2 min read

Britain Changes Stance on AI Training Using Copyrighted Music

“The Government no longer has a preferred option”

The UK Government has reversed its stance on artificial intelligence companies training their models on copyrighted material without permission from rightsholders or artists.

Why it matters:

  • The Government had previously been considering a “commercial research exception,” which would have allowed AI developers to use copyrighted material for training purposes without seeking permission.

  • They would only have needed to secure licenses if bringing any resulting products to market.

  • This was met with significant resistance from the creative industries, fearing it would shift the balance of power in favor of AI developers and reduce rightsholders’ negotiating power.

Moving forward:

  • In a statement by Liz Kendall, Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, the minister wrote: “We have listened. We have engaged extensively with creatives, AI firms, industry bodies, unions, academics and AI adopters, and that engagement has shaped our approach.”

  • She added: “We can confirm today that the Government no longer has a preferred option.”

Next steps:

  • The Government has identified four areas of focus as it continues to establish its AI policy in regards copyright and the creative industries.

  • They include preventing misuse of AI-generated likenesses; labeling AI-generated content; publishing a review of the mechanisms available for creators to control their works online; and whether the Government can support independent and smaller creative organizations’ ability to license their content.

The response:

  • Tom Kiehl, CEO of UK Music, which represents musicians, record labels, artist managers and publishers: “We support the Government’s decision to push the reset button on the debate on AI and copyright… The 220,000 people in our sector which generates £8 billion ($10.6 billion) for the UK economy should be entitled to work and earn a living without the constant fear that the fruits of their labor could effectively be taken by AI firms without payment or permission.”

👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
  • This story was written with information from Music Business Worldwide and Liz Kendall’s statement.

  • We covered it because it’s news of the UK Government’s stance on AI training on copyrighted music.

📨 Subscribe to NIF

Get news dropped in your inbox 👇

📨 Subscribe to NIF

Get news dropped in your inbox 👇