


Music Artists Coalition Lays Out Ethical Guidelines in Wake of UMG/Udio Deal
The artist advocacy group released a statement in response to the new partnership between the major label and the prominent AI company
In a recent statement, Music Artists Coalition (MAC) has outlined how artists can be properly considered following the landmark deal between Universal Music Group (UMG) and the major AI music generation company, Udio.
The details:
MAC laid out three key guidelines to ensure artists are not overlooked as AI becomes further integrated into the music industry.
Artist consent: Artists having the final say if and how their work is used for AI training.
Fair compensation: Proper royalty splits should they all their music to be part of AI training programs.
Deal and data clarity: Being fully aware of the terms of any deals struck.
Large-scale AI deals have offered concessions, such as opt-in, to allow artists some control over their involvement.
MAC’s key points are meant to further clarify how that can work in artists' favor.
What they said:
Irving Azoff, board member and founder of MAC: “Every technological advance offers opportunity, but we have to make sure it doesn’t come at the expense of the people who actually create the music - artists and songwriters. We've seen this before - everyone talks about 'partnership,' but artists end up on the sidelines with scraps. Artists must have creative control, fair compensation, and clarity about deals being done based on their catalogs."
Ron Gubitz, MAC’s Executive Director: "Artist opt-in sounds promising, but participation without fair compensation isn't partnership; it's just permission. Artists create the work that makes these AI systems possible. They deserve both control over how their work is used and appropriate compensation for its value generation. The music industry is at a crossroads. The decisions being made right now will shape how music gets created, distributed, and monetized for decades to come."
In a recent statement, Music Artists Coalition (MAC) has outlined how artists can be properly considered following the landmark deal between Universal Music Group (UMG) and the major AI music generation company, Udio.
The details:
MAC laid out three key guidelines to ensure artists are not overlooked as AI becomes further integrated into the music industry.
Artist consent: Artists having the final say if and how their work is used for AI training.
Fair compensation: Proper royalty splits should they all their music to be part of AI training programs.
Deal and data clarity: Being fully aware of the terms of any deals struck.
Large-scale AI deals have offered concessions, such as opt-in, to allow artists some control over their involvement.
MAC’s key points are meant to further clarify how that can work in artists' favor.
What they said:
Irving Azoff, board member and founder of MAC: “Every technological advance offers opportunity, but we have to make sure it doesn’t come at the expense of the people who actually create the music - artists and songwriters. We've seen this before - everyone talks about 'partnership,' but artists end up on the sidelines with scraps. Artists must have creative control, fair compensation, and clarity about deals being done based on their catalogs."
Ron Gubitz, MAC’s Executive Director: "Artist opt-in sounds promising, but participation without fair compensation isn't partnership; it's just permission. Artists create the work that makes these AI systems possible. They deserve both control over how their work is used and appropriate compensation for its value generation. The music industry is at a crossroads. The decisions being made right now will shape how music gets created, distributed, and monetized for decades to come."
In a recent statement, Music Artists Coalition (MAC) has outlined how artists can be properly considered following the landmark deal between Universal Music Group (UMG) and the major AI music generation company, Udio.
The details:
MAC laid out three key guidelines to ensure artists are not overlooked as AI becomes further integrated into the music industry.
Artist consent: Artists having the final say if and how their work is used for AI training.
Fair compensation: Proper royalty splits should they all their music to be part of AI training programs.
Deal and data clarity: Being fully aware of the terms of any deals struck.
Large-scale AI deals have offered concessions, such as opt-in, to allow artists some control over their involvement.
MAC’s key points are meant to further clarify how that can work in artists' favor.
What they said:
Irving Azoff, board member and founder of MAC: “Every technological advance offers opportunity, but we have to make sure it doesn’t come at the expense of the people who actually create the music - artists and songwriters. We've seen this before - everyone talks about 'partnership,' but artists end up on the sidelines with scraps. Artists must have creative control, fair compensation, and clarity about deals being done based on their catalogs."
Ron Gubitz, MAC’s Executive Director: "Artist opt-in sounds promising, but participation without fair compensation isn't partnership; it's just permission. Artists create the work that makes these AI systems possible. They deserve both control over how their work is used and appropriate compensation for its value generation. The music industry is at a crossroads. The decisions being made right now will shape how music gets created, distributed, and monetized for decades to come."
Music Artists Coalition
Udio
Irving Azoff
Ron Gubitz
Universal Music Group (UMG)
AI Music Regulation
AI Training Controversies
Protecting Artists From AI
Differentiating Ethical AI Use
AI's Impact On Human Creators
AI Music Licensing Models
Artist Rights And Royalty Disputes
AI Copyright Battles
Unified Industry AI Strategy
Legal Battles Over AI Music
AI Model Training
Songwriter Advocacy
AI Ethics
AI Licensing Deals
Policy & Legal
Royalty Disputes
Artist Management
United States
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
- This article was written from a press release provided by MAC.
- We covered it because of the ongoing integration of AI into the music industry.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Nov 14, 2025
1 min read
Radiohead, Coldplay, and Other Major UK Artists Call for Ticket Price Cap
The headlining acts signed an open letter to the government requesting a cap on resale ticket prices

Policy & Legal
Nov 13, 2025
1 min read
Downtown Music Holdings Faces New $375 Million Lawsuit Amidst UMG Deal Probe
YouTube royalty platform Blast Off Media filed the new lawsuit

Policy & Legal
Nov 11, 2025
1 min read
German Court Rules ChatGPT Illegally Used Song Lyrics for AI Training
This is the first time a court in Europe has ruled in favor of creators whose works were used to train generative AI

Radiohead, Coldplay, and Other Major UK Artists Call for Ticket Price Cap
The headlining acts signed an open letter to the government requesting a cap on resale ticket prices

Harry Levin
Policy
Nov 14, 2025

Downtown Music Holdings Faces New $375 Million Lawsuit Amidst UMG Deal Probe
YouTube royalty platform Blast Off Media filed the new lawsuit

Harry Levin
Policy
Nov 13, 2025

German Court Rules ChatGPT Illegally Used Song Lyrics for AI Training
This is the first time a court in Europe has ruled in favor of creators whose works were used to train generative AI

Harry Levin
Policy
Nov 11, 2025

Music Publishers Move to Reopen Lawsuit Against the NBA
The complaint states that the professional sports organization illegally used music in social media videos

Harry Levin
Policy
Nov 10, 2025

Spotify Faces Class Action Lawsuit Alleging “Pay For Play” Discovery Mode
The claim states that third-party payments can influence music placements in Discovery Mode and editorial playlists

Harry Levin
Policy
Nov 6, 2025

Suno Sued by Danish Songwriter Collecting Society Koda
It alleges “the biggest theft in music history”

Rod Yates
Policy
Nov 5, 2025



