


Music Artists Coalition Lays Out Ethical Guidelines in Wake of UMG/Udio Deal
The artist advocacy group released a statement in response to the new partnership between the major label and the prominent AI company
In a recent statement, Music Artists Coalition (MAC) has outlined how artists can be properly considered following the landmark deal between Universal Music Group (UMG) and the major AI music generation company, Udio.
The details:
MAC laid out three key guidelines to ensure artists are not overlooked as AI becomes further integrated into the music industry.
Artist consent: Artists having the final say if and how their work is used for AI training.
Fair compensation: Proper royalty splits should they all their music to be part of AI training programs.
Deal and data clarity: Being fully aware of the terms of any deals struck.
Large-scale AI deals have offered concessions, such as opt-in, to allow artists some control over their involvement.
MAC’s key points are meant to further clarify how that can work in artists' favor.
What they said:
Irving Azoff, board member and founder of MAC: “Every technological advance offers opportunity, but we have to make sure it doesn’t come at the expense of the people who actually create the music - artists and songwriters. We've seen this before - everyone talks about 'partnership,' but artists end up on the sidelines with scraps. Artists must have creative control, fair compensation, and clarity about deals being done based on their catalogs."
Ron Gubitz, MAC’s Executive Director: "Artist opt-in sounds promising, but participation without fair compensation isn't partnership; it's just permission. Artists create the work that makes these AI systems possible. They deserve both control over how their work is used and appropriate compensation for its value generation. The music industry is at a crossroads. The decisions being made right now will shape how music gets created, distributed, and monetized for decades to come."
In a recent statement, Music Artists Coalition (MAC) has outlined how artists can be properly considered following the landmark deal between Universal Music Group (UMG) and the major AI music generation company, Udio.
The details:
MAC laid out three key guidelines to ensure artists are not overlooked as AI becomes further integrated into the music industry.
Artist consent: Artists having the final say if and how their work is used for AI training.
Fair compensation: Proper royalty splits should they all their music to be part of AI training programs.
Deal and data clarity: Being fully aware of the terms of any deals struck.
Large-scale AI deals have offered concessions, such as opt-in, to allow artists some control over their involvement.
MAC’s key points are meant to further clarify how that can work in artists' favor.
What they said:
Irving Azoff, board member and founder of MAC: “Every technological advance offers opportunity, but we have to make sure it doesn’t come at the expense of the people who actually create the music - artists and songwriters. We've seen this before - everyone talks about 'partnership,' but artists end up on the sidelines with scraps. Artists must have creative control, fair compensation, and clarity about deals being done based on their catalogs."
Ron Gubitz, MAC’s Executive Director: "Artist opt-in sounds promising, but participation without fair compensation isn't partnership; it's just permission. Artists create the work that makes these AI systems possible. They deserve both control over how their work is used and appropriate compensation for its value generation. The music industry is at a crossroads. The decisions being made right now will shape how music gets created, distributed, and monetized for decades to come."
In a recent statement, Music Artists Coalition (MAC) has outlined how artists can be properly considered following the landmark deal between Universal Music Group (UMG) and the major AI music generation company, Udio.
The details:
MAC laid out three key guidelines to ensure artists are not overlooked as AI becomes further integrated into the music industry.
Artist consent: Artists having the final say if and how their work is used for AI training.
Fair compensation: Proper royalty splits should they all their music to be part of AI training programs.
Deal and data clarity: Being fully aware of the terms of any deals struck.
Large-scale AI deals have offered concessions, such as opt-in, to allow artists some control over their involvement.
MAC’s key points are meant to further clarify how that can work in artists' favor.
What they said:
Irving Azoff, board member and founder of MAC: “Every technological advance offers opportunity, but we have to make sure it doesn’t come at the expense of the people who actually create the music - artists and songwriters. We've seen this before - everyone talks about 'partnership,' but artists end up on the sidelines with scraps. Artists must have creative control, fair compensation, and clarity about deals being done based on their catalogs."
Ron Gubitz, MAC’s Executive Director: "Artist opt-in sounds promising, but participation without fair compensation isn't partnership; it's just permission. Artists create the work that makes these AI systems possible. They deserve both control over how their work is used and appropriate compensation for its value generation. The music industry is at a crossroads. The decisions being made right now will shape how music gets created, distributed, and monetized for decades to come."
Music Artists Coalition
Udio
Irving Azoff
Ron Gubitz
Universal Music Group (UMG)
AI Music Regulation
AI Training Controversies
Protecting Artists From AI
Differentiating Ethical AI Use
AI's Impact On Human Creators
AI Music Licensing Models
Artist Rights And Royalty Disputes
AI Copyright Battles
Unified Industry AI Strategy
Legal Battles Over AI Music
AI Model Training
Songwriter Advocacy
AI Ethics
AI Licensing Deals
Policy & Legal
Royalty Disputes
Artist Management
United States
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This article was written from a press release provided by MAC.
- We covered it because of the ongoing integration of AI into the music industry.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Nov 3, 2025
1 min read
Udio Allows Downloads for 48 Hours Following UMG Deal Outcry
The gen AI music platform yielded to the demands of angry subscribers

Policy & Legal
Nov 3, 2025
1 min read
Live Nation, Ticketmaster Face Lawsuit Over Ticketing Technology Patent
The suit was filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York

Policy & Legal
Oct 29, 2025
1 min read
Drake Appeals Judge’s Decision to Dismiss ‘Not Like Us’ Lawsuit
Drake’s legal team signaled they would appeal the initial decision as soon as it was handed down

Udio Allows Downloads for 48 Hours Following UMG Deal Outcry
The gen AI music platform yielded to the demands of angry subscribers

Rod Yates
Policy
Nov 3, 2025

Live Nation, Ticketmaster Face Lawsuit Over Ticketing Technology Patent
The suit was filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York

Rod Yates
Policy
Nov 3, 2025

Drake Appeals Judge’s Decision to Dismiss ‘Not Like Us’ Lawsuit
Drake’s legal team signaled they would appeal the initial decision as soon as it was handed down

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 29, 2025

ASCAP, BMI, and SOCAN Open Registrations for Partially AI-Generated Compositions
The three major PROs have been vocal advocates of AI regulation in the past

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 29, 2025

Australia Rejects Proposal to Exempt AI Training from Copyright Laws
The government is calling for transparency in AI training and licensing of content

Rod Yates
Policy
Oct 28, 2025

Lizzo Sued for Copyright Infringement
Documents were filed in California on Tuesday

Rod Yates
Policy
Oct 23, 2025




