
A lawsuit alleging that Spotify failed to address bot-driven fraudulent streams involving artists such as Drake, potentially reducing royalties paid to other music rightsholders, has been permanently dismissed by a US federal judge.
The original claim:
In November 2025, rapper RBX – real name Eric Dwayne Collins – filed a proposed class action seeking to represent US rightsholders whose music is on Spotify.
Spotify pools subscription and advertising revenue in each market monthly, then distributes it according to each track’s share of streams.
RBX argued that artificially inflating one artist’s streams reduces the proportion of royalties available to other rightsholders.
Drake was cited as the central example but was not named as a defendant.
The rulings:
On June 22, Judge Josephine Staton dismissed RBX’s original complaint, finding that he had not established Spotify owed artists a legal duty to protect them from third-party bots, or that the company had violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.
RBX filed an amended complaint on July 13, alleging that a “substantial, non-trivial percentage” of Drake’s approximately 37 billion Spotify streams over a 48-month period were generated by bots.
The amended complaint estimated that the alleged fraud had diverted at least $600 million in royalties from music rightsholders.
It also argued that Spotify selectively enforced its anti-fraud policies, penalizing smaller artists while allowing alleged artificial streaming involving major artists to go unchecked.
On October 23, Judge Staton dismissed the revised case with prejudice, finding that it still failed to establish a valid legal claim.
She also found insufficient evidence that Spotify’s statements about its anti-fraud measures were deceptive.
The judge ruled that allowing another amendment would be futile, preventing RBX from bringing the same claims again.
The ruling did not determine whether Drake’s streams were fraudulent.
What’s next:
RBX’s lawyer said an appeal was likely.
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
This story was written with information from Music Business Worldwide.
We covered it because it’s news of a lawsuit involving Spotify.













