


New AI Framework Aims to Secure Creator Rights and Pay
The move establishes an industry framework for consent and compensation.
The Association for Electronic Music (AFEM) has published its ‘AI Principles’ which, it contends, will help protect creators as GenAI technology continues to develop.
The principles:
- AI developers must obtain “explicit authorization” from rightsholders before using their music to train AI models. 
- They should provide “fair compensation and transparent accreditation” in the process. 
- AI-specific clauses should be inserted into all creator and rightsholder contracts to “ensure proper authorization and compensation,” as existing contracts are unlikely to contain such clauses. 
- Creators should retain moral and usage rights over their work, with the right to reject requests for their music to be used for AI training. 
What they said:
- AFEM Co-Chair Kurosh Nasseri (as per Music Ally): “The problem with GenAI has been that all involved are operating in the absence of a generally-agreed framework for what is acceptable and what is not. By formulating a simple set of core principles which define the parameters of acceptable GenAI operations, we will create the environment in which this new technology can flourish without violating the rights of creators and rightsholders of existing copyrights.” 
The Association for Electronic Music (AFEM) has published its ‘AI Principles’ which, it contends, will help protect creators as GenAI technology continues to develop.
The principles:
- AI developers must obtain “explicit authorization” from rightsholders before using their music to train AI models. 
- They should provide “fair compensation and transparent accreditation” in the process. 
- AI-specific clauses should be inserted into all creator and rightsholder contracts to “ensure proper authorization and compensation,” as existing contracts are unlikely to contain such clauses. 
- Creators should retain moral and usage rights over their work, with the right to reject requests for their music to be used for AI training. 
What they said:
- AFEM Co-Chair Kurosh Nasseri (as per Music Ally): “The problem with GenAI has been that all involved are operating in the absence of a generally-agreed framework for what is acceptable and what is not. By formulating a simple set of core principles which define the parameters of acceptable GenAI operations, we will create the environment in which this new technology can flourish without violating the rights of creators and rightsholders of existing copyrights.” 
The Association for Electronic Music (AFEM) has published its ‘AI Principles’ which, it contends, will help protect creators as GenAI technology continues to develop.
The principles:
- AI developers must obtain “explicit authorization” from rightsholders before using their music to train AI models. 
- They should provide “fair compensation and transparent accreditation” in the process. 
- AI-specific clauses should be inserted into all creator and rightsholder contracts to “ensure proper authorization and compensation,” as existing contracts are unlikely to contain such clauses. 
- Creators should retain moral and usage rights over their work, with the right to reject requests for their music to be used for AI training. 
What they said:
- AFEM Co-Chair Kurosh Nasseri (as per Music Ally): “The problem with GenAI has been that all involved are operating in the absence of a generally-agreed framework for what is acceptable and what is not. By formulating a simple set of core principles which define the parameters of acceptable GenAI operations, we will create the environment in which this new technology can flourish without violating the rights of creators and rightsholders of existing copyrights.” 
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This story was written with information sourced from Music Ally.
- We covered it because AI and copyright are major issues in the music industry.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Oct 29, 2025
1 min read
Drake Appeals Judge’s Decision to Dismiss ‘Not Like Us’ Lawsuit
Drake’s legal team signaled they would appeal the initial decision as soon as it was handed down

Policy & Legal
Oct 29, 2025
1 min read
ASCAP, BMI, and SOCAN Open Registrations for Partially AI-Generated Compositions
The three major PROs have been vocal advocates of AI regulation in the past

Policy & Legal
Oct 28, 2025
1 min read
Australia Rejects Proposal to Exempt AI Training from Copyright Laws
The government is calling for transparency in AI training and licensing of content

Drake Appeals Judge’s Decision to Dismiss ‘Not Like Us’ Lawsuit
Drake’s legal team signaled they would appeal the initial decision as soon as it was handed down

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 29, 2025

ASCAP, BMI, and SOCAN Open Registrations for Partially AI-Generated Compositions
The three major PROs have been vocal advocates of AI regulation in the past

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 29, 2025

Australia Rejects Proposal to Exempt AI Training from Copyright Laws
The government is calling for transparency in AI training and licensing of content

Rod Yates
Policy
Oct 28, 2025

Lizzo Sued for Copyright Infringement
Documents were filed in California on Tuesday

Rod Yates
Policy
Oct 23, 2025

Slipknot Fights to Reclaim Slipknot.com from Alleged Cybersquatter
The third party has controlled the domain since 2001

Rod Yates
Policy
Oct 22, 2025

Ticket Fees in New York Have Surged by 36% Since 2016
The figure comes from a recent study by NITO

Rod Yates
Policy
Oct 22, 2025



