


Major Labels Expand Suno Lawsuit to Include Piracy Claims
The move comes in the wake of Anthropic’s $1.5bn settlement
The major labels have amended their claim against Suno, alleging the AI music creation platform illegally obtained the sound recordings it copied into its dataset.
The amendment:
The labels allege that “many if not all” the sound recordings used by Suno to train its model were “illicitly” downloaded from YouTube using a method of music piracy known as “stream ripping.”
Why it matters:
In the recent case between a group of authors and AI company Anthropic, a judge ruled that while AI training constitutes “fair use” of the source material, it’s only legal if the material comes from legitimate channels.
Anthropic had downloaded millions of e-books from piracy sites to train its model.
Following the judge’s ruling it opted to enter a provisional $1.5bn settlement deal with the lawyers representing the American authors.
As per Complete Music Update, the majors claim that ripping music files from YouTube violates the site’s terms and conditions, and breaches the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
In other words, it sourced its training data through piracy.
The lawsuit states: “By ‘stream ripping’ audio files from YouTube, Suno circumnavigated technological measures implemented by YouTube that effectively control access to copyrighted works in violation of the US Copyright Act.”
The major labels have amended their claim against Suno, alleging the AI music creation platform illegally obtained the sound recordings it copied into its dataset.
The amendment:
The labels allege that “many if not all” the sound recordings used by Suno to train its model were “illicitly” downloaded from YouTube using a method of music piracy known as “stream ripping.”
Why it matters:
In the recent case between a group of authors and AI company Anthropic, a judge ruled that while AI training constitutes “fair use” of the source material, it’s only legal if the material comes from legitimate channels.
Anthropic had downloaded millions of e-books from piracy sites to train its model.
Following the judge’s ruling it opted to enter a provisional $1.5bn settlement deal with the lawyers representing the American authors.
As per Complete Music Update, the majors claim that ripping music files from YouTube violates the site’s terms and conditions, and breaches the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
In other words, it sourced its training data through piracy.
The lawsuit states: “By ‘stream ripping’ audio files from YouTube, Suno circumnavigated technological measures implemented by YouTube that effectively control access to copyrighted works in violation of the US Copyright Act.”
The major labels have amended their claim against Suno, alleging the AI music creation platform illegally obtained the sound recordings it copied into its dataset.
The amendment:
The labels allege that “many if not all” the sound recordings used by Suno to train its model were “illicitly” downloaded from YouTube using a method of music piracy known as “stream ripping.”
Why it matters:
In the recent case between a group of authors and AI company Anthropic, a judge ruled that while AI training constitutes “fair use” of the source material, it’s only legal if the material comes from legitimate channels.
Anthropic had downloaded millions of e-books from piracy sites to train its model.
Following the judge’s ruling it opted to enter a provisional $1.5bn settlement deal with the lawyers representing the American authors.
As per Complete Music Update, the majors claim that ripping music files from YouTube violates the site’s terms and conditions, and breaches the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
In other words, it sourced its training data through piracy.
The lawsuit states: “By ‘stream ripping’ audio files from YouTube, Suno circumnavigated technological measures implemented by YouTube that effectively control access to copyrighted works in violation of the US Copyright Act.”
Suno
YouTube
Anthropic
Digital Millennium Copyright Act
Complete Music Update
AI Copyright Battles
Legal Battles Over AI Music
AI and Copyright
AI Training Controversies
Major Label Lawsuits
Ethical AI Music Sourcing
Platform Liability For AI Content
Judicial Split On AI Fair Use
AI's Role in Music Creation and IP
AI Training Data Provenance
Litigation
Copyright Infringement
AI Copyright Litigation
Fair Use Doctrine
Streaming Piracy
Pirate Site Training Data
Major Labels
Record Labels
Contributory Infringement
Stream Ripping
United States
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
This story was written with information sourced from Complete Music Update.
We covered it because it’s news in the ongoing lawsuit against Suno.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Feb 9, 2026
1 min read
Anna’s Archive Lawsuit May Enter Default Judgement
The pirate group has failed to respond to the suit alleging it scraped 86 millions songs from Spotify

Policy & Legal
Feb 9, 2026
1 min read
Is New York the Next Market to Introduce a Ticket Resale Cap?
Proposed legislation will prevent tickets being resold for more than face value

Policy & Legal
Feb 9, 2026
1 min read
Chris Brown Sued Over Rights and Royalties Dispute
Artist Steve Chokpelle claims Brown released their co-writes without crediting or paying royalties

Anna’s Archive Lawsuit May Enter Default Judgement
The pirate group has failed to respond to the suit alleging it scraped 86 millions songs from Spotify

Harry Levin
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

Is New York the Next Market to Introduce a Ticket Resale Cap?
Proposed legislation will prevent tickets being resold for more than face value

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

Chris Brown Sued Over Rights and Royalties Dispute
Artist Steve Chokpelle claims Brown released their co-writes without crediting or paying royalties

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

Spotify Releases Its Policy Roadmap
Calls for an improvement in metadata quality, safeguards against AI, and more

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

LabelWorx Launches Publishing Division
Artists and labels can opt in on a per-track basis

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 6, 2026

New California Bill Aims to Cap Ticket Resale Prices
Tickets could be resold for no more than 10% above face value

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 6, 2026




