


Major Creator Orgs Back Pivotal Copyright Case Vetter v. Resnik
At stake is the worldwide application of copyright termination rights
Prominent creator advocacy organizations have united to file an amicus brief in support of the Vetter vs Resnik copyright case, which could affirm songwriter rights globally.
The organizations:
- The brief was filed by the Music Artists Coalition (MAC), the non-profit body that fights for the rights of music creators. 
- It’s joined in the coalition by the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), Black Music Action Coalition (BMAC), Artist Rights Alliance (ARA) and Songwriters of North America (SONA). 
What’s at stake:
- Copyright termination rights enable creators to reclaim rights to their works 35 years after signing them away. 
- The issue of whether that law applies only to domestic rights as opposed to international rights is at the heart of the Vetter vs Resnik copyright case, which is currently before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. 
- That case revolves around a 1963 agreement in which songwriter Cyril Vetter signed away worldwide rights to his song “Double Shot (Of My Baby’s Love)” to Windsong Music Publishers. 
- When, decades later, he exercised his statutory right to end the agreement and reclaim his work, Resnik Music Group (which now owned Windsong) claimed the action only pertains to the US market. 
- The District Court found in favor of Vetter, ruling that the termination recaptures worldwide rights. 
- The industry bodies are urging the Fifth Circuit to uphold that ruling. 
The amicus brief:
- The coalition’s amicus brief argues that restricting termination rights to domestic ownership undermines the creator protections originally intended by Congress, particularly in an age of streaming where songs can immediately become global hits and generate revenue internationally. 
What they said:
- Jen Jacobsen, Artist Rights Alliance: “US copyright law must reflect the realities of today’s global music economy, ensuring that artists have the power to reclaim their rights worldwide in a marketplace where their work has instant global reach. Limiting termination rights to the US alone defies both the letter and spirit of the Copyright Act, denying creators the fair treatment and second chance promised to them under the law.” 
Prominent creator advocacy organizations have united to file an amicus brief in support of the Vetter vs Resnik copyright case, which could affirm songwriter rights globally.
The organizations:
- The brief was filed by the Music Artists Coalition (MAC), the non-profit body that fights for the rights of music creators. 
- It’s joined in the coalition by the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), Black Music Action Coalition (BMAC), Artist Rights Alliance (ARA) and Songwriters of North America (SONA). 
What’s at stake:
- Copyright termination rights enable creators to reclaim rights to their works 35 years after signing them away. 
- The issue of whether that law applies only to domestic rights as opposed to international rights is at the heart of the Vetter vs Resnik copyright case, which is currently before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. 
- That case revolves around a 1963 agreement in which songwriter Cyril Vetter signed away worldwide rights to his song “Double Shot (Of My Baby’s Love)” to Windsong Music Publishers. 
- When, decades later, he exercised his statutory right to end the agreement and reclaim his work, Resnik Music Group (which now owned Windsong) claimed the action only pertains to the US market. 
- The District Court found in favor of Vetter, ruling that the termination recaptures worldwide rights. 
- The industry bodies are urging the Fifth Circuit to uphold that ruling. 
The amicus brief:
- The coalition’s amicus brief argues that restricting termination rights to domestic ownership undermines the creator protections originally intended by Congress, particularly in an age of streaming where songs can immediately become global hits and generate revenue internationally. 
What they said:
- Jen Jacobsen, Artist Rights Alliance: “US copyright law must reflect the realities of today’s global music economy, ensuring that artists have the power to reclaim their rights worldwide in a marketplace where their work has instant global reach. Limiting termination rights to the US alone defies both the letter and spirit of the Copyright Act, denying creators the fair treatment and second chance promised to them under the law.” 
Prominent creator advocacy organizations have united to file an amicus brief in support of the Vetter vs Resnik copyright case, which could affirm songwriter rights globally.
The organizations:
- The brief was filed by the Music Artists Coalition (MAC), the non-profit body that fights for the rights of music creators. 
- It’s joined in the coalition by the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), Black Music Action Coalition (BMAC), Artist Rights Alliance (ARA) and Songwriters of North America (SONA). 
What’s at stake:
- Copyright termination rights enable creators to reclaim rights to their works 35 years after signing them away. 
- The issue of whether that law applies only to domestic rights as opposed to international rights is at the heart of the Vetter vs Resnik copyright case, which is currently before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. 
- That case revolves around a 1963 agreement in which songwriter Cyril Vetter signed away worldwide rights to his song “Double Shot (Of My Baby’s Love)” to Windsong Music Publishers. 
- When, decades later, he exercised his statutory right to end the agreement and reclaim his work, Resnik Music Group (which now owned Windsong) claimed the action only pertains to the US market. 
- The District Court found in favor of Vetter, ruling that the termination recaptures worldwide rights. 
- The industry bodies are urging the Fifth Circuit to uphold that ruling. 
The amicus brief:
- The coalition’s amicus brief argues that restricting termination rights to domestic ownership undermines the creator protections originally intended by Congress, particularly in an age of streaming where songs can immediately become global hits and generate revenue internationally. 
What they said:
- Jen Jacobsen, Artist Rights Alliance: “US copyright law must reflect the realities of today’s global music economy, ensuring that artists have the power to reclaim their rights worldwide in a marketplace where their work has instant global reach. Limiting termination rights to the US alone defies both the letter and spirit of the Copyright Act, denying creators the fair treatment and second chance promised to them under the law.” 
Vetter Vs Resnik
Music Artists Coalition
SAG-AFTRA
Black Music Action Coalition
Artist Rights Alliance
Songwriters of North America
Cyril Vetter
Resnik Music Group
Jen Jacobsen
Fifth Circuit Court Of Appeals
Artist Rights And Royalty Disputes
Music Copyright Litigation
Artist Master Rights Reclamation
Extraterritorial Copyright Law
Songwriter Collective Action
Industry Litigation
Copyright Termination Rights
Litigation
Songwriter Advocacy
Global Copyright Scope
Policy & Legal
Master Rights
United States
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This story was written with information sourced from Digital Music News and Music Business Worldwide.
- We covered it because the case has significant implications for songwriters and rightsholders.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Oct 29, 2025
1 min read
Drake Appeals Judge’s Decision to Dismiss ‘Not Like Us’ Lawsuit
Drake’s legal team signaled they would appeal the initial decision as soon as it was handed down

