a license.
Back in January, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer proposed an “opt-out” system for using copyrighted material to train AI.
The proposal came as part of a 50-point plan for the UK to be competitive in the rise of AI technology.
Following backlash from protests such as this album, the government has begun reviewing its stance on AI and copyrighted material.
Background:
“1,000 UK Artists” technically released the album, alluding to the over 1,000 artists and organizations who have signed on in protest of the proposed law.
The digital version of the album was released in February.
The vinyl version will be out on December 8. All profits will be donated to Help Musicians, a charity dedicated to supporting musicians in the UK.
What they said:
Ed Newton-Rex, Founder of the AI watchdog organization Fairly Trained, and organizer of the silent album: “The government must commit to not handing the life’s work of the country’s musicians to AI companies for free. Doing so would be hugely damaging to our world-leading creative industries and is totally unnecessary, only benefiting overseas tech giants. It should listen to Paul McCartney and the 1,000 other musicians who took part in this album, and resist calls to legalise music theft from the big tech lobby.”
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This article was written with information sourced from Music Business Worldwide and The Guardian.
- We covered it because of the conversation around AI in the music industry.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Dec 4, 2025
1 min read
Trump Pardons Former OVG CEO Tim Leiweke On Bid Rigging Indictment
Leiweke’s charges pertained to contracts for Austin’s Moody Center arena

Policy & Legal
Dec 4, 2025
1 min read
Cultural Exchange Coalition Seeks to Ease Post-Brexit Touring Hurdles
Artists and industry groups unite to improve cultural exchange between the UK and EU

Policy & Legal
Dec 3, 2025
1 min read
Gene Simmons to Testify Before Senate to Support Artist Radio Play Compensation
Dissimilar to streaming, AM and FM radio do not currently require royalty payouts for every play

Trump Pardons Former OVG CEO Tim Leiweke On Bid Rigging Indictment
Leiweke’s charges pertained to contracts for Austin’s Moody Center arena

Harry Levin
Policy
Dec 4, 2025

Cultural Exchange Coalition Seeks to Ease Post-Brexit Touring Hurdles
Artists and industry groups unite to improve cultural exchange between the UK and EU

Rod Yates
Policy
Dec 4, 2025

Gene Simmons to Testify Before Senate to Support Artist Radio Play Compensation
Dissimilar to streaming, AM and FM radio do not currently require royalty payouts for every play

Harry Levin
Policy
Dec 3, 2025

WMG Sues US Fashion Retailer PacSun
The label alleges unauthorized use of 290+ works on TikTok, Instagram

Rod Yates
Policy
Dec 3, 2025

Jorja Smith’s Label Hits Back at ‘I Run,’ Demands Cut of the Track
FAMM claims the song infringes Smith’s rights

Rod Yates
Policy
Dec 3, 2025

Daddy Yankee Files Lawsuit Against Raphy Pina Over Allegedly Diverted Royalties
The suit claims that the Puerto Rican artist is owed millions from his former manager

Harry Levin
Policy
Dec 2, 2025



