


Salt-N-Pepa Lose Bid to Reclaim Master Recordings From UMG
Court rules they’ve never owned the master rights
A New York judge has dismissed Salt-N-Pepa’s lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG) in which the hip-hop trailblazers sought to gain control over their master recordings.
Backstory:
Cheryl “Salt” James and Sandra “Pepa” Denton filed the lawsuit in 2025.
It referenced the Copyright Act of 1976, which enables artists to reclaim their copyright after 35 years.
The judgment:
In granting UMG’s motion to dismiss, Judge Denise Cote noted that Salt-N-Pepa never owned their master tapes.
The contracts for the recordings were between their first label Noise in the Attic (NITA) Productions, to whom the group had granted ownership, and Next Plateau Records.
In her dismissal, the Judge noted that “the statutory text in § 203 is clear: Plaintiffs can only terminate copyright transfers that they executed. They cannot terminate a copyright grant executed by NITA. As a result, Plaintiffs do not plausibly allege a claim for declaratory relief.”
What they said:
James and Denton (in a statement to Variety): “We respectfully disagree with the Court’s decision and fully intend to pursue our rights on appeal. We, Cheryl James and Sandra Denton, also known as the Hip Hop icons Salt-N-Pepa, are the creative and driving force behind all our sound recordings and have performed these songs over the past 40 years. We remain committed to vindicating and reclaiming our rights as creators under the Copyright Act.”
A New York judge has dismissed Salt-N-Pepa’s lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG) in which the hip-hop trailblazers sought to gain control over their master recordings.
Backstory:
Cheryl “Salt” James and Sandra “Pepa” Denton filed the lawsuit in 2025.
It referenced the Copyright Act of 1976, which enables artists to reclaim their copyright after 35 years.
The judgment:
In granting UMG’s motion to dismiss, Judge Denise Cote noted that Salt-N-Pepa never owned their master tapes.
The contracts for the recordings were between their first label Noise in the Attic (NITA) Productions, to whom the group had granted ownership, and Next Plateau Records.
In her dismissal, the Judge noted that “the statutory text in § 203 is clear: Plaintiffs can only terminate copyright transfers that they executed. They cannot terminate a copyright grant executed by NITA. As a result, Plaintiffs do not plausibly allege a claim for declaratory relief.”
What they said:
James and Denton (in a statement to Variety): “We respectfully disagree with the Court’s decision and fully intend to pursue our rights on appeal. We, Cheryl James and Sandra Denton, also known as the Hip Hop icons Salt-N-Pepa, are the creative and driving force behind all our sound recordings and have performed these songs over the past 40 years. We remain committed to vindicating and reclaiming our rights as creators under the Copyright Act.”
A New York judge has dismissed Salt-N-Pepa’s lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG) in which the hip-hop trailblazers sought to gain control over their master recordings.
Backstory:
Cheryl “Salt” James and Sandra “Pepa” Denton filed the lawsuit in 2025.
It referenced the Copyright Act of 1976, which enables artists to reclaim their copyright after 35 years.
The judgment:
In granting UMG’s motion to dismiss, Judge Denise Cote noted that Salt-N-Pepa never owned their master tapes.
The contracts for the recordings were between their first label Noise in the Attic (NITA) Productions, to whom the group had granted ownership, and Next Plateau Records.
In her dismissal, the Judge noted that “the statutory text in § 203 is clear: Plaintiffs can only terminate copyright transfers that they executed. They cannot terminate a copyright grant executed by NITA. As a result, Plaintiffs do not plausibly allege a claim for declaratory relief.”
What they said:
James and Denton (in a statement to Variety): “We respectfully disagree with the Court’s decision and fully intend to pursue our rights on appeal. We, Cheryl James and Sandra Denton, also known as the Hip Hop icons Salt-N-Pepa, are the creative and driving force behind all our sound recordings and have performed these songs over the past 40 years. We remain committed to vindicating and reclaiming our rights as creators under the Copyright Act.”
Salt-N-Pepa
Universal Music Group
Cheryl James
Sandra Denton
Denise Cote
Noise In The Attic Productions
Next Plateau Records
Artist Master Rights Reclamation
Artist vs. Label Legal Battles
Legacy Artist Contract Disputes
Music Copyright Litigation
Industry Litigation
Artist Lawsuits and Legal Battles
Federal Copyright Law vs. State Contract Law
Master Rights
Motion to Dismiss
Record Labels
Legal Blotter
Royalty Disputes
Copyright Termination Rights
Litigation
Legal Disputes
United States
New York, US
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
This story was written with information from Variety.
We covered it because it’s an update on the legal battle between UMG and Salt-N-Pepa.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Jan 12, 2026
1 min read
Over 130 Music Professionals Demand EU Action on Unauthorized Ticket Resales
Signatories to the open letter include reps for A-list artists such as Radiohead, Oasis, and Ed Sheeran

Policy & Legal
Jan 12, 2026
1 min read
Elon Musk’s X Sues NMPA, 18 Publishers as Licensing Dispute Widens
The platform alleges collusion and anti-competitive behavior

Policy & Legal
Jan 12, 2026
1 min read
Los Lobos Sue Sony Music, Sony Pictures Over Unpaid Royalties
The claims relate to music used in the films ‘La Bamba’ and ‘Desperado’

Over 130 Music Professionals Demand EU Action on Unauthorized Ticket Resales
Signatories to the open letter include reps for A-list artists such as Radiohead, Oasis, and Ed Sheeran

Harry Levin
Policy
Jan 12, 2026

Elon Musk’s X Sues NMPA, 18 Publishers as Licensing Dispute Widens
The platform alleges collusion and anti-competitive behavior

Rod Yates
Policy
Jan 12, 2026

Los Lobos Sue Sony Music, Sony Pictures Over Unpaid Royalties
The claims relate to music used in the films ‘La Bamba’ and ‘Desperado’

Rod Yates
Policy
Jan 12, 2026

Bad Bunny Sued for $16 Million Over Unauthorized Sample
The complaint is related to two of Puerto Rican superstar’s songs

Harry Levin
Policy
Jan 9, 2026

Ticketmaster Faces Class Action in Quebec Over Service Fees
The ticketing giant is accused of violating Quebec’s Consumer Protection Act

Rod Yates
Policy
Jan 8, 2026

Ticketmaster Moves to Dismiss FTC Ticket Resale Case
Claims the BOTS Act applies to resellers, not ticketing platforms

Rod Yates
Policy
Jan 8, 2026