Policy & Legal
Oct 29, 2025
1 min read
ASCAP, BMI, and SOCAN Open Registrations for Partially AI-Generated Compositions
The three major PROs have been vocal advocates of AI regulation in the past

Policy & Legal
Oct 28, 2025
1 min read
Australia Rejects Proposal to Exempt AI Training from Copyright Laws
The government is calling for transparency in AI training and licensing of content

Drake Appeals Judge’s Decision to Dismiss ‘Not Like Us’ Lawsuit
Drake’s legal team signaled they would appeal the initial decision as soon as it was handed down

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 29, 2025

ASCAP, BMI, and SOCAN Open Registrations for Partially AI-Generated Compositions
The three major PROs have been vocal advocates of AI regulation in the past

Harry Levin
Policy
Oct 29, 2025

Australia Rejects Proposal to Exempt AI Training from Copyright Laws
The government is calling for transparency in AI training and licensing of content

Rod Yates
Policy
Oct 28, 2025

Lizzo Sued for Copyright Infringement
Documents were filed in California on Tuesday

Rod Yates
Policy
Oct 23, 2025

Slipknot Fights to Reclaim Slipknot.com from Alleged Cybersquatter
The third party has controlled the domain since 2001

Rod Yates
Policy
Oct 22, 2025

Ticket Fees in New York Have Surged by 36% Since 2016
The figure comes from a recent study by NITO

Rod Yates
Policy
Oct 22, 2025



