


Court Sides With Lady Gaga in Dispute Over ‘Mayhem’ Branding
The singer was sued by surf company Lost Surfboards in March
A court has ruled that Lady Gaga can continue to sell her ‘Mayhem’ merch, despite being sued by surf company Lost Surfboards.
The issue:
Lost Surfboards claimed that the ‘Mayhem’ logo used on Gaga’s merch infringed on their design, which has been part of the company’s branding since 1988.
Mayhem is the title of Gaga’s sixth solo studio album, which was released in March.
The ruling:
As per Digital Music News, Judge Fernando M. Olguin has ruled that the artist’s use of the word and the design doesn’t “explicitly mislead consumers” into thinking her merch is the surf company’s, or vice versa.
As a result, Lost Surfboards is unable to proceed with its trademark infringement claim.
It’s expected that Gaga’s lawyers will file a motion to dismiss; Lost’s attorneys may consider settling.
What they said:
Orin Snyder, Lady Gaga’s lead attorney (talking to Billboard): “[This] reaffirms that trademark law cannot be used to censor expressive works or chill artistic expression. We are pleased with the court’s clear and decisive ruling.”
Keith Bremer, Lost Surfboards’ attorney: “While we would have preferred a different outcome at this preliminary stage, we respect the court’s reasoning and look forward to continuing this process. Our commitment to protecting the ‘Mayhem’ trademark we’ve built over nearly four decades remains unchanged.”
A court has ruled that Lady Gaga can continue to sell her ‘Mayhem’ merch, despite being sued by surf company Lost Surfboards.
The issue:
Lost Surfboards claimed that the ‘Mayhem’ logo used on Gaga’s merch infringed on their design, which has been part of the company’s branding since 1988.
Mayhem is the title of Gaga’s sixth solo studio album, which was released in March.
The ruling:
As per Digital Music News, Judge Fernando M. Olguin has ruled that the artist’s use of the word and the design doesn’t “explicitly mislead consumers” into thinking her merch is the surf company’s, or vice versa.
As a result, Lost Surfboards is unable to proceed with its trademark infringement claim.
It’s expected that Gaga’s lawyers will file a motion to dismiss; Lost’s attorneys may consider settling.
What they said:
Orin Snyder, Lady Gaga’s lead attorney (talking to Billboard): “[This] reaffirms that trademark law cannot be used to censor expressive works or chill artistic expression. We are pleased with the court’s clear and decisive ruling.”
Keith Bremer, Lost Surfboards’ attorney: “While we would have preferred a different outcome at this preliminary stage, we respect the court’s reasoning and look forward to continuing this process. Our commitment to protecting the ‘Mayhem’ trademark we’ve built over nearly four decades remains unchanged.”
A court has ruled that Lady Gaga can continue to sell her ‘Mayhem’ merch, despite being sued by surf company Lost Surfboards.
The issue:
Lost Surfboards claimed that the ‘Mayhem’ logo used on Gaga’s merch infringed on their design, which has been part of the company’s branding since 1988.
Mayhem is the title of Gaga’s sixth solo studio album, which was released in March.
The ruling:
As per Digital Music News, Judge Fernando M. Olguin has ruled that the artist’s use of the word and the design doesn’t “explicitly mislead consumers” into thinking her merch is the surf company’s, or vice versa.
As a result, Lost Surfboards is unable to proceed with its trademark infringement claim.
It’s expected that Gaga’s lawyers will file a motion to dismiss; Lost’s attorneys may consider settling.
What they said:
Orin Snyder, Lady Gaga’s lead attorney (talking to Billboard): “[This] reaffirms that trademark law cannot be used to censor expressive works or chill artistic expression. We are pleased with the court’s clear and decisive ruling.”
Keith Bremer, Lost Surfboards’ attorney: “While we would have preferred a different outcome at this preliminary stage, we respect the court’s reasoning and look forward to continuing this process. Our commitment to protecting the ‘Mayhem’ trademark we’ve built over nearly four decades remains unchanged.”
👋 Disclosures & Transparency Block
This story was written with information from Digital Music News.
We covered it because it’s news of copyright infringement involving a high profile artist.
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
📨 Subscribe to NIF
Get news dropped in your inbox 👇
Related Articles

Policy & Legal
Feb 13, 2026
1 min read
UMG Inks Global Licensing Deal with ClicknClear
Paves the way for the use of licensed tracks in choreographed sports

Policy & Legal
Feb 12, 2026
1 min read
Mozart AI Raises $6M in Oversubscribed Funding Round
Says its user base has topped 100,000

Policy & Legal
Feb 12, 2026
1 min read
ASCAP Paid Out $1.75 Billion in Royalties in 2025
The amount is a record for the PRO

UMG Inks Global Licensing Deal with ClicknClear
Paves the way for the use of licensed tracks in choreographed sports

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 13, 2026

Mozart AI Raises $6M in Oversubscribed Funding Round
Says its user base has topped 100,000

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 12, 2026

ASCAP Paid Out $1.75 Billion in Royalties in 2025
The amount is a record for the PRO

Harry Levin
Policy
Feb 12, 2026

SoundExchange Secures New Agreements in Barbados, Denmark, Kenya, Portugal, and More
These recent deals give the performance rights collection organization coverage of 91% of the global neighboring rights market

Harry Levin
Policy
Feb 11, 2026

Joe Rinaldi Appointed President of NIVA California
The organization has outlined a strategic four-pillar focus for 2026

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 10, 2026

Pandora and the MLC Escalate Royalties Dispute
Each has requested summary judgment in their favor

Rod Yates
Policy
Feb 10, 2026




