


Drake Linked to Alleged Funding of Fake Spotify Streams
The class action is tied to the rapper’s endorsement of online casino Stake
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Canadian rapper Drake, online sweepstake casino Stake, streamer Adin Ross and Australian George Nguyen for allegedly colluding to finance music botting campaigns.
The accusations:
As per Billboard Canada, the case is brought by Virginia residents and Stake users LaShawnna Ridley and Tiffany Hines, and alleges that Stake illegally uses “virtual currency” to evade anti-gambling laws.
The complainants also assert that the platform misrepresents that it is legal, harmless, and safe, and preys on consumers and lures them into real-money gambling.
Fake streams:
The complaint alleges that Drake, alongside Ross and Nguyen, has used Stake.com and Stake.us to “covertly finance the orchestrated procurement of botting and streaming farm activities to artificially inflate the number of plays attributed to Drake’s catalogue across major digital streaming services such as Spotify.”
In a press release issued by the law firm representing Ridley and Hines, Impresa Legal Group alleges Drake and Ross transmitted money to Nguyen via Stake’s “wholly encrypted and substantially unregulated” Tipping feature.
It asserts that Nguyen then used that money to coordinate “directly with bot vendors, clipping channels and streaming farms to artificially inflate play counts of Drake’s music and suppress the success of other music artists.”
Other suits:
In October Drake and Ross were hit with another class action lawsuit accusing the duo of promoting illegal gambling by endorsing Stake, and of carrying out “exploitative marketing” for the company.
The response:
Drake’s representatives are yet to comment.
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Canadian rapper Drake, online sweepstake casino Stake, streamer Adin Ross and Australian George Nguyen for allegedly colluding to finance music botting campaigns.
The accusations:
As per Billboard Canada, the case is brought by Virginia residents and Stake users LaShawnna Ridley and Tiffany Hines, and alleges that Stake illegally uses “virtual currency” to evade anti-gambling laws.
The complainants also assert that the platform misrepresents that it is legal, harmless, and safe, and preys on consumers and lures them into real-money gambling.
Fake streams:
The complaint alleges that Drake, alongside Ross and Nguyen, has used Stake.com and Stake.us to “covertly finance the orchestrated procurement of botting and streaming farm activities to artificially inflate the number of plays attributed to Drake’s catalogue across major digital streaming services such as Spotify.”
In a press release issued by the law firm representing Ridley and Hines, Impresa Legal Group alleges Drake and Ross transmitted money to Nguyen via Stake’s “wholly encrypted and substantially unregulated” Tipping feature.
It asserts that Nguyen then used that money to coordinate “directly with bot vendors, clipping channels and streaming farms to artificially inflate play counts of Drake’s music and suppress the success of other music artists.”
Other suits:
In October Drake and Ross were hit with another class action lawsuit accusing the duo of promoting illegal gambling by endorsing Stake, and of carrying out “exploitative marketing” for the company.
The response:
Drake’s representatives are yet to comment.
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Canadian rapper Drake, online sweepstake casino Stake, streamer Adin Ross and Australian George Nguyen for allegedly colluding to finance music botting campaigns.
The accusations:
As per Billboard Canada, the case is brought by Virginia residents and Stake users LaShawnna Ridley and Tiffany Hines, and alleges that Stake illegally uses “virtual currency” to evade anti-gambling laws.
The complainants also assert that the platform misrepresents that it is legal, harmless, and safe, and preys on consumers and lures them into real-money gambling.
Fake streams:
The complaint alleges that Drake, alongside Ross and Nguyen, has used Stake.com and Stake.us to “covertly finance the orchestrated procurement of botting and streaming farm activities to artificially inflate the number of plays attributed to Drake’s catalogue across major digital streaming services such as Spotify.”
In a press release issued by the law firm representing Ridley and Hines, Impresa Legal Group alleges Drake and Ross transmitted money to Nguyen via Stake’s “wholly encrypted and substantially unregulated” Tipping feature.
It asserts that Nguyen then used that money to coordinate “directly with bot vendors, clipping channels and streaming farms to artificially inflate play counts of Drake’s music and suppress the success of other music artists.”
Other suits:
In October Drake and Ross were hit with another class action lawsuit accusing the duo of promoting illegal gambling by endorsing Stake, and of carrying out “exploitative marketing” for the company.
The response:
Drake’s representatives are yet to comment.
Drake
Stake
Adin Ross
George Nguyen
LaShawnna Ridley
Tiffany Hines
Impresa Legal Group
Spotify
Artist Liability In Gambling Promotions
Artist Lawsuits and Legal Battles
High-Profile Artist Litigation
Industry Litigation
Legal Scrutiny Of Major Artists
Music Industry Legal Battles
Rising Tide of Music Litigation
Streaming Fraud Prevention
Streaming Platform Corruption Allegations
Gambling Platform-Artist Partnerships
Class Action Lawsuit
Legal & Litigation
Legal Disputes
Litigation
Streaming Fraud
Streaming Manipulation Allegation
Music Botting
Canada
United States
Australia
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
This story was written with information from Billboard Canada and Impresa Legal Group’s press release.
We covered it because it’s news of a criminal investigation involving Drake.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Feb 10, 2026
1 min read
Joe Rinaldi Appointed President of NIVA California
The organization has outlined a strategic four-pillar focus for 2026

Policy & Legal
Feb 10, 2026
1 min read
Pandora and the MLC Escalate Royalties Dispute
Each has requested summary judgment in their favor

Policy & Legal
Feb 9, 2026
1 min read
Anna’s Archive Lawsuit May Enter Default Judgement
The pirate group has failed to respond to the suit alleging it scraped 86 millions songs from Spotify

Joe Rinaldi Appointed President of NIVA California
The organization has outlined a strategic four-pillar focus for 2026

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 10, 2026

Pandora and the MLC Escalate Royalties Dispute
Each has requested summary judgment in their favor

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 10, 2026

Anna’s Archive Lawsuit May Enter Default Judgement
The pirate group has failed to respond to the suit alleging it scraped 86 millions songs from Spotify

Harry Levin
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

Is New York the Next Market to Introduce a Ticket Resale Cap?
Proposed legislation will prevent tickets being resold for more than face value

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

Chris Brown Sued Over Rights and Royalties Dispute
Artist Steve Chokpelle claims Brown released their co-writes without crediting or paying royalties

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 9, 2026

Spotify Releases Its Policy Roadmap
Calls for an improvement in metadata quality, safeguards against AI, and more

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 9, 2026





